Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xuan Zhu 0006

dblp:05/2378-6 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-8422-2828ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 52% Knowledge graphs · 32% Web and social media mining · 16%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 60% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 20%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
compositional semantics
0.212015
Learning Tag Embeddings and Tag-specific Composition Functions in Recursive Neural Network · ACL (1) 2015
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.212015
Incorporating Domain and Sentiment Supervision in Representation Learning for Domain Adaptation · IJCAI 2015
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain-invariant representation learning
0.212015
Incorporating Domain and Sentiment Supervision in Representation Learning for Domain Adaptation · IJCAI 2015
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recursive neural network
0.212015
Learning Tag Embeddings and Tag-specific Composition Functions in Recursive Neural Network · ACL (1) 2015
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
representation learning for domain adaptation
0.212015
Incorporating Domain and Sentiment Supervision in Representation Learning for Domain Adaptation · IJCAI 2015
Information retrieval › question answering
community question answering
0.212015
Detecting Promotion Campaigns in Community Question Answering · IJCAI 2015
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph embedding
0.212015
Learning Entity and Relation Embeddings for Knowledge Graph Completion · AAAI 2015
Knowledge graphs
link prediction
0.212015
Learning Entity and Relation Embeddings for Knowledge Graph Completion · AAAI 2015
Information retrieval › user behavior
mouse movement analysis
0.212015
Different Users, Different Opinions: Predicting Search Satisfaction with Mouse Movement Information · SIGIR 2015
Web and social media mining
user behavior analysis
0.212015
Different Users, Different Opinions: Predicting Search Satisfaction with Mouse Movement Information · SIGIR 2015
Information retrieval › evaluation
user satisfaction prediction
0.212015
Different Users, Different Opinions: Predicting Search Satisfaction with Mouse Movement Information · SIGIR 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph analysis · 0.4translation-based embedding · 0.2tag embedding · 0.2sentiment analysis · 0.2recursive neural network · 0.2motif extraction · 0.2entity projection · 0.2domain supervision · 0.2distribution-based selection · 0.2distance-based selection · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Learning Entity and Relation Embeddings for Knowledge Graph Completion
abstract
Knowledge graph completion aims to perform link prediction between entities. In this paper, we consider the approach of knowledge graph embeddings. Recently, models such as TransE and TransH build entity and relation embeddings by regarding a relation as translation from head entity to tail entity. We note that these models simply put both entities and relations within the same semantic space. In fact, an entity may have multiple aspects and various relations may focus on different aspects of entities, which makes a common space insufficient for modeling. In this paper, we propose TransR to build entity and relation embeddings in separate entity space and relation spaces. Afterwards, we learn embeddings by first projecting entities from entity space to corresponding relation space and then building translations between projected entities. In experiments, we evaluate our models on three tasks including link prediction, triple classification and relational fact extraction. Experimental results show significant and consistent improvements compared to state-of-the-art baselines including TransE and TransH.
Yankai Lin 0001, Zhiyuan Liu 0001, Maosong Sun 0001, Yang Liu 0107, Xuan Zhu 0006
AAAI5
2015 Learning Tag Embeddings and Tag-specific Composition Functions in Recursive Neural Network
abstract
Qiao Qian, Bo Tian, Minlie Huang, Yang Liu, Xuan Zhu, Xiaoyan Zhu. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2015.
Qiao Qian, Minlie Huang, Yang Liu 0107, Xuan Zhu 0006, Xiaoyan Zhu 0001
ACL (1)5
2015 Detecting Promotion Campaigns in Community Question Answering
Xin Li 0016, Yiqun Liu 0001, Min Zhang 0006, Shaoping Ma, Xuan Zhu 0006, Jiashen Sun
IJCAI5
2015 Incorporating Domain and Sentiment Supervision in Representation Learning for Domain Adaptation
Minlie Huang, Jiashen Sun, Xuan Zhu 0006
IJCAI4
2015 Different Users, Different Opinions: Predicting Search Satisfaction with Mouse Movement Information
abstract
Satisfaction prediction is one of the prime concerns in search performance evaluation. It is a non-trivial task for two major reasons: (1) The definition of satisfaction is rather subjective and different users may have different opinions in satisfaction judgement. (2) Most existing studies on satisfaction prediction mainly rely on users' click-through or query reformulation behaviors but there are many sessions without such kind of interactions. To shed light on these research questions, we construct an experimental search engine that could collect users' satisfaction feedback as well as mouse click-through/movement data. Different from existing studies, we compare for the first time search users' and external assessors' opinions on satisfaction. We find that search users pay more attention to the utility of results while external assessors emphasize on the efforts spent in search sessions. Inspired by recent studies in predicting result relevance based on mouse movement patterns (namely motifs), we propose to estimate the utilities of search results and the efforts in search sessions with motifs extracted from mouse movement data on search result pages (SERPs). Besides the existing frequency-based motif selection method, two novel selection strategies (distance-based and distribution-based) are also adopted to extract high quality motifs for satisfaction prediction. Experimental results on over 1,000 user sessions show that the proposed strategies outperform existing methods and also have promising generalization capability for different users and queries.
Yiqun Liu 0001, Jinhui Tang 0001, Jiashen Sun, Min Zhang 0006, Shaoping Ma, Xuan Zhu 0006
SIGIR7
2015 Microblog Sentiment Analysis with Emoticon Space Model
Yiqun Liu 0001, Huan-Bo Luan, Jiashen Sun, Xuan Zhu 0006, Min Zhang 0006, Shaoping Ma
J. Comput. Sci. Technol.5