Automated grading of student responses still faces numerous challenges, particularly when dealing with complex and ambiguous answers. In particular, large models are prone to scoring bias when handling uncertain responses, and few-shot reasoning methods often lack stability, which limits their applicability in real educational scenarios. To tackle these challenges, we propose the Contrastive Error Mining and FineTuning (CEM-FT) framework, which automatically identifies high-value hard samples by analyzing scoring disagreements between a full fine-tuned model and a few-shot model. A lightweight LoRA adapter is then trained on these samples to refine model performance with minimal computational overhead. Experiments on the SciEntsbank, Beetle, and Mohler datasets show that CEM-FT can improve QWK by up to 3.9% compared to the fine-tuned Qwen model on SciEntsbank datasets, which is a significant improvement over the few-shot baseline. The proposed framework substantially enhances both scoring accuracy and consistency, providing a practical, robust solution for reliable automated assessment with large language models.

Virtual Reality (VR) co-manipulation enables multiple users to collaboratively interact with shared virtual objects. However, existing research treats objects as monolithic entities, overlooking scenarios where users need to manipulate different sub-components simultaneously. This work addresses conflict resolution when users select overlapping vertices (non-disjoint sets) during co-manipulation. We present a comprehensive framework comprising preventive strategies (Object-level and Action-level Restrictions) and reactive strategies (computational conflict resolution). Through two user studies with 76 participants (38 pairs), we evaluated these approaches in collaborative wireframe editing tasks. Study 1 identified Averaging as the optimal computational method, balancing task efficiency with user experience. Study 2 highlighted that Action-level Restriction, which permits overlapping selections but restricts concurrent identical operations, achieved better performance compared to exclusive object locking. Reactive strategies using averaging provided smooth collaboration for experienced users, while second-user priority enabled quick corrections. Our findings indicate that optimal strategy selection depends on task requirements, user expertise, and collaboration patterns. Based on the findings, we provide design implications for developing VR collaboration systems that support flexible sub-components manipulation while maintaining collaborative awareness and minimizing conflicts.

Virtual Reality (VR) offers a unique collaborative experience, with parallel views playing a pivotal role in Collaborative Virtual Environments by supporting the transfer and delivery of items. Sharing and manipulating partners' views provides users with a broader perspective that helps them identify the targets and partner actions. We proposed TeamPortal accordingly and conducted two user studies with 72 participants (36 pairs) to investigate the potential benefits of interactive, shared perspectives in VR collaboration. Our first study compared ShaView and TeamPortal against a baseline in a collaborative task that encompassed a series of searching and manipulation tasks. The results show that TeamPortal significantly reduced movement and increased collaborative efficiency and social presence in complex tasks. Following the results, the second study evaluated three variants: TeamPortal+, SnapTeamPortal+, and DropTeamPortal+. The results show that both SnapTeamPortal+ and DropTeamPortal+ improved task efficiency and willingness to further adopt these technologies, though SnapTeamPortal+ reduced co-presence. Based on the findings, we proposed three design implications to inform the development of future VR collaboration systems.