Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuezhou Lv
dblp:09/8398
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Network security · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
incentive mechanism |
0.4 | 2 | 2015 | Incentive Networks · AAAI 2015 Fair and resilient incentive tree mechanisms · PODC 2013 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | To Give or Not to Give: Fair Division for Single Minded Valuations · IJCAI 2016 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
network economics |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Incentive Networks · AAAI 2015 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › incentive mechanism design
crowdsourcing incentive mechanisms |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Fair and resilient incentive tree mechanisms · PODC 2013 |
Network security › intrusion detection and prevention
intrusion detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | NetShield: massive semantics-based vulnerability signature matching for high-speed networks · SIGCOMM 2010 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › social network analysis
network topology |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Incentive Networks · AAAI 2015 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Incentive Networks · AAAI 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
game theory · 0.6altruism modeling · 0.4fair division theory · 0.2semantics-based signature matching · 0.2mechanism design · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Collaboration Without Communication: Evacuating Two Robots from a Disk
Sebastian Brandt 0002, Felix Laufenberg, Yuezhou Lv, David Stolz, Roger Wattenhofer |
CIAC | 3 |
| 2016 | To Give or Not to Give: Fair Division for Single Minded Valuations
Simina Brânzei, Yuezhou Lv, Ruta Mehta |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2016 | Fair and resilient Incentive Tree mechanisms
Yuezhou Lv, Thomas Moscibroda |
Distributed Comput. | 1 |
| 2015 | Incentive NetworksabstractIn a basic economic system, each participant receives a (financial) reward according to his own contribution to the system. In this work, we study an alternative approach — Incentive Networks — in which a participant's reward depends not only on his own contribution; but also in part on the contributions made by his social contacts or friends. We show that the key parameter effecting the efficiency of such an Incentive Network-based economic system depends on the participant's degree of directed altruism. Directed altruism is the extent to which someone is willing to work if his work results in a payment to his friend, rather than to himself. Specifically, we characterize the condition under which an Incentive Network-based economy is more efficient than the basic "pay-for-your-contribution" economy. We quantify by how much incentive networks can reduce the total reward that needs to be paid to the participants in order to achieve a certain overall contribution. Finally, we study the impact of the network topology and various exogenous parameters on the efficiency of incentive networks. Our results suggest that in many practical settings, Incentive Network-based reward systems or compensation structures could be more efficient than the ubiquitous 'pay-for-your-contribution' schemes. Yuezhou Lv, Thomas Moscibroda |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2015 | Local Information in Influence Networks
Yuezhou Lv, Thomas Moscibroda |
DISC | 1 |
| 2013 | Fair and resilient incentive tree mechanismsabstractWe study Incentive Tree for motivating the participation of people in crowdsourcing or human tasking systems. In an Incentive Tree, each participant is rewarded for contributing to the system, as well as for soliciting new participants into the system, who then themselves contribute to it and/or themselves solicit new participants. An Incentive Tree mechanism is an algorithm that determines how much reward each individual participant receives based on all the participants' contributions, as well as the structure of the solicitation tree. The sum of rewards paid by the mechanism to all participants is linear in the sum of their total contribution. Yuezhou Lv, Thomas Moscibroda |
PODC | 1 |
| 2010 | NetShield: massive semantics-based vulnerability signature matching for high-speed networksabstractAccuracy and speed are the two most important metrics for Network Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems (NIDS/NIPSes). Due to emerging polymorphic attacks and the fact that in many cases regular expressions (regexes) cannot capture the vulnerability conditions accurately, the accuracy of existing regex-based NIDS/NIPS systems has become a serious problem. In contrast, the recently-proposed vulnerability signatures (a.k.a data patches) can exactly describe the vulnerability conditions and achieve better accuracy. However, how to efficiently apply vulnerability signatures to high speed NIDS/NIPS with a large ruleset remains an untouched but challenging issue. Zhichun Li, Gao Xia, Yi Tang 0002, Yan Chen 0004, Bin Liu 0001, Junchen Jiang, Yuezhou Lv |
SIGCOMM | 8 |