Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ankit Shah 0003

dblp:04/1935-3 · also Ankit J. Shah · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-6818-0827ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% Robot manipulation · 15%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
specification inference
0.722019
Bayesian Inference of Linear Temporal Logic Specifications for Contrastive Explanations · IJCAI 2019
Bayesian Inference of Temporal Task Specifications from Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations › non-classical logics
temporal logic
0.722019
Bayesian Inference of Linear Temporal Logic Specifications for Contrastive Explanations · IJCAI 2019
Bayesian Inference of Temporal Task Specifications from Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Bayes-TrEx: a Bayesian Sampling Approach to Model Transparency by Example · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
model transparency
0.512021
Bayes-TrEx: a Bayesian Sampling Approach to Model Transparency by Example · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › local explanation
contrastive explanation
0.412019
Bayesian Inference of Linear Temporal Logic Specifications for Contrastive Explanations · IJCAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations › non-classical logics › temporal logic
linear temporal logic
0.412019
Bayesian Inference of Linear Temporal Logic Specifications for Contrastive Explanations · IJCAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning
plan explanation
0.412019
Bayesian Inference of Linear Temporal Logic Specifications for Contrastive Explanations · IJCAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning
0.412019
Bayesian Inference of Linear Temporal Logic Specifications for Contrastive Explanations · IJCAI 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.312018
Bayesian Inference of Temporal Task Specifications from Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning
0.312018
Bayesian Inference of Temporal Task Specifications from Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › deformable object manipulation
deformable linear object manipulation
0.212016
Towards manipulation planning for multiple interlinked deformable linear objects · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Robot manipulation
deformable object manipulation
0.212016
Towards manipulation planning for multiple interlinked deformable linear objects · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
manipulation planning
0.212016
Towards manipulation planning for multiple interlinked deformable linear objects · ICRA 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
bayesian sampling
0.112021
Bayes-TrEx: a Bayesian Sampling Approach to Model Transparency by Example · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.112018
Bayesian Inference of Temporal Task Specifications from Demonstrations · NeurIPS 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

shape scaling · 0.5primitive action sequencing · 0.5bayesian sampling · 0.5bayesian inference · 0.4sampling-based inference · 0.3probabilistic programming · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Bayes-TrEx: a Bayesian Sampling Approach to Model Transparency by Example
abstract
Post-hoc explanation methods are gaining popularity for interpreting, understanding, and debugging neural networks. Most analyses using such methods explain decisions in response to inputs drawn from the test set. However, the test set may have few examples that trigger some model behaviors, such as high-confidence failures or ambiguous classifications. To address these challenges, we introduce a flexible model inspection framework: Bayes-TrEx. Given a data distribution, Bayes-TrEx finds in-distribution examples which trigger a specified prediction confidence. We demonstrate several use cases of Bayes-TrEx, including revealing highly confident (mis)classifications, visualizing class boundaries via ambiguous examples, understanding novel-class extrapolation behavior, and exposing neural network overconfidence. We use Bayes-TrEx to study classifiers trained on CLEVR, MNIST, and Fashion-MNIST, and we show that this framework enables more flexible holistic model analysis than just inspecting the test set. Code and supplemental material are available at https://github.com/serenabooth/Bayes-TrEx.
Serena Booth, Yilun Zhou, Ankit Shah 0003, Julie A. Shah
AAAI3
2019 Bayesian Inference of Linear Temporal Logic Specifications for Contrastive Explanations
abstract
Temporal logics are useful for providing concise descriptions of system behavior, and have been successfully used as a language for goal definitions in task planning. Prior works on inferring temporal logic specifications have focused on "summarizing" the input dataset - i.e., finding specifications that are satisfied by all plan traces belonging to the given set. In this paper, we examine the problem of inferring specifications that describe temporal differences between two sets of plan traces. We formalize the concept of providing such contrastive explanations, then present BayesLTL - a Bayesian probabilistic model for inferring contrastive explanations as linear temporal logic (LTL) specifications. We demonstrate the robustness and scalability of our model for inferring accurate specifications from noisy data and across various benchmark planning domains.
Joseph Kim, Christian J. Muise, Ankit Shah 0003, Shubham Agarwal 0002, Julie A. Shah
IJCAI3
2018 Bayesian Inference of Temporal Task Specifications from Demonstrations
abstract
When observing task demonstrations, human apprentices are able to identify whether a given task is executed correctly long before they gain expertise in actually performing that task. Prior research into learning from demonstrations (LfD) has failed to capture this notion of the acceptability of an execution; meanwhile, temporal logics provide a flexible language for expressing task specifications. Inspired by this, we present Bayesian specification inference, a probabilistic model for inferring task specification as a temporal logic formula. We incorporate methods from probabilistic programming to define our priors, along with a domain-independent likelihood function to enable sampling-based inference. We demonstrate the efficacy of our model for inferring true specifications with over 90% similarity between the inferred specification and the ground truth, both within a synthetic domain and a real-world table setting task.
Ankit Shah 0003, Pritish Kamath, Julie A. Shah, Shen Li 0003
NeurIPS1
2018 Planning for Manipulation of Interlinked Deformable Linear Objects With Applications to Aircraft Assembly
abstract
Manipulation of deformable linear objects (DLOs) has potential applications in the fields of aerospace and automotive assembly. In this paper, we introduce a problem formulation for attaching a set of interlinked DLOs to a support structure using a set of clamping points. The formulation describes the manipulation planning problem in terms of known clamp poses; predetermined ideal clamping locations on the cables, called “reference points;” and a set of finite gripping points on the DLOs. We also present a prototype algorithm that generates a solution in terms of primitive manipulation actions. The algorithm guarantees that no interlink constraints are violated at any stage of manipulation. We incorporate gravity in the computation of a DLO shape and propose a property linking geometrically similar cable shapes across the space of cable length and stiffness. This property allows for the computation of solutions for unit length and scaling of these solutions to appropriate length, potentially resulting in faster shape computation.
Ankit Shah 0003, Lotta Blumberg, Julie A. Shah
IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng.1
2016 Towards manipulation planning for multiple interlinked deformable linear objects
abstract
Manipulation of deformable linear objects (DLO) has potential applications in aerospace and automotive assembly. The current literature on planning for deformable objects focuses on a single DLO at a time. In this paper, we provide a problem formulation for attaching a set of interlinked DLOs to a support structure through a set of clamping points. We also present a prototype algorithm that generates a solution in terms of primitive manipulation actions. The algorithm guarantees that none of the interlink constraints are violated. Finally, we incorporate gravity in the computation of a DLO shape and propose a property linking geometrically similar cable shapes across the space of cable length and stiffness. This property allows for computation of solutions for unit length and scaling of the solutions to appropriate length, thus potentially making shape computations faster.
Ankit Shah 0003, Julie A. Shah
ICRA1