Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhi Chen 0028

dblp:05/1539-28 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 3 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 41% Network security · 41% Malware analysis · 18%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 78% Time series and sequential data · 22%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention › intrusion detection › alert processing
alert triage
0.812024
True Attacks, Attack Attempts, or Benign Triggers? An Empirical Measurement of Network Alerts in a Security Operations Center · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection
0.812024
True Attacks, Attack Attempts, or Benign Triggers? An Empirical Measurement of Network Alerts in a Security Operations Center · USENIX Security Symposium 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack
0.712023
Time-Aware Gradient Attack on Dynamic Network Link Prediction · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.712023
RobustECD: Enhancement of Network Structure for Robust Community Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
graph adversarial attack
0.712023
Time-Aware Gradient Attack on Dynamic Network Link Prediction · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
RobustECD: Enhancement of Network Structure for Robust Community Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Data mining › structured data mining › graph mining
community detection
0.712023
RobustECD: Enhancement of Network Structure for Robust Community Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Data mining › structured data mining
graph mining
0.712023
RobustECD: Enhancement of Network Structure for Robust Community Detection · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
backdoor attack
0.712023
Jigsaw Puzzle: Selective Backdoor Attack to Subvert Malware Classifiers · SP 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack › backdoor poisoning attacks
clean-label backdoor attack
0.712023
Jigsaw Puzzle: Selective Backdoor Attack to Subvert Malware Classifiers · SP 2023
Malware analysis
malware classification
0.712023
Jigsaw Puzzle: Selective Backdoor Attack to Subvert Malware Classifiers · SP 2023
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection
0.412019
Lifelong Anomaly Detection Through Unlearning · CCS 2019
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › anomaly detection
continual anomaly detection
0.412019
Lifelong Anomaly Detection Through Unlearning · CCS 2019
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › backdoor attack
backdoor defense
0.212023
Jigsaw Puzzle: Selective Backdoor Attack to Subvert Malware Classifiers · SP 2023
Software maintenance and evolution
system reliability
0.112019
Lifelong Anomaly Detection Through Unlearning · CCS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical measurement · 1.5similarity ensemble · 1.3genetic algorithm · 1.3unlearning · 0.8generative model · 0.8catastrophic forgetting mitigation · 0.8gradient-based attack · 0.7dynamic network embedding · 0.7bytecode gadget harvesting · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 True Attacks, Attack Attempts, or Benign Triggers? An Empirical Measurement of Network Alerts in a Security Operations Center
Zhi Chen 0028, Chenkai Wang 0001, Zhenning Zhang, Sushruth Booma, Phuong Cao, Constantin Adam, Alexander Withers, Zbigniew T. Kalbarczyk, Ravishankar K. Iyer, Gang Wang 0011
USENIX Security Symposium2
2023 Jigsaw Puzzle: Selective Backdoor Attack to Subvert Malware Classifiers
abstract
Malware classifiers are subject to training-time exploitation due to the need to regularly retrain using samples collected from the wild. Recent work has demonstrated the feasibility of backdoor attacks against malware classifiers, and yet the stealthiness of such attacks is not well understood. In this paper, we focus on Android malware classifiers and investigate backdoor attacks under the clean-label setting (i.e., attackers do not have complete control over the training process or the labeling of poisoned data). Empirically, we show that existing backdoor attacks against malware classifiers are still detectable by recent defenses such as MNTD. To improve stealthiness, we propose a new attack, Jigsaw Puzzle (JP), based on the key observation that malware authors have little to no incentive to protect any other authors’ malware but their own. As such, Jigsaw Puzzle learns a trigger to complement the latent patterns of the malware author’s samples, and activates the backdoor only when the trigger and the latent pattern are pieced together in a sample. We further focus on realizable triggers in the problem space (e.g., software code) using bytecode gadgets broadly harvested from benign software. Our evaluation confirms that Jigsaw Puzzle is effective as a backdoor, remains stealthy against state-of-the-art defenses, and is a threat in realistic settings that depart from reasoning about feature-space-only attacks. We conclude by exploring promising approaches to improve backdoor defenses.
Zhi Chen 0028, Jacopo Cortellazzi, Feargus Pendlebury, Kevin Tu, Fabio Pierazzi, Lorenzo Cavallaro, Gang Wang 0011
SP2
2023 Time-Aware Gradient Attack on Dynamic Network Link Prediction
abstract
In network link prediction, it is possible to hide a target link from being predicted with a small perturbation on network structure. This observation may be exploited in many real world scenarios, for example, to preserve privacy, or to exploit financial security. There have been many recent studies to generate adversarial examples to mislead deep learning models on graph data. However, none of the previous work has considered the dynamic nature of real-world systems. In this work, we present the first study of adversarial attack on dynamic network link prediction (DNLP). The proposed attack method, namely time-aware gradient attack (TGA), utilizes the gradient information generated by deep dynamic network embedding (DDNE) across different snapshots to rewire a few links, so as to make DDNE fail to predict target links. We implement TGA in two ways: one is based on traversal search, namely TGA-Tra; and the other is simplified with greedy search for efficiency, namely TGA-Gre. We conduct comprehensive experiments which show the outstanding performance of TGA in attacking DNLP algorithms.
Jinyin Chen, Jian Zhang 0023, Zhi Chen 0028, Min Du 0003, Qi Xuan 0001
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.3
2023 RobustECD: Enhancement of Network Structure for Robust Community Detection
abstract
Community detection, which focuses on clustering vertex interactions, plays a significant role in network analysis. However, it also faces numerous challenges like missing data and adversarial attack. How to further improve the performance and robustness of community detection for real-world networks has raised great concerns. In this paper, we explore robust community detection by enhancing network structure, with two generic algorithms presented: one is named robust community detection via genetic algorithm (RobustECDGA), in which the modularity and the number of clusters are combined in a fitness function to find the optimal structure enhancement scheme; the other is called robust community detection via similarity ensemble (RobustECD-SE), integrating multiple information of community structures captured by various vertex similarities, which scales well on large-scale networks. Comprehensive experiments on real-world networks demonstrate, by comparing with two traditional enhancement strategies, that the new methods help six representative community detection algorithms achieve more significant performance improvement. Moreover, experiments on the corresponding adversarial networks indicate that the new methods could also optimize the network structure to a certain extent, achieving stronger robustness against adversarial attack. The source code of this paper is released on https://github.com/jjzhou012/robustECD release.
Jiajun Zhou 0003, Zhi Chen 0028, Min Du 0003, Lihong Chen, Shanqing Yu, Guanrong Chen, Qi Xuan 0001
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2019 Lifelong Anomaly Detection Through Unlearning
abstract
Anomaly detection is essential towards ensuring system security and reliability. Powered by constantly generated system data, deep learning has been found both effective and flexible to use, with its ability to extract patterns without much domain knowledge. Existing anomaly detection research focuses on a scenario referred to as zero-positive, which means that the detection model is only trained for normal (i.e., negative) data. In a real application scenario, there may be additional manually inspected positive data provided after the system is deployed. We refer to this scenario as lifelong anomaly detection. However, we find that existing approaches are not easy to adopt such new knowledge to improve system performance. In this work, we are the first to explore the lifelong anomaly detection problem, and propose novel approaches to handle corresponding challenges. In particular, we propose a framework called unlearning, which can effectively correct the model when a false negative (or a false positive) is labeled. To this aim, we develop several novel techniques to tackle two challenges referred to as exploding loss and catastrophic forgetting. In addition, we abstract a theoretical framework based on generative models. Under this framework, our unlearning approach can be presented in a generic way to be applied to most zero-positive deep learning-based anomaly detection algorithms to turn them into corresponding lifelong anomaly detection solutions. We evaluate our approach using two state-of-the-art zero-positive deep learning anomaly detection architectures and three real-world tasks. The results show that the proposed approach is able to significantly reduce the number of false positives and false negatives through unlearning.
Min Du 0003, Zhi Chen 0028, Chang Liu 0021, Rajvardhan Oak, Dawn Song
CCS2