Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kritika Muralidharan
dblp:08/10452
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 39% 3D vision · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
biologically inspired vision |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominance · NIPS 2010 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › low-level vision
feature detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominance · NIPS 2010 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically inspired neural network
v1 model |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominance · NIPS 2010 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominance · NIPS 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
decision theory · 0.1contrast normalization · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominanceabstractThe determination of dominant orientation at a given image location is formulated as a decision-theoretic question. This leads to a novel measure for the dominance of a given orientation $\theta$, which is similar to that used by SIFT. It is then shown that the new measure can be computed with a network that implements the sequence of operations of the standard neurophysiological model of V1. The measure can thus be seen as a biologically plausible version of SIFT, and is denoted as bioSIFT. The network units are shown to exhibit trademark properties of V1 neurons, such as cross-orientation suppression, sparseness and independence. The connection between SIFT and biological vision provides a justification for the success of SIFT-like features and reinforces the importance of contrast normalization in computer vision. We illustrate this by replacing the Gabor units of an HMAX network with the new bioSIFT units. This is shown to lead to significant gains for classification tasks, leading to state-of-the-art performance among biologically inspired network models and performance competitive with the best non-biological object recognition systems. Kritika Muralidharan, Nuno Vasconcelos |
NIPS | 1 |