In this paper we establish new expressiveness results for indeterminate datatlow primitives. We consider split primitives with three differing fairness assumptions and show that they are strictly inequivalent in expressive power. We also show that the ability to announce internal choices enhances the expressive power of two of the primitives. These results are proved using a very crude notion of observation and thus apply in any reasonable theory of process equivalence.

We analyze the relative expressive power of variants of the indeterminate fair merge operator in the context of static dataflow. We establish that there are three different, provably inequivalent, forms of unbounded indeterminacy. In particular, we show that the well-known fair merge primitive cannot be expressed with just unbounded indeterminacy. Our proofs are based on a simple trace semantics and on identifying properties of the behaviors of networks that are invariant under network composition. The properties we consider in this paper are all generalizations of monotonicity.

Expressiveness results for indeterminate data flow primitives are established. Choice primitives with three differing fairness assumptions are considered, and it is shown that they are strictly inequivalent in expressive power. It is also shown that the ability to announce choices enhances the expressive power of two of the primitives. These results are proved using a very crude semantics and will thus apply in any reasonable theory of process equivalence.>