Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kurt Woodham
dblp:07/6085
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › test adequacy › coverage criteria
structural coverage criteria |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | ReqsCov: A Tool for Measuring Test-Adequacy over Requirements · ASE 2008 |
Software testing
test adequacy |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | ReqsCov: A Tool for Measuring Test-Adequacy over Requirements · ASE 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear temporal logic · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | ReqsCov: A Tool for Measuring Test-Adequacy over RequirementsabstractWhen creating test cases for software, a common approach is to create tests that exercise requirements. Determining the adequacy of test cases, however, is generally done through inspection or indirectly by measuring structural coverage of an executable artifact (such as source code or a software model). We present ReqsCov, a tool to directly measure requirements coverage provided by test cases. ReqsCov allows users to measure Linear Temporal Logic requirements coverage using three increasingly rigorous requirements coverage metrics: naive coverage, antecedent coverage, and Unique First Cause coverage. By measuring requirements coverage, users are given insight into the quality of test suites beyond what is available when solely using structural coverage metrics over an implementation. Matthew Staats, Weijia Deng, Ajitha Rajan, Mats P. E. Heimdahl, Kurt Woodham |
ASE | 5 |