Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuwei Xu 0004

dblp:05/9079-4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph reasoning
inductive knowledge graph reasoning
0.812024
TIGER: Training Inductive Graph Neural Network for Large-scale Knowledge Graph Reasoning · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph reasoning
0.812024
TIGER: Training Inductive Graph Neural Network for Large-scale Knowledge Graph Reasoning · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subgraph slicing · 0.8subgraph caching · 0.8graph neural network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 TIGER: Training Inductive Graph Neural Network for Large-scale Knowledge Graph Reasoning
abstract
Knowledge Graph (KG) Reasoning plays a vital role in various applications by predicting missing facts from existing knowledge. Inductive KG reasoning approaches based on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have shown impressive performance, particularly when reasoning with unseen entities and dynamic KGs. However, such state-of-the-art KG reasoning approaches encounter efficiency and scalability challenges on large-scale KGs due to the high computational costs associated with subgraph extraction - a key component in inductive KG reasoning. To address the computational challenge, we introduce TIGER, an inductive GNN training framework tailored for large-scale KG reasoning. TIGER employs a novel, efficient streaming procedure that facilitates rapid subgraph slicing and dynamic subgraph caching to minimize the cost of subgraph extraction. The fundamental challenge in TIGER lies in the optimal subgraph slicing problem, which we prove to be NP-hard. We propose a novel two-stage algorithm SiGMa to solve the problem practically. By decoupling the complicated problem into two classical ones, SiGMa achieves low computational complexity and high slice reuse. We also propose four new benchmarks for robust evaluation of large-scale inductive KG reasoning, the biggest of which performs on the Freebase KG (encompassing 86M entities, 285M edges). Through comprehensive experiments on state-of-the-art GNN-based KG reasoning models, we demonstrate that TIGER significantly reduces the running time of subgraph extraction, achieving an average 3.7× speedup relative to the basic training procedure.
Kai Wang 0057, Yuwei Xu 0004, Siqiang Luo
Proc. VLDB Endow.2