Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhen Jia 0002

dblp:06/180-2 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-5759-5555ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 44% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
temporal question answering
0.812024
Faithful Temporal Question Answering over Heterogeneous Sources · WWW 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › temporal information extraction
temporal constraint extraction
0.212024
Faithful Temporal Question Answering over Heterogeneous Sources · WWW 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

question generation · 0.8neural inference · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Faithful Temporal Question Answering over Heterogeneous Sources
abstract
Temporal question answering (QA) involves time constraints, with phrases such as "... in 2019" or "... before COVID". In the former, time is an explicit condition, in the latter it is implicit. State-of-the-art methods have limitations along three dimensions. First, with neural inference, time constraints are merely soft-matched, giving room to invalid or inexplicable answers. Second, questions with implicit time are poorly supported. Third, answers come from a single source: either a knowledge base (KB) or a text corpus. We propose a temporal QA system that addresses these shortcomings. First, it enforces temporal constraints for faithful answering with tangible evidence. Second, it properly handles implicit questions. Third, it operates over heterogeneous sources, covering KB, text and web tables in a unified manner. The method has three stages: (i) understanding the question and its temporal conditions, (ii) retrieving evidence from all sources, and (iii) faithfully answering the question. As implicit questions are sparse in prior benchmarks, we introduce a principled method for generating diverse questions. Experiments show superior performance over a suite of baselines.
Zhen Jia 0002, Philipp Christmann, Gerhard Weikum
WWW1
2021 Complex Temporal Question Answering on Knowledge Graphs
abstract
Question answering over knowledge graphs (KG-QA) is a vital topic in IR. Questions with temporal intent are a special class of practical importance, but have not received much attention in research. This work presents EXAQT, the first end-to-end system for answering complex temporal questions that have multiple entities and predicates, and associated temporal conditions. EXAQT answers natural language questions over KGs in two stages, one geared towards high recall, the other towards precision at top ranks. The first step computes question-relevant compact subgraphs within the KG, and judiciously enhances them with pertinent temporal facts, using Group Steiner Trees and fine-tuned BERT models. The second step constructs relational graph convolutional networks (R-GCNs) from the first step's output, and enhances the R-GCNs with time-aware entity embeddings and attention over temporal relations. We evaluate EXAQT on TimeQuestions, a large dataset of 16k temporal questions we compiled from a variety of general purpose KG-QA benchmarks. Results show that EXAQT outperforms three state-of-the-art systems for answering complex questions over KGs, thereby justifying specialized treatment of temporal QA.
Zhen Jia 0002, Soumajit Pramanik, Rishiraj Saha Roy, Gerhard Weikum
CIKM1
2018 TEQUILA: Temporal Question Answering over Knowledge Bases
abstract
Question answering over knowledge bases (KB-QA) poses challenges in handling complex questions that need to be decomposed into sub-questions. An important case, addressed here, is that of temporal questions, where cues for temporal relations need to be discovered and handled. We present TEQUILA, an enabler method for temporal QA that can run on top of any KB-QA engine. TEQUILA has four stages. It detects if a question has temporal intent. It decomposes and rewrites the question into non-temporal sub-questions and temporal constraints. Answers to sub-questions are then retrieved from the underlying KB-QA engine. Finally, TEQUILA uses constraint reasoning on temporal intervals to compute final answers to the full question. Comparisons against state-of-the-art baselines show the viability of our method.
Zhen Jia 0002, Abdalghani Abujabal, Rishiraj Saha Roy, Jannik Strötgen, Gerhard Weikum
CIKM1
2015 Entity Recognition and Linking in Chinese Search Queries
Jinwei Yuan, Yan Yang 0001, Zhen Jia 0002, Hongfeng Yin, Junfu Huang
NLPCC3