Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Huang Yu

dblp:08/8587 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 93% Distributed systems · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Distributed and cloud data management · 33% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 33% Indexing and storage engines · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed and cloud data management › distributed database architecture
distributed relational database
0.612022
OceanBase: A 707 Million tpmC Distributed Relational Database System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022
Transaction processing and concurrency control
distributed transaction processing
0.612022
OceanBase: A 707 Million tpmC Distributed Relational Database System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022
Indexing and storage engines › storage management
storage engine
0.612022
OceanBase: A 707 Million tpmC Distributed Relational Database System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › logic representation
and-inverter graph
0.612022
DeepGate: learning neural representations of logic gates · DAC 2022
Electronic design automation › machine learning for EDA
circuit representation learning
0.612022
DeepGate: learning neural representations of logic gates · DAC 2022
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.612022
DeepGate: learning neural representations of logic gates · DAC 2022
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.612022
DeepGate: learning neural representations of logic gates · DAC 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.212022
DeepGate: learning neural representations of logic gates · DAC 2022
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.212022
OceanBase: A 707 Million tpmC Distributed Relational Database System · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

shared-nothing architecture · 1.1representation learning · 1.1multi-tenancy · 1.1graph neural network · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 DeepGate: learning neural representations of logic gates
abstract
Applying deep learning (DL) techniques in the electronic design automation (EDA) field has become a trending topic. Most solutions apply well-developed DL models to solve specific EDA problems. While demonstrating promising results, they require careful model tuning for every problem. The fundamental question on "How to obtain a general and effective neural representation of circuits?" has not been answered yet. In this work, we take the first step towards solving this problem. We propose DeepGate, a novel representation learning solution that effectively embeds both logic function and structural information of a circuit as vectors on each gate. Specifically, we propose transforming circuits into unified and-inverter graph format for learning and using signal probabilities as the supervision task in DeepGate. We then introduce a novel graph neural network that uses strong inductive biases in practical circuits as learning priors for signal probability prediction. Our experimental results show the efficacy and generalization capability of DeepGate.
Min Li 0019, Sadaf Khan, Zhengyuan Shi, Naixing Wang, Huang Yu, Qiang Xu 0001
DAC5
2022 OceanBase: A 707 Million tpmC Distributed Relational Database System
abstract
We have designed and developed OceanBase, a distributed relational database system from the very basics for a decade. Being a scale-out multi-tenant system, OceanBase is cross-region fault tolerant, which is based on the shared-nothing architecture. Besides sharing many similar goals with alternative distributed DBMS, such as horizontal scalability, fault-tolerance, etc., our design has been driven by the demands of typical RDBMS compatibility as well as both on-premise and off-premise deployments. OceanBase has fulfilled its design goal. It implements the salient features of certain mainstream classical RDBMS, and most applications on them can run on OceanBase, with or without a few minor modifications. Tens of thousands of OceanBase servers have been deployed in Alipay.com as well as many other commercial organizations. It has also successfully passed the TPC-C benchmark test and seized the first place with more than 707 million tpmC. This paper presents the goals, design criteria, infrastructure, and key components of OceanBase including its engines for storage and transaction processing. Further, it details how OceanBase achieves the above leading TPC-C benchmark in a distributed cluster with more than 1,500 servers from 3 zones. It also describes lessons what we have learnt in building OceanBase for more than a decade.
Chuanhui Yang, Fusheng Han, Mingqiang Zhuang, Zhifeng Yang, Xiaojun Cheng, Yuzhong Zhao, Wenhui Shi, Huafeng Xi, Huang Yu, Yi Pan 0001, Boxue Yin, Junquan Chen, Quanqing Xu
Proc. VLDB Endow.11
2017 Frequency participation by using virtual inertia in wind turbines including energy storage
abstract
With the increase of wind generation penetration, power fluctuations and weak inertia may attempt to the power system frequency stability. In this paper, in order to solve this problem, a hierarchical control strategy is proposed for permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) based wind turbine (WT) and battery unit (BU). A central controller forecasts wind speed and determines system operation states to be sent to the local controllers. These local controllers include MPPT, virtual inertia, and pitch control for the WT; and power control loops for the BU. The proposed approach achieve at the same time both output power smoothing and frequency participation. Simulation results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed control strategy in different scenarios.
Zhaoxia Xiao, Huang Yu, Josep M. Guerrero, Hongwei Fang
IECON2