Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuezhou Lv

dblp:09/8398 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
incentive mechanism
0.422015
Incentive Networks · AAAI 2015
Fair and resilient incentive tree mechanisms · PODC 2013
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division
0.212016
To Give or Not to Give: Fair Division for Single Minded Valuations · IJCAI 2016
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
network economics
0.212015
Incentive Networks · AAAI 2015
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › incentive mechanism design
crowdsourcing incentive mechanisms
0.212013
Fair and resilient incentive tree mechanisms · PODC 2013
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection
0.112010
NetShield: massive semantics-based vulnerability signature matching for high-speed networks · SIGCOMM 2010
Computational social science and digital humanities › social network analysis
network topology
0.112015
Incentive Networks · AAAI 2015
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network analysis
0.112015
Incentive Networks · AAAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

game theory · 0.6altruism modeling · 0.4fair division theory · 0.2semantics-based signature matching · 0.2mechanism design · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Collaboration Without Communication: Evacuating Two Robots from a Disk
Sebastian Brandt 0002, Felix Laufenberg, Yuezhou Lv, David Stolz, Roger Wattenhofer
CIAC3
2016 To Give or Not to Give: Fair Division for Single Minded Valuations
Simina Brânzei, Yuezhou Lv, Ruta Mehta
IJCAI2
2016 Fair and resilient Incentive Tree mechanisms
Yuezhou Lv, Thomas Moscibroda
Distributed Comput.1
2015 Incentive Networks
abstract
In a basic economic system, each participant receives a (financial) reward according to his own contribution to the system. In this work, we study an alternative approach — Incentive Networks — in which a participant's reward depends not only on his own contribution; but also in part on the contributions made by his social contacts or friends. We show that the key parameter effecting the efficiency of such an Incentive Network-based economic system depends on the participant's degree of directed altruism. Directed altruism is the extent to which someone is willing to work if his work results in a payment to his friend, rather than to himself. Specifically, we characterize the condition under which an Incentive Network-based economy is more efficient than the basic "pay-for-your-contribution" economy. We quantify by how much incentive networks can reduce the total reward that needs to be paid to the participants in order to achieve a certain overall contribution. Finally, we study the impact of the network topology and various exogenous parameters on the efficiency of incentive networks. Our results suggest that in many practical settings, Incentive Network-based reward systems or compensation structures could be more efficient than the ubiquitous 'pay-for-your-contribution' schemes.
Yuezhou Lv, Thomas Moscibroda
AAAI1
2015 Local Information in Influence Networks
Yuezhou Lv, Thomas Moscibroda
DISC1
2013 Fair and resilient incentive tree mechanisms
abstract
We study Incentive Tree for motivating the participation of people in crowdsourcing or human tasking systems. In an Incentive Tree, each participant is rewarded for contributing to the system, as well as for soliciting new participants into the system, who then themselves contribute to it and/or themselves solicit new participants. An Incentive Tree mechanism is an algorithm that determines how much reward each individual participant receives based on all the participants' contributions, as well as the structure of the solicitation tree. The sum of rewards paid by the mechanism to all participants is linear in the sum of their total contribution.
Yuezhou Lv, Thomas Moscibroda
PODC1
2010 NetShield: massive semantics-based vulnerability signature matching for high-speed networks
abstract
Accuracy and speed are the two most important metrics for Network Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (NIDS/NIPSes). Due to emerging polymorphic attacks and the fact that in many cases regular expressions (regexes) cannot capture the vulnerability conditions accurately, the accuracy of existing regex-based NIDS/NIPS systems has become a serious problem. In contrast, the recently-proposed vulnerability signatures (a.k.a data patches) can exactly describe the vulnerability conditions and achieve better accuracy. However, how to efficiently apply vulnerability signatures to high speed NIDS/NIPS with a large ruleset remains an untouched but challenging issue.
Zhichun Li, Gao Xia, Yi Tang 0002, Yan Chen 0004, Bin Liu 0001, Junchen Jiang, Yuezhou Lv
SIGCOMM8