Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian B. Avants

dblp:04/6739 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
33ranked-venue papers
8as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4212-3362ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 26 · 8 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 23 · 6 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 66% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Segmentation and scene understanding · 12%
Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Image and video processing · 76% Geometric modeling and processing · 24%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 73% Computational geometry · 27%

Topics — the 19 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning
0.812024
Multimodal Patient Representation Learning with Missing Modalities and Labels · ICLR 2024
Medical and health informatics
clinical prediction
0.812024
Multimodal Patient Representation Learning with Missing Modalities and Labels · ICLR 2024
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis
0.332012
From label fusion to correspondence fusion: A new approach to unbiased groupwise registration · CVPR 2012
Directly Manipulated Free-Form Deformation Image Registration · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2009
Improved FFD B-Spline Image Registration · ICCV 2007
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › learning with incomplete data
robustness to missing data
0.212024
Multimodal Patient Representation Learning with Missing Modalities and Labels · ICLR 2024
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
groupwise registration
0.112012
From label fusion to correspondence fusion: A new approach to unbiased groupwise registration · CVPR 2012
Image and video processing
image registration
0.122007
Improved FFD B-Spline Image Registration · ICCV 2007
Multi-start Method with Prior Learning for Image Registration · ICCV 2007
Image and video processing
digital topology
0.112011
Topological Well-Composedness and Glamorous Glue: A Digital Gluing Algorithm for Topologically Constrained Front Propagation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.112011
Topological Well-Composedness and Glamorous Glue: A Digital Gluing Algorithm for Topologically Constrained Front Propagation · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2011
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis › image registration
deformable image registration
0.112009
Directly Manipulated Free-Form Deformation Image Registration · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2009
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation
0.112007
Measuring Cortical Thickness Using An Image Domain Local Surface Model And Topology Preserving Segmentation · ICCV 2007
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › constrained image segmentation
topology-preserving segmentation
0.112007
Measuring Cortical Thickness Using An Image Domain Local Surface Model And Topology Preserving Segmentation · ICCV 2007
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
neuroimaging analysis
0.112007
Measuring Cortical Thickness Using An Image Domain Local Surface Model And Topology Preserving Segmentation · ICCV 2007
Geometric modeling and processing › surface fitting
b-spline surface fitting
0.112007
Improved FFD B-Spline Image Registration · ICCV 2007
Geometric modeling and processing › deformation
free-form deformation
0.112007
Improved FFD B-Spline Image Registration · ICCV 2007
Image and video processing › image registration
medical image registration
0.112007
Multi-start Method with Prior Learning for Image Registration · ICCV 2007
Mathematical optimization
global optimization
0.112007
Multi-start Method with Prior Learning for Image Registration · ICCV 2007
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
multi-atlas segmentation
0.012012
From label fusion to correspondence fusion: A new approach to unbiased groupwise registration · CVPR 2012
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
gradient-based optimization
0.012009
Directly Manipulated Free-Form Deformation Image Registration · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior modeling
prior learning
0.012007
Multi-start Method with Prior Learning for Image Registration · ICCV 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervision · 1.5contrastive learning · 1.5bipartite graph · 1.5normalized mutual information · 0.3multisimple points · 0.2marching cubes · 0.2digital gluing · 0.2multi-start optimization · 0.2gradient descent · 0.2preconditioned gradient · 0.2b-spline fitting · 0.2weighted voting · 0.1probability map integration · 0.1learned priors · 0.1image domain local surface model · 0.1correspondence fusion · 0.1learned prior · 0.1gradient-based optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Multimodal Patient Representation Learning with Missing Modalities and Labels
abstract
Multimodal patient representation learning aims to integrate information from multiple modalities and generate comprehensive patient representations for subsequent clinical predictive tasks. However, many existing approaches either presuppose the availability of all modalities and labels for each patient or only deal with missing modalities. In reality, patient data often comes with both missing modalities and labels for various reasons (i.e., the missing modality and label issue). Moreover, multimodal models might over-rely on certain modalities, causing sub-optimal performance when these modalities are absent (i.e., the modality collapse issue). To address these issues, we introduce MUSE: a mutual-consistent graph contrastive learning method. MUSE uses a flexible bipartite graph to represent the patient-modality relationship, which can adapt to various missing modality patterns. To tackle the modality collapse issue, MUSE learns to focus on modality-general and label-decisive features via a mutual-consistent contrastive learning loss. Notably, the unsupervised component of the contrastive objective only requires self-supervision signals, thereby broadening the training scope to incorporate patients with missing labels. We evaluate MUSE on three publicly available datasets: MIMIC-IV, eICU, and ADNI. Results show that MUSE outperforms all baselines, and MUSE+ further elevates the absolute improvement to ~4% by extending the training scope to patients with absent labels.
