Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ryan M. Ames

dblp:06/10673 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-1432-5629ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
gene family evolution
0.422015
DupliPHY-Web: a web server for DupliPHY and DupliPHY-ML · Bioinform. 2015
Determining the evolutionary history of gene families · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution › gene family evolution
gene duplication and loss inference
0.212015
DupliPHY-Web: a web server for DupliPHY and DupliPHY-ML · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › evolutionary history reconstruction
ancestral sequence reconstruction
0.012012
Determining the evolutionary history of gene families · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
0.012012
Determining the evolutionary history of gene families · Bioinform. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum likelihood · 0.4parsimony · 0.2weighted parsimony · 0.1markov model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 DupliPHY-Web: a web server for DupliPHY and DupliPHY-ML
abstract
SUMMARY: Gene duplication and loss are important processes in the evolution of gene families. Moreover, growth of families by duplication and retention is an important mechanism by which organisms gain new functions. Therefore the ability to infer the evolutionary histories of families is an important step in understanding the evolution of function. We have recently developed DupliPHY, a software tool to infer gene family histories using parsimony and maximum likelihood. Here, we present DupliPHY-Web a web server for DupliPHY that implements additional maximum likelihood functionality and provides users an intuitive interface to run DupliPHY. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DupliPHY-Web is available at www.bioinf.manchester.ac.uk/dupliphy/ CONTACT: : [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Ryan M. Ames, Simon C. Lovell
Bioinform.1
2012 Determining the evolutionary history of gene families
abstract
MOTIVATION: Recent large-scale studies of individuals within a population have demonstrated that there is widespread variation in copy number in many gene families. In addition, there is increasing evidence that the variation in gene copy number can give rise to substantial phenotypic effects. In some cases, these variations have been shown to be adaptive. These observations show that a full understanding of the evolution of biological function requires an understanding of gene gain and gene loss. Accurate, robust evolutionary models of gain and loss events are, therefore, required. RESULTS: We have developed weighted parsimony and maximum likelihood methods for inferring gain and loss events. To test these methods, we have used Markov models of gain and loss to simulate data with known properties. We examine three models: a simple birth-death model, a single rate model and a birth-death innovation model with parameters estimated from Drosophila genome data. We find that for all simulations maximum likelihood-based methods are very accurate for reconstructing the number of duplication events on the phylogenetic tree, and that maximum likelihood and weighted parsimony have similar accuracy for reconstructing the ancestral state. Our implementations are robust to different model parameters and provide accurate inferences of ancestral states and the number of gain and loss events. For ancestral reconstruction, we recommend weighted parsimony because it has similar accuracy to maximum likelihood, but is much faster. For inferring the number of individual gene loss or gain events, maximum likelihood is noticeably more accurate, albeit at greater computational cost. AVAILABILITY: www.bioinf.manchester.ac.uk/dupliphy CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Ryan M. Ames, Daniel Money, Vikramsinh P. Ghatge, Simon Whelan, Simon C. Lovell
Bioinform.1