Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tjerk de Greef
dblp:09/3569
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 50% Interaction techniques and input · 50% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › adaptive robot behavior
adaptive assistance |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Automated Adaptive Support for Task and Information Prioritizing · IJCAI 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Adaptive Automation in a Naval Combat Management SystemabstractThere is a continuing trend of letting fewer people deal with larger amounts of information in more complex situations using highly automated systems. In such circumstances, there is a risk that people are overwhelmed by information during intense periods or, on the other hand, do not build sufficient situational awareness during periods of slack to deal with situations where human intervention becomes necessary. A number of studies show encouraging results in increasing the efficiency of human–machine systems by making the automation adapt itself to the human needs. Current literature shows no examples of adaptive automation in real operational settings, however. We introduce a fine-grained adaptation methodology based on well-established concepts that is easy to comprehend and likely to be accepted by the end user. At the same time, we let the machine operate like a virtual team member in that it continuously builds its own view of the situation independent from the human. Working agreements between human and machine provide lower and upper bounds of automation that are in advance determined by the end user so that unwanted appropriation of responsibility by the machine is avoided. The framework is domain neutral and therefore thought to be applicable across a wide range of complex systems, both military and civilian. It gives researchers an architecture that they can use in their own work to get adaptive automation up and running quickly and easily. Henryk F. R. Arciszewski, Tjerk de Greef, J. H. van Delft |
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A | 2 |
| 2005 | Automated Adaptive Support for Task and Information Prioritizing
Tjerk de Greef, Peter-Paul van Maanen |
IJCAI | 1 |