Zhenbang Wu, Anant Dadu, Nicholas J. Tustison, Brian B. Avants, Mike A. Nalls, Jimeng Sun 0001, Faraz Faghri
ICLR4
2015 Evaluation of automatic neonatal brain segmentation algorithms: The NeoBrainS12 challenge
Ivana Isgum, Manon J. N. L. Benders, Brian B. Avants, Manuel Jorge Cardoso, Serena J. Counsell, Elda Fischi Gomez, Laura Gui, Petra S. Huppi, Karina J. Kersbergen, Antonios Makropoulos, Andrew Melbourne, Pim Moeskops, Christian P. Mol, Maria Deprez, Daniel Rueckert, Julia A. Schnabel, Vedran Srhoj-Egekher, Jue Wu, Siying Wang 0004, Linda S. de Vries, Max A. Viergever
Medical Image Anal.3
2015 The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)
abstract
In this paper we report the set-up and results of the Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) organized in conjunction with the MICCAI 2012 and 2013 conferences. Twenty state-of-the-art tumor segmentation algorithms were applied to a set of 65 multi-contrast MR scans of low- and high-grade glioma patients-manually annotated by up to four raters-and to 65 comparable scans generated using tumor image simulation software. Quantitative evaluations revealed considerable disagreement between the human raters in segmenting various tumor sub-regions (Dice scores in the range 74%-85%), illustrating the difficulty of this task. We found that different algorithms worked best for different sub-regions (reaching performance comparable to human inter-rater variability), but that no single algorithm ranked in the top for all sub-regions simultaneously. Fusing several good algorithms using a hierarchical majority vote yielded segmentations that consistently ranked above all individual algorithms, indicating remaining opportunities for further methodological improvements. The BRATS image data and manual annotations continue to be publicly available through an online evaluation system as an ongoing benchmarking resource.
Bjoern Menze, András Jakab, Stefan Bauer, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Keyvan Farahani, Justin S. Kirby, Yuliya Burren, Nicole Porz, Johannes Slotboom, Roland Wiest, Levente Lanczi, Elizabeth R. Gerstner, Marc-André Weber, Tal Arbel, Brian B. Avants, Nicholas Ayache, Patricia Buendia, D. Louis Collins, Nicolas Cordier, Jason J. Corso, Antonio Criminisi, Tilak Das, Hervé Delingette, Çagatay Demiralp, Christopher R. Durst, Michel Dojat, Senan Doyle, Joana Festa, Florence Forbes, Ezequiel Geremia, Ben Glocker, Polina Golland, Xiaotao Guo, Andac Hamamci, Khan M. Iftekharuddin, Raj Jena, Nigel M. John, Ender Konukoglu, Danial Lashkari, José Antonio Mariz, Raphael Meier, Sérgio Pereira, Doina Precup, Stephen J. Price, Tammy Riklin-Raviv, Syed M. S. Reza, Michael T. Ryan, Duygu Sarikaya, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Hoo-Chang Shin, Jamie Shotton, Carlos A. Silva 0002, Nuno J. Sousa, Nagesh K. Subbanna, Gábor Székely, Thomas J. Taylor, Owen M. Thomas, Nicholas J. Tustison, Gozde Unal, Flor Vasseur, Max Wintermark, Dong Hye Ye, Liang Zhao 0018, Binsheng Zhao, Darko Zikic, Marcel Prastawa, Mauricio Reyes 0001, Koenraad Van Leemput
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging15
2014 Single-Subject Structural Networks with Closed-Form Rotation Invariant Matching Improve Power in Developmental Studies of the Cortex
Benjamin M. Kandel, Danny J. J. Wang, James C. Gee, Brian B. Avants
MICCAI (3)4
