Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kritika Muralidharan

dblp:08/10452 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Image recognition and object detection · 39% 3D vision · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
biologically inspired vision
0.112010
A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominance · NIPS 2010
Computer vision › 3D vision › low-level vision
feature detection
0.112010
A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominance · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically inspired neural network
v1 model
0.112010
A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominance · NIPS 2010
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.012010
A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominance · NIPS 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

decision theory · 0.1contrast normalization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 A biologically plausible network for the computation of orientation dominance
abstract
The determination of dominant orientation at a given image location is formulated as a decision-theoretic question. This leads to a novel measure for the dominance of a given orientation $\theta$, which is similar to that used by SIFT. It is then shown that the new measure can be computed with a network that implements the sequence of operations of the standard neurophysiological model of V1. The measure can thus be seen as a biologically plausible version of SIFT, and is denoted as bioSIFT. The network units are shown to exhibit trademark properties of V1 neurons, such as cross-orientation suppression, sparseness and independence. The connection between SIFT and biological vision provides a justification for the success of SIFT-like features and reinforces the importance of contrast normalization in computer vision. We illustrate this by replacing the Gabor units of an HMAX network with the new bioSIFT units. This is shown to lead to significant gains for classification tasks, leading to state-of-the-art performance among biologically inspired network models and performance competitive with the best non-biological object recognition systems.
Kritika Muralidharan, Nuno Vasconcelos
NIPS1