Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Christian Piwetz

dblp:09/5249 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
architectural design		 0.011998
On Detecting and Handling Inconsistencies in Integrating Software Architecture Design and Performance Evaluation · ASE 1998
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture		 0.011998
On Detecting and Handling Inconsistencies in Integrating Software Architecture Design and Performance Evaluation · ASE 1998
Performance modeling and evaluation › software performance engineering
software performance analysis		 0.011998
On Detecting and Handling Inconsistencies in Integrating Software Architecture Design and Performance Evaluation · ASE 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

graph-based approach · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 On Detecting and Handling Inconsistencies in Integrating Software Architecture Design and Performance Evaluation
abstract
We consider the problem of detecting and handling inconsistencies in software development processes using a graph based approach. It seems to be a natural way to express the various options and possibilities in attacking the problem. We apply the techniques developed in the area of software architecture design which uses in a structured way performance models in order to produce a design which incorporates also nonfunctional requirements in terms of quantitative performance.
Michael Goedicke, Torsten Meyer, Christian Piwetz
 ASE3