2014 Automatic Clustering and Thickness Measurement of Anatomical Variants of the Human Perirhinal Cortex
Long Xie, John Pluta, Hongzhi Wang 0002, Sandhitsu R. Das, Lauren Mancuso, Dasha Kliot, Brian B. Avants, Song-Lin Ding, David A. Wolk, Paul A. Yushkevich
MICCAI (3)7
2013 Fusing Functional Signals by Sparse Canonical Correlation Analysis Improves Network Reproducibility
Jeffrey T. Duda, John A. Detre, Junghoon Kim 0006, James C. Gee, Brian B. Avants
MICCAI (3)5
2012 From label fusion to correspondence fusion: A new approach to unbiased groupwise registration
abstract
Label fusion strategies are used in multi-atlas image segmentation approaches to compute a consensus segmentation of an image, given a set of candidate segmentations produced by registering the image to a set of atlases [19, 11, 8]. Effective label fusion strategies, such as local similarity-weighted voting [1, 13] substantially reduce segmentation errors compared to single-atlas segmentation. This paper extends the label fusion idea to the problem of finding correspondences across a set of images. Instead of computing a consensus segmentation, weighted voting is used to estimate a consensus coordinate map between a target image and a reference space. Two variants of the problem are considered: (1) where correspondences between a set of atlases are known and are propagated to the target image; (2) where correspondences are estimated across a set of images without prior knowledge. Evaluation in synthetic data shows that correspondences recovered by fusion methods are more accurate than those based on registration to a population template. In a 2D example in real MRI data, fusion methods result in more consistent mappings between manual segmentations of the hippocampus.
Paul A. Yushkevich, Hongzhi Wang 0002, John Pluta, Brian B. Avants
CVPR4
2012 Eigenanatomy Improves Detection Power for Longitudinal Cortical Change
Brian B. Avants, Paramveer S. Dhillon, Benjamin M. Kandel, Philip A. Cook, Corey McMillan, Murray Grossman, James C. Gee
MICCAI (3)1
2011 Topological Well-Composedness and Glamorous Glue: A Digital Gluing Algorithm for Topologically Constrained Front Propagation
abstract
We propose a new approach to front propagation algorithms based on a topological variant of well-composedness which contrasts with previous methods based on simple point detection. This provides for a theoretical justification, based on the digital Jordan separation theorem, for digitally "gluing" evolved well-composed objects separated by well-composed curves or surfaces. Additionally, our framework can be extended to more relaxed topologically constrained algorithms based on multisimple points. For both methods this framework has the additional benefit of obviating the requirement for both a user-specified connectivity and a topologically-consistent marching cubes/squares algorithm in meshing the resulting segmentation.
Nicholas J. Tustison, Brian B. Avants, Marcelo Siqueira, James C. Gee
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2
2011 Evaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge
abstract
EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intrapatient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the configuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website (http://empire10.isi.uu.nl). The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed.
