Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bertrand Servin

dblp:06/8886 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0001-5141-0913ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly validation
0.112010
Statistical confidence measures for genome maps: application to the validation of genome assemblies · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome analysis
genome mapping
0.112010
Statistical confidence measures for genome maps: application to the validation of genome assemblies · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112010
Statistical confidence measures for genome maps: application to the validation of genome assemblies · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › physical mapping
radiation hybrid mapping
0.112010
Statistical confidence measures for genome maps: application to the validation of genome assemblies · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical confidence measures · 0.1sampling algorithm · 0.1comparative model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Statistical confidence measures for genome maps: application to the validation of genome assemblies
abstract
MOTIVATION: Genome maps are imperative to address the genetic basis of the biology of an organism. While a growing number of genomes are being sequenced providing the ultimate genome maps-this being done at an even faster pace now using new generation sequencers-the process of constructing intermediate maps to build and validate a genome assembly remains an important component for producing complete genome sequences. However, current mapping approach lack statistical confidence measures necessary to identify precisely relevant inconsistencies between a genome map and an assembly. RESULTS: We propose new methods to derive statistical measures of confidence on genome maps using a comparative model for radiation hybrid data. We describe algorithms allowing to (i) sample from a distribution of maps and (ii) exploit this distribution to construct robust maps. We provide an example of application of these methods on a dog dataset that demonstrates the interest of our approach. AVAILABILITY: Methods are implemented in two freely available softwares: Carthagene (http://www.inra.fr/mia/T/CarthaGene/) and a companion software (metamap, available at: http://snp.toulouse.inra.fr/~servin/index.cgi/Metamap).
Bertrand Servin, Simon de Givry, Thomas Faraut
Bioinform.1