Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul B. Schneck
dblp:04/4314
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 4 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 44% Hardware security and side channels · 44% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 13% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 72% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 25% Electronic design automation · 4% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital forensics and information hiding
digital rights management |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Persistent access control to prevent piracy of digital information · Proc. IEEE 1999 |
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Persistent access control to prevent piracy of digital information · Proc. IEEE 1999 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
key management |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Persistent access control to prevent piracy of digital information · Proc. IEEE 1999 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › interconnect architecture
communication fabric |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | The future of computing: a 50-year prediction · Proc. IEEE 1998 |
Software testing
random testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Comment on "When to Use Random Testing" · IEEE Trans. Computers 1979 |
Software testing › test adequacy
testing criteria |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Comment on "When to Use Random Testing" · IEEE Trans. Computers 1979 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Comment on "When to Use Random Testing" · IEEE Trans. Computers 1979 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
random testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1979 | Comment on "When to Use Random Testing" · IEEE Trans. Computers 1979 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
watermarking · 0.0encryption · 0.0threshold modification · 0.0fan-in analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | Persistent access control to prevent piracy of digital informationabstractMarshall McLuhan's statement that "the medium is the message" captured the reality of communications until the digital age. Communicating digitally involves the transfer of information as streams of bits. No longer does matter need to be moved. In the case of data representing continuous waveforms, the communication is complete when the recipient possesses a digital representation of the original signal with a given fidelity criterion. This allows one to embed watermarks to deliver hidden information. In the case of discrete data files, the communication is complete when the recipient possesses the identical stream of bits delivered by the source: at that moment there are two, identical, streams of bits. It is impossible to characterize one as the original and the other as the copy. Consequently, one loses control of digital information after transmitting it to another. The recipient is free to use their original as they see fit. The ubiquitous PC and Internet provide the means easily and inexpensively to copy and distribute data files to anyone wishing to do so. We introduce a framework for persistent access control over digital data. That is, data remain under the control of their originator, even after another has received them. This requires the use of multiple levels of encryption, transmission of ciphering keys through licenses associated with the data, and of trusted hardware and trusted software (access control mechanism) to ensure that the originator's restrictions are not circumvented. We show how a PC or consumer electronics appliance can accommodate the required system-while remaining compatible with previously produced data. This material is the subject of a pending U.S. Patent Application (allowed) and foreign applications. Paul B. Schneck |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |
| 1998 | The future of computing: a 50-year predictionabstractThree "technologies" are driving the growing use of computers. First, the underlying component technology simultaneously is becoming less expensive and more capable. Computation rate and reliability are increasing, while requirements for space and power are decreasing. Second, the communications infrastructure is undergoing a similar increase in capability and decrease in cost. Last, breakthroughs in computer science and mathematics, coupled with increases in raw computing speed, are providing solutions to problems previously thought to be intractable. Paul B. Schneck |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |
| 1997 | A modern review of "Electronic computing circuits of the ENIAC"abstractPresents a review of this classic paper. The body of the paper is divided into five sections: general circuit design considerations; types of computing circuits; flip-flop and counter design; units of the ENIAC; and analysis of typical circuits. Each section is described in this review. Paul B. Schneck |
Proc. IEEE | 1 |
| 1987 | Dedication
Paul B. Schneck |
J. Supercomput. | 1 |
| 1986 | Superlinear Speed-Up and the Halting Problem
Paul B. Schneck |
Softw. Pract. Exp. | 1 |
| 1983 | The Myth of Virtual MemoryabstractAbstract A common myth surrounding virtual memory systems is that they eliminate completely the need for programmers and analysts to deal with conservation, allocation, and management of addressable memory. This paper shows that paying appropriate attention to these factors can have even greater impact on virtual memory system performance than on real memory system performance. Guidelines for effectively using virtual memory are presented. Paul B. Schneck |
Softw. Pract. Exp. | 1 |
| 1979 | Comment on "When to Use Random Testing"abstractThis correspondence indicates a weakness in forming the criteria used to decide when random testing is practical. The use of average fan-in based on total gate count is an oversimplification and results in too low a threshold for use of random testing in lieu of a complete test of 2N patterns. A modification is given to avoid this difficulty. Paul B. Schneck |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |
| 1974 | The Myth of MultiprogrammingabstractAbstract A common myth surrounding multiprogramming is that it it a necessary mode of operation to deal with the high levels of I/O activity found on most computers. This paper shows that the high level of I/O activity is to a great extent a direct result of multiprogramming. Monoprogramming is proposed as a method of achieving high performance which yields advantages in turnaround time, efficiency and equipment configuration. Paul B. Schneck |
Softw. Pract. Exp. | 1 |
| 1973 | A FORTRAN to FORTRAN Optimising CompilerabstractThis paper describes the implementation of a machine independent compiler designed to produce optimised source code for a higher level language. The advantages of optimising at the source rather than the machine code level are discussed. Optimisation techniques are set out in detail, paying particular attention to analysis of program structure and optimisation in the presence of flow. Paul B. Schneck, Ellinor Angel |
Comput. J. | 1 |