Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arup Mukherjee

dblp:10/2089 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 50% Operating systems · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › non-functional testing
robustness testing
0.011997
Measuring Software Dependability by Robustness Benchmarking · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.011997
Measuring Software Dependability by Robustness Benchmarking · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical benchmark construction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Classroom Exercises for Improving Understanding of Analysis and Design of Decision Support Systems
Arup Mukherjee
J. Comput. Inf. Syst.1
1997 Measuring Software Dependability by Robustness Benchmarking
abstract
Inability to identify weaknesses or to quantify advancements in software system robustness frequently hinders the development of robust software systems. Efforts have been made to develop benchmarks of software robustness to address this problem, but they all suffer from significant shortcomings. The paper presents the various features that are desirable in a benchmark of system robustness, and evaluates some existing benchmarks according to these features. A new hierarchically structured approach to building robustness benchmarks, which overcomes many deficiencies of past efforts, is also presented. This approach has been applied to building a hierarchically structured benchmark that tests part of the Unix file and virtual memory systems. The resultant benchmark has successfully been used to identify new response class structures that were not detected in a similar situation by other less organized techniques.
Arup Mukherjee, Daniel P. Siewiorek
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
1996 Data Broadcasting and Reduction, Prefix Computation, and Sorting on Reduces Hypercube Parallel Computer
Sotirios G. Ziavras, Arup Mukherjee
Parallel Comput.2
1995 Meta-scripts as a mechanism for complex web services
abstract
The World-Wide Web is the 'killer application' of the mid-1990's, and as a result it serves as the market place for various services. This position document discusses the problem of creating complex Web services from simpler ones, under client control. For example, one might want an annotated forecast of a company's stock price from three simple services, viz., stock price data, forecasting and annotation. We propose meta-scripts as a solution. A client accesses a meta-script, which contains procedures for accessing and composing simpler services. Meta-identifiers are used in the meta-script instead of static links. Developments in type-consistency mechanisms and various enabling services of the Web help in realization of the meta-script based approach. This model of service composition separates control from data manipulation, and gives this control to a client. As clients are empowered with the selection and coordination of service providers, this can lead to a free market for services.
Murthy V. Devarakonda, Arup Mukherjee, Bill Kish
HotOS2