Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guntis Kulikovskis

dblp:08/8369 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0002-8438-5678ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 87% Robot manipulation · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bio-inspired robot › bio-inspired locomotion
biomimetic propulsion
0.112010
Myometry-driven compliant-body design for underwater propulsion · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics
0.112010
Myometry-driven compliant-body design for underwater propulsion · ICRA 2010
Robotics › Robot manipulation › mechanical design
compliant mechanism
0.012010
Myometry-driven compliant-body design for underwater propulsion · ICRA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

myometry · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Myometry-driven compliant-body design for underwater propulsion
abstract
Within the broader scope of underwater biomimetics, in this paper we address the relevance of factors such as shape and elasticity distribution in the ability of a compliant device to imitate the kinematic behaviour of a fish. We assess the viability of myometry as a tool to determine candidate mechanical parameters without relying solely on analytical models; we show that we can obtain elasticity distributions that are both consistent with previous theoretical investigations and experimentally better adherent to the passive kinematics of a biological embodiment (rainbow trout).
Otar Akanyeti, Andres Ernits, Maria-Camilla Fiazza, Gert Toming, Guntis Kulikovskis, Madis Listak, Rasmus Raag, Taavi Salumae, Paolo Fiorini, Maarja Kruusmaa
ICRA5