Keelin Murphy, Bram van Ginneken, Joseph M. Reinhardt, Sven Kabus, Kai Ding 0003, Kunlin Cao, Kaifang Du, Gary E. Christensen, Vincent Garcia, Tom Vercauteren, Nicholas Ayache, Olivier Commowick, Grégoire Malandain, Ben Glocker, Nikos Paragios, Nassir Navab, Vladlena Gorbunova, Jon Sporring, Marleen de Bruijne, Xiao Han 0011, Mattias P. Heinrich, Julia A. Schnabel, Mark Jenkinson, Cristian Lorenz, Marc Modat, Jamie McClelland, Sébastien Ourselin, Sascha E. A. Muenzing, Max A. Viergever, Dante De Nigris, D. Louis Collins, Tal Arbel, Marta Peroni, Rui Li 0053, Gregory C. Sharp, Alexander Schmidt-Richberg, Jan Ehrhardt, René Werner, Dirk Smeets, Dirk Loeckx, Gang Song, Nicholas J. Tustison, Brian B. Avants, James C. Gee, Marius Staring, Stefan Klein 0001, Berend C. Stoel, Martin Urschler, Manuel Werlberger, Jef Vandemeulebroucke, Simon Rit, David Sarrut, Josien P. W. Pluim
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging44
2010 Sparse Unbiased Analysis of Anatomical Variance in Longitudinal Imaging
Brian B. Avants, Philip A. Cook, Corey McMillan, Murray Grossman, Nicholas J. Tustison, Yuanjie Zheng, James C. Gee
MICCAI (1)1
2010 Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Improving Medical Image Segmentation via Bias Correction
Hongzhi Wang 0002, Sandhitsu R. Das, John Pluta, Caryne Craige, Murat Altinay, Brian B. Avants, Michael Weiner 0001, Susanne G. Mueller, Paul A. Yushkevich
MICCAI (3)6
2010 N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction
abstract
A variant of the popular nonparametric nonuniform intensity normalization (N3) algorithm is proposed for bias field correction. Given the superb performance of N3 and its public availability, it has been the subject of several evaluation studies. These studies have demonstrated the importance of certain parameters associated with the B-spline least-squares fitting. We propose the substitution of a recently developed fast and robust B-spline approximation routine and a modified hierarchical optimization scheme for improved bias field correction over the original N3 algorithm. Similar to the N3 algorithm, we also make the source code, testing, and technical documentation of our contribution, which we denote as "N4ITK," available to the public through the Insight Toolkit of the National Institutes of Health. Performance assessment is demonstrated using simulated data from the publicly available Brainweb database, hyperpolarized (3)He lung image data, and 9.4T postmortem hippocampus data.
Nicholas J. Tustison, Brian B. Avants, Philip A. Cook, Yuanjie Zheng, Alexander Egan, Paul A. Yushkevich, James C. Gee
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging2
2009 Directly Manipulated Free-Form Deformation Image Registration
abstract
Previous contributions to both the research and open source software communities detailed a generalization of a fast scalar field fitting technique for cubic B-splines based on the work originally proposed by Lee . One advantage of our proposed generalized B-spline fitting approach is its immediate application to a class of nonrigid registration techniques frequently employed in medical image analysis. Specifically, these registration techniques fall under the rubric of free-form deformation (FFD) approaches in which the object to be registered is embedded within a B-spline object. The deformation of the B-spline object describes the transformation of the image registration solution. Representative of this class of techniques, and often cited within the relevant community, is the formulation of Rueckert who employed cubic splines with normalized mutual information to study breast deformation. Similar techniques from various groups provided incremental novelty in the form of disparate explicit regularization terms, as well as the employment of various image metrics and tailored optimization methods. For several algorithms, the underlying gradient-based optimization retained the essential characteristics of Rueckert's original contribution. The contribution which we provide in this paper is two-fold: 1) the observation that the generic FFD framework is intrinsically susceptible to problematic energy topographies and 2) that the standard gradient used in FFD image registration can be modified to a well-understood preconditioned form which substantially improves performance. This is demonstrated with theoretical discussion and comparative evaluation experimentation.
Nicholas J. Tustison, Brian B. Avants, James C. Gee
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2
2008 Cardiac Medial Modeling and Time-Course Heart Wall Thickness Analysis
Brian B. Avants, Alejandro F. Frangi, Federico Sukno, James C. Gee, Paul A. Yushkevich
MICCAI (2)2
2008 Shape-Based Alignment of Hippocampal Subfields: Evaluation in Postmortem MRI
Paul A. Yushkevich, Brian B. Avants, John Pluta, David Minkoff, John A. Detre, Murray Grossman, James C. Gee
MICCAI (1)2
2008 Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain
Brian B. Avants, Charles L. Epstein, Murray Grossman, James C. Gee
Medical Image Anal.1
2007 Measuring Cortical Thickness Using An Image Domain Local Surface Model And Topology Preserving Segmentation
abstract
We present a measure of gray matter (GM) thickness based on local surface models in the image domain. Thickness is measured by integrating GM probability maps along the white matter (WM) surface normal direction. The method is simple to implement and allows statistical tests to be performed in the gray matter volume. A novel topology preserving segmentation method is introduced that is able to accurately recover GM in deep sulci. We apply this methodology to a longitudinal study of gray matter atrophy in a patient cohort diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum disorders. Following image-based normalization of GM thickness maps, results show significant reduction in cortical thickness in several Brodmann areas spanning temporal, parietal and frontal lobes across subjects.
Sandhitsu R. Das, Brian B. Avants, Murray Grossman, James C. Gee
ICCV2
2007 Multi-start Method with Prior Learning for Image Registration
abstract
We propose an efficient image registration strategy that is based on learned prior distributions of transformation parameters. These priors are used to constrain a finite- time multi-start optimization method. Motivation for this approach comes from the fact that standard affine brain image registration methods, especially those based on gradient descent optimization alone, are affected by the initial search position. While global optimization methods can resolve this problem, they are are often very time consuming. Our goal is to build an explicit prior model of the gap between a typical registration solution and the solution gained by a global optimization method. We use this learned prior model to restrict randomized search in the relevant parameter space surrounding the initial solution. Global optimization in this restricted parameter space provides, in finite time, results that are superior to both gradient descent and the general multi-start strategy. The performance of our method is illustrated on a data set of 67 elderly and neurodegenerative brains. Our novel learning strategy and the associated registration method are shown to outperform other approaches. Theoretical, synthetic and real-world examples illustrate this improvement.
Gang Song, Brian B. Avants, James C. Gee
ICCV2
2007 Improved FFD B-Spline Image Registration
abstract
Due to their computational efficiency and other salient properties, B-splines form the basis not only in comprising the de facto standard for curve and surface representation but also for various nonrigid registration techniques frequently employed in medical image analysis. These registration techniques fall under the rubric of Free-Form Deformation (FFD) approaches in which the object to be registered is embedded within a B-spline object. The deformation of the B-spline object represents the transformation of the registration. Representative, and often cited within the relevant community, of this class of techniques is the formulation of Rueckert et. al [7] who employed cubic splines with normalized mutual information to study breast deformation. Similar techniques from various groups provided incremental novelty in the form of disparate explicit regularization terms as well as the employment of various image metrics and tailored optimization methods. For several algorithms, the underlying gradient-based optimization retained its essential characteristics since Rueckert's incarnation. We assert that such a straightforward gradient-learning is suboptimal in certain cases and to remedy this sub-optimality, we propose a fitting-based strategy for registration in the spirit of Thirion 's Demons [14] and directly manipulated free-form deformations [2], which takes advantage of our previously developed generalized B-spline fitting algorithm [17].
Nicholas J. Tustison, Brian B. Avants, James C. Gee
ICCV2
2007 Spatiotemporal Normalization for Longitudinal Analysis of Gray Matter Atrophy in Frontotemporal Dementia
Brian B. Avants, Chivon Anderson, Murray Grossman, James C. Gee
MICCAI (2)1
2007 Multivariate Normalization with Symmetric Diffeomorphisms for Multivariate Studies
Brian B. Avants, Jeffrey T. Duda, Hui Zhang 0005, James C. Gee
MICCAI (1)1
2007 Neuroinformatics for Genome-Wide 3-D Gene Expression Mapping in the Mouse Brain
abstract
Large scale gene expression studies in the mammalian brain offer the promise of understanding the topology, networks and ultimately the function of its complex anatomy, opening previously unexplored avenues in neuroscience. High-throughput methods permit genome-wide searches to discover genes that are uniquely expressed in brain circuits and regions that control behavior. Previous gene expression mapping studies in model organisms have employed situ hybridization (ISH), a technique that uses labeled nucleic acid probes to bind to specific mRNA transcripts in tissue sections. A key requirement for this effort is the development of fast and robust algorithms for anatomically mapping and quantifying gene expression for ISH. We describe a neuroinformatics pipeline for automatically mapping expression profiles of ISH data and its use to produce the first genomic scale 3-D mapping of gene expression in a mammalian brain. The pipeline is fully automated and adaptable to other organisms and tissues. Our automated study of over 20,000 genes indicates that at least 78.8 percent are expressed at some level in the adult C56BL/6J mouse brain. In addition to providing a platform for genomic scale search, high-resolution images and visualization tools for expression analysis are available at the Allen Brain Atlas web site (http://www.brain-map.org).
Lydia Ng, Sayan D. Pathak, Chihchau Kuan, Christopher Lau, Hong-wei Dong, Andrew Sodt, Chinh Dang, Brian B. Avants, Paul A. Yushkevich, James C. Gee, David R. Haynor, Ed S. Lein, Allan Jones, Michael Hawrylycz
IEEE ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform.8
2007 High-Dimensional Spatial Normalization of Diffusion Tensor Images Improves the Detection of White Matter Differences: An Example Study Using Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
abstract
Spatial normalization of diffusion tensor images plays a key role in voxel-based analysis of white matter (WM) group differences. Currently, it has been achieved using low-dimensional registration methods in the large majority of clinical studies. This paper aims to motivate the use of high-dimensional normalization approaches by generating evidence of their impact on the findings of such studies. Using an ongoing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) study, we evaluated three normalization methods representing the current range of available approaches: low-dimensional normalization using the fractional anisotropy (FA), high-dimensional normalization using the FA, and high-dimensional normalization using full tensor information. Each method was assessed in terms of its ability to detect significant differences between ALS patients and controls. Our findings suggest that inadequate normalization with low-dimensional approaches can result in insufficient removal of shape differences which in turn can confound FA differences in a complex manner, and that utilizing high-dimensional normalization can both significantly minimize the confounding effect of shape differences to FA differences and provide a more complete description of WM differences in terms of both size and tissue architecture differences. We also found that high-dimensional approaches, by leveraging full tensor features instead of tensor-derived indices, can further improve the alignment of WM tracts.
Hui Zhang 0005, Brian B. Avants, Paul A. Yushkevich, John H. Woo, Sumei Wang, L. F. McCluskey, L. B. Elman, Elias R. Melhem, James C. Gee
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging2
2006 Integrated Graph Cuts for Brain MRI Segmentation
Zhuang Song, Nicholas J. Tustison, Brian B. Avants, James C. Gee
MICCAI (2)3
2006 Lagrangian frame diffeomorphic image registration: Morphometric comparison of human and chimpanzee cortex
Brian B. Avants, P. Thomas Schoenemann, James C. Gee
Medical Image Anal.1
2005 An Automated Approach to Connectivity-Based Partitioning of Brain Structures
Philip A. Cook, Hui Zhang 0005, Brian B. Avants, Paul A. Yushkevich, Daniel C. Alexander, James C. Gee, Olga Ciccarelli, Alan J. Thompson
MICCAI3
2005 Towards a Dynamic Model of Pulmonary Parenchymal Deformation: Evaluation of Methods for Temporal Reparameterization of Lung Data
Tessa A. Sundaram, Brian B. Avants, James C. Gee
MICCAI (2)2
2004 A Dynamic Model of Average Lung Deformation Using Capacity-Based Reparameterization and Shape Averaging of Lung MR Images
Tessa A. Sundaram, Brian B. Avants, James C. Gee
MICCAI (2)2
2002 Shape Characterization of the Corpus Callosum in Schizophrenia Using Template Deformation
Abraham Dubb, Brian B. Avants, Ruben C. Gur, James C. Gee
AMIA2
2002 Shape Characterization of the Corpus Callosum in Schizophrenia Using Template Deformation
Abraham Dubb, Brian B. Avants, Ruben C. Gur, James C. Gee
MICCAI (2)2
2001 Computing Match Functions for Curves in R2 and R3 by Refining Polyline Approximations
Brian B. Avants, Marcelo Siqueira, James C. Gee
MICCAI1
2000 An Adaptive Minimal Path Generation Technique for Vessel Tracking in CTA/CE-MRA Volume Images
Brian B. Avants, James P. Williams 0001
MICCAI1