Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John Novatnack

dblp:10/2512 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 64% Image and video processing · 36%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 50% Image recognition and object detection · 50%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape analysis
0.112012
3D Geometric Scale Variability in Range Images: Features and Descriptors · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2012
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
scale variation
0.112012
3D Geometric Scale Variability in Range Images: Features and Descriptors · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2012
Image and video processing
image registration
0.112008
Scale-Dependent/Invariant Local 3D Shape Descriptors for Fully Automatic Registration of Multiple Sets of Range Images · ECCV (3) 2008
Geometric modeling and processing › point cloud processing › range image processing
range image registration
0.112008
Scale-Dependent/Invariant Local 3D Shape Descriptors for Fully Automatic Registration of Multiple Sets of Range Images · ECCV (3) 2008
Geometric modeling and processing
shape descriptor
0.112008
Scale-Dependent/Invariant Local 3D Shape Descriptors for Fully Automatic Registration of Multiple Sets of Range Images · ECCV (3) 2008
Image and video processing › multiscale analysis › multiresolution analysis
scale selection
0.112007
Scale-Dependent 3D Geometric Features · ICCV 2007
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis
0.112007
Scale-Dependent 3D Geometric Features · ICCV 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scale-dependent descriptors · 0.1surface normal encoding · 0.1scale-space analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 3D Geometric Scale Variability in Range Images: Features and Descriptors
Prabin Bariya, John Novatnack, Gabriel Schwartz, Ko Nishino
Int. J. Comput. Vis.2
2008 Scale-Dependent/Invariant Local 3D Shape Descriptors for Fully Automatic Registration of Multiple Sets of Range Images
John Novatnack, Ko Nishino
ECCV (3)1
2008 Canonical subsets of image features
Trip Denton, Ali Shokoufandeh, John Novatnack, Ko Nishino
Comput. Vis. Image Underst.3
2008 A generalized family of fixed-radius distribution-based distance measures for content-based fMRI image retrieval
John Novatnack, Nicu D. Cornea, Ali Shokoufandeh, Deborah Silver, Sven J. Dickinson, Paul B. Kantor
Pattern Recognit. Lett.1
2007 Scale-Dependent 3D Geometric Features
abstract
Three-dimensional geometric data play fundamental roles in many computer vision applications. However, their scale-dependent nature, i.e. the relative variation in the spatial extents of local geometric structures, is often overlooked. In this paper we present a comprehensive framework for exploiting this 3D geometric scale variability. Specifically, we focus on detecting scale-dependent geometric features on triangular mesh models of arbitrary topology. The key idea of our approach is to analyze the geometric scale variability of a given 3D model in the scale-space of a dense and regular 2D representation of its surface geometry encoded by the surface normals. We derive novel corner and edge detectors, as well as an automatic scale selection method, that acts upon this representation to detect salient geometric features and determine their intrinsic scales. We evaluate the effectiveness and robustness of our method on a number of models of different topology. The results show that the resulting scale-dependent geometric feature set provides a reliable basis for constructing a rich but concise representation of the geometric structure at hand.
John Novatnack, Ko Nishino
ICCV1
2005 Synchronization effects in mobile ad hoc networks
abstract
This paper illustrates how networking protocols can inadvertently exacerbate obstacles to providing real-time guarantees for distributed problem solving in wireless mobile and sensor networks. We analyze the effects of control packet timing on providing quality of service guarantees. Inappropriate timing of control packets gives rise to synchronizations that result in sharp increases and decreases in throughput with small changes in node speed. Such synchronizations can seriously jeopardize network performance with direct effect on real-time guarantees. This paper introduces these synchronizations, analyzes them and suggests ways to modify the control packet timing to overcome them. These analyses include investigating the role of buffering at the network layer and its impact on network throughput. We analyze these effects and evaluate our protocol enhancements through simulation studies.
Harpreet Arora, Lloyd G. Greenwald, Harish Sethu, John Novatnack
WiMob (3)4
2005 Evaluating ad hoc routing protocols with respect to quality of service
abstract
The ability of a mobile ad hoc network (MANET) to provide adequate quality of service (QoS) is limited by the ability of the underlying routing protocol to provide consistent behavior despite the inherent dynamics of a mobile computing environment. In this paper we study three MANET routing protocols: OLSR, DSR and AODV, with an emphasis on the effect they have on various QoS metrics. We describe and analyze how the protocols differ in the mechanisms they use to select paths, detect broken links, and buffer messages during periods of link outage. The effects of these differences are quantified in terms of packet delivery ratio, end-to-end hop count, end-to-end latency, and mechanism overhead. We show that the proactive protocol, OLSR, builds paths with consistently lower hop counts than the reactive protocols, AODV and DSR, a fact that leads to a reduction in end-to-end latency that assists a QoS model in meeting timing requirements and improves global network performance. We further show the impact of broken link detection latency on the packet delivery ratio. A routing protocol that can not quickly recover from link breakage caused by mobility renders a QoS model incapable of meeting delivery requirements. Finally, we analyze the effect of mobility on the distribution of end-to-end latencies. Traditionally, reactive protocols are criticized for buffering during the building of routes, however we also study buffering phenomenon caused by the proactive mechanisms of OLSR.
John Novatnack, Lloyd G. Greenwald, Harpreet Arora
WiMob (3)1