Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hagen Völzer
dblp:10/3990
· DBLP profile ↗
46ranked-venue papers
12as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3547-3847ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 22 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Theory of computation · 13 · 6 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 10 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Logic in computer science · 55% Automated reasoning and model checking · 32% Distributed computing theory · 6% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Services computing and microservices · 78% Software maintenance and evolution · 22% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-View Incident Ticket Clustering for Optimal Ticket Dispatching · KDD 2015 |
Services computing and microservices › service management
IT service management |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Multi-View Incident Ticket Clustering for Optimal Ticket Dispatching · KDD 2015 |
Logic in computer science
temporal logic |
0.2 | 2 | 2012 | Defining Fairness in Reactive and Concurrent Systems · J. ACM 2012 Temporal Logics and Model Checking for Fairly Correct Systems · LICS 2006 |
Logic in computer science › temporal logic
linear-time properties |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Defining Fairness in Reactive and Concurrent Systems · J. ACM 2012 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
reactive system verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Defining Fairness in Reactive and Concurrent Systems · J. ACM 2012 |
Logic in computer science › temporal logic › branching-time temporal logic
CTL |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Temporal Logics and Model Checking for Fairly Correct Systems · LICS 2006 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Temporal Logics and Model Checking for Fairly Correct Systems · LICS 2006 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software configuration management |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | SubCM: A Tool for Improved Visibility of Software Change in an Industrial Setting · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004 |
Distributed computing theory
randomization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | On Randomization Versus Synchronization in Distributed Systems · ICALP 2004 |
Information theory
measure theory |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Defining Fairness in Reactive and Concurrent Systems · J. ACM 2012 |
Logic in computer science
topological characterization |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Defining Fairness in Reactive and Concurrent Systems · J. ACM 2012 |
Software maintenance and evolution
build management |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | SubCM: A Tool for Improved Visibility of Software Change in an Industrial Setting · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2004 |
Coding theory › constrained coding
synchronization |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | On Randomization Versus Synchronization in Distributed Systems · ICALP 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
topological characterization · 0.1measure-theoretic analysis · 0.1game-theoretic characterization · 0.1topological largeness · 0.1probabilistic largeness · 0.1file-based configuration management · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Evaluation of an Architecture for an LLM-Based Analytics System for Exploratory Process Mining
Timothy Sulzer, Hagen Völzer, Barbara Weber |
CAiSE (2) | 2 |
| 2024 | A Benchmark for Rule Induction in Automated Business Decisions
Hagen Völzer, Daniel Horn, Yusik Kim, Greger Ottosson |
RuleML+RR | 1 |
| 2023 | Supporting Provenance and Data Awareness in Exploratory Process Mining
Francesca Zerbato, Andrea Burattin, Hagen Völzer, Paul Nelson Becker, Elia Boscaini, Barbara Weber |
CAiSE | 3 |
| 2023 | A Fresh Approach to Analyze Process OutcomesabstractWe propose a set of techniques to analyze final or intermediate process outcomes. The main novelties are (i) outcome flow diagrams - a visualization of a process as a sequence of global decisions and their contribution to the process outcomes, and (ii) an interactive method to find explanations for process outcomes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our techniques in the context of an in-depth study on the Road Traffic Fine Management event log, for which we obtain so far undocumented insights. Hagen Völzer, Francesca Zerbato, Timothy Sulzer, Barbara Weber |
ICPM | 1 |
| 2021 | Graph Autoencoders for Business Process Anomaly Detection
Siyu Huo, Hagen Völzer, Prabhat Reddy, Prerna Agarwal, Vatche Isahagian, Vinod Muthusamy |
BPM | 2 |
| 2019 | Managing Security Objects and -Processes Using an Extended BPM Approach and -SystemabstractOne important use case for (business) process technology is process compliance. We propose that managing security objects such as cryptographic keys is an application domain that can greatly benefit from using process technology because of a critical compliance requirement. To this end, we present a BPMN extension and a design of a support system for key management processes. Both were driven by a case study on a distributed application using a standard hierarchical public key infrastructure, which we also present. Our prototypical implementation of the support system shows that process compliance for security object management processes can be substantially supported with moderate effort by extending the standard process technology. Jochen Malte Küster, Niklaus Meyer, Hagen Völzer, Maria Dubovitskaya, Michael Osborne, Axel Tanner |
EDOC | 3 |
| 2018 | Computing the Concurrency Threshold of Sound Free-Choice Workflow Nets
Klara J. Meyer, Javier Esparza, Hagen Völzer |
TACAS (2) | 3 |
| 2018 | Dynamic skipping and blocking, dead path elimination for cyclic workflows, and a local semantics for inclusive gateways
Dirk Fahland, Hagen Völzer |
Inf. Syst. | 2 |
| 2016 | The Complexity of Deadline Analysis for Workflow Graphs with Multiple Resources
Mirela Botezatu, Hagen Völzer, Lothar Thiele |
BPM | 2 |
| 2016 | Dynamic Skipping and Blocking and Dead Path Elimination for Cyclic Workflows
Dirk Fahland, Hagen Völzer |
BPM | 2 |
| 2016 | Diagnostic Information for Control-Flow Analysis of Workflow Graphs (a.k.a. Free-Choice Workflow Nets)
Cédric Favre, Hagen Völzer, Peter Müller 0001 |
TACAS | 2 |
| 2016 | Preface to BPM 2014
Mathias Weske, Shazia Sadiq, Pnina Soffer, Hagen Völzer |
Inf. Syst. | 4 |
| 2016 | Supporting different process views through a Shared Process Model
Jochen Malte Küster, Hagen Völzer, Cédric Favre, Moisés Castelo Branco, Krzysztof Czarnecki 0001 |
Softw. Syst. Model. | 2 |
| 2015 | The Complexity of Deadline Analysis for Workflow Graphs with a Single ResourceabstractWorkflow graphs (WFGs) are control-flow graphs extended by parallel fork and join. They are used to represent the main control-flow of e.g. business process models modeled in languages such as BPMN or UML activity diagrams. A WFG is said to be sound if it is free of deadlocks and exhibits no lack of synchronization. We study the question whether the executions of a time-annotated sound WFG meet a given deadline. We present polynomial-time algorithms and NP-hardness results for different cases. In particular, we show that it can be decided in polynomial time whether some executions of a sound WFG meet the deadline. Furthermore we show that for general probabilistic WFGs, it is NP-hard to determine whether the probability of an execution meeting the deadline is higher than a given threshold, whereas the expected duration of an execution can be computed in polynomial time. Mirela Botezatu, Hagen Völzer, Lothar Thiele |
ICECCS | 2 |
| 2015 | A Software Architecture for Transportation Planning and Monitoring in a Collaborative Network
Anne Baumgraß, Remco M. Dijkman, Paul Grefen, Shaya Pourmirza, Hagen Völzer, Mathias Weske |
PRO-VE | 5 |
| 2015 | Multi-View Incident Ticket Clustering for Optimal Ticket DispatchingabstractWe present a novel technique that optimizes the dispatching of incident tickets to the agents in an IT Service Support Environment. Unlike the common skill-based dispatching, our approach also takes empirical evidence on the agent's speed from historical data into account. Our solution consists of two parts. First, a novel technique clusters historic tickets into incident categories that are discriminative in terms of agent's performance. Second, a dispatching policy selects, for an incoming ticket, the fastest available agent according to the target cluster. We show that, for ticket data collected from several Service Delivery Units, our new dispatching technique can reduce service time between $35\%$ and $44\%$. Mirela Botezatu, Jasmina Bogojeska, Ioana Giurgiu, Hagen Völzer, Dorothea Wiesmann |
KDD | 4 |
| 2015 | The relationship between workflow graphs and free-choice workflow nets
Cédric Favre, Dirk Fahland, Hagen Völzer |
Inf. Syst. | 3 |
| 2014 | A case study on consistency management of business and IT process models in banking
Moisés Castelo Branco, Yingfei Xiong 0001, Krzysztof Czarnecki 0001, Jochen Malte Küster, Hagen Völzer |
Softw. Syst. Model. | 5 |
| 2013 | Supporting Different Process Views through a Shared Process Model
Jochen Malte Küster, Hagen Völzer, Cédric Favre, Moisés Castelo Branco, Krzysztof Czarnecki 0001 |
ECMFA | 2 |
| 2012 | The Difficulty of Replacing an Inclusive OR-Join
Cédric Favre, Hagen Völzer |
BPM | 2 |
| 2012 | Matching Business Process Workflows across Abstraction Levels
Moisés Castelo Branco, Javier Troya, Krzysztof Czarnecki 0001, Jochen Malte Küster, Hagen Völzer |
MoDELS | 5 |
| 2012 | Defining Fairness in Reactive and Concurrent SystemsabstractWe define when a linear-time temporal property is a fairness property with respect to a given system. This captures the essence shared by most fairness assumptions that are used in the specification and verification of reactive and concurrent systems, such as weak fairness, strong fairness, k -fairness, and many others. We provide three characterizations of fairness: a language-theoretic, a game-theoretic, and a topological characterization. It turns out that the fairness properties are the sets that are “large” from a topological point of view, that is, they are the co-meager sets in the natural topology of runs of a given system. This insight provides a link to probability theory where a set is “large” when it has measure 1. While these two notions of largeness are similar, they do not coincide in general. However, we show that they coincide for ω -regular properties and bounded Borel measures. That is, an ω -regular temporal property of a finite-state system has measure 1 under a bounded Borel measure if and only if it is a fairness property with respect to that system. The definition of fairness leads to a generic relaxation of correctness of a system in linear-time semantics. We define a system to be fairly correct if there exists a fairness assumption under which it satisfies its specification. Equivalently, a system is fairly correct if the set of runs satisfying the specification is topologically large. We motivate this notion of correctness and show how it can be verified in a system. Hagen Völzer, Daniele Varacca |
J. ACM | 1 |
| 2011 | Analysis on demand: Instantaneous soundness checking of industrial business process models
Dirk Fahland, Cédric Favre, Jana Koehler, Niels Lohmann, Hagen Völzer, Karsten Wolf |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 5 |
| 2011 | Identifying refactoring opportunities in process model repositories
Remco M. Dijkman, Beat Gfeller, Jochen Malte Küster, Hagen Völzer |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 4 |
| 2010 | Symbolic Execution of Acyclic Workflow Graphs
Cédric Favre, Hagen Völzer |
BPM | 2 |
| 2010 | A New Semantics for the Inclusive Converging Gateway in Safe Processes
Hagen Völzer |
BPM | 1 |
| 2009 | Instantaneous Soundness Checking of Industrial Business Process Models
Dirk Fahland, Cédric Favre, Barbara Jobstmann, Jana Koehler, Niels Lohmann, Hagen Völzer, Karsten Wolf |
BPM | 6 |
| 2009 | Counterexamples in Probabilistic LTL Model Checking for Markov Chains
Matthias Schmalz, Daniele Varacca, Hagen Völzer |
CONCUR | 3 |
| 2009 | The refined process structure tree
Jussi Vanhatalo, Hagen Völzer, Jana Koehler |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 2 |
| 2008 | The Refined Process Structure Tree
Jussi Vanhatalo, Hagen Völzer, Jana Koehler |
BPM | 2 |
| 2008 | Automatic Workflow Graph Refactoring and Completion
Jussi Vanhatalo, Hagen Völzer, Frank Leymann, Simon Moser |
ICSOC | 2 |
| 2007 | Model Checking Almost All Paths Can Be Less Expensive Than Checking All Paths
Matthias Schmalz, Hagen Völzer, Daniele Varacca |
FSTTCS | 2 |
| 2007 | Faster and More Focused Control-Flow Analysis for Business Process Models Through SESE Decomposition
Jussi Vanhatalo, Hagen Völzer, Frank Leymann |
ICSOC | 2 |
| 2006 | Temporal Logics and Model Checking for Fairly Correct SystemsabstractWe motivate and study a generic relaxation of correctness of reactive and concurrent systems with respect to a temporal specification. We define a system to be fairly correct if there exists a fairness assumption under which it satisfies its specification. Equivalently, a system is fairly correct if the set of runs satisfying the specification is large from a topological point of view, i.e., it is a co-meager set. We compare topological largeness with its more popular sibling, probabilistic largeness, where a specification is probabilistically large if the set of runs satisfying the specification has probability 1. We show that topological and probabilistic largeness of omega-regular specifications coincide for bounded Borel measures on finite-state systems. As a corollary, we show that, for specifications expressed in LTL or by Buchi automata, checking that a finite-state system is fairly correct has the same complexity as checking that it is correct. Finally we study variants of the logics CTL and CTL*, where the 'for all runs' quantifier is replