Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julia Bear
dblp:06/10916
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing › peer production
wikipedia contribution |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributions · CSCW 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
international survey · 0.1hypothesis testing · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributionsabstractA recent survey of contributors to Wikipedia found that less than 15% of contributors are women. This gender contribution gap has received significant attention from both researchers and the media. A panel of researchers and practitioners has offered several insights and opinions as to why a gender gap exists in contributions despite gender anonymity online. The gender research literature suggests that the difference in contribution rates could be due to three factors: (1) the high levels of conflict in discussions, (2) dislike of critical environments, and (3) lack of confidence in editing other contributors' work. This paper examines these hypotheses regarding the existence of the gender gap in contribution by using data from an international survey of 176,192 readers, contributors, and former contributors to Wikipedia, including measures of demographics, education, motivation, and participation. Implications for improving the design and culture of online communities to be more gender inclusive are discussed. Benjamin C. Collier, Julia Bear |
CSCW | 2 |