Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Laura Florian

dblp:06/10398 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 70% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
high-dimensional data visualization
0.112011
Improved Similarity Trees and their Application to Visual Data Classification · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
visual classification
0.112011
Improved Similarity Trees and their Application to Visual Data Classification · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics › exploratory data analysis
visual data mining
0.112011
Improved Similarity Trees and their Application to Visual Data Classification · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011
Visualization and visual analytics › dimensionality reduction
multidimensional projection
0.012011
Improved Similarity Trees and their Application to Visual Data Classification · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neighbor joining · 0.1algorithm acceleration · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Improved Similarity Trees and their Application to Visual Data Classification
abstract
An alternative form to multidimensional projections for the visual analysis of data represented in multidimensional spaces is the deployment of similarity trees, such as Neighbor Joining trees. They organize data objects on the visual plane emphasizing their levels of similarity with high capability of detecting and separating groups and subgroups of objects. Besides this similarity-based hierarchical data organization, some of their advantages include the ability to decrease point clutter; high precision; and a consistent view of the data set during focusing, offering a very intuitive way to view the general structure of the data set as well as to drill down to groups and subgroups of interest. Disadvantages of similarity trees based on neighbor joining strategies include their computational cost and the presence of virtual nodes that utilize too much of the visual space. This paper presents a highly improved version of the similarity tree technique. The improvements in the technique are given by two procedures. The first is a strategy that replaces virtual nodes by promoting real leaf nodes to their place, saving large portions of space in the display and maintaining the expressiveness and precision of the technique. The second improvement is an implementation that significantly accelerates the algorithm, impacting its use for larger data sets. We also illustrate the applicability of the technique in visual data mining, showing its advantages to support visual classification of data sets, with special attention to the case of image classification. We demonstrate the capabilities of the tree for analysis and iterative manipulation and employ those capabilities to support evolving to a satisfactory data organization and classification.
Jose Gustavo Paiva, Laura Florian, Hélio Pedrini, Guilherme P. Telles, Rosane Minghim
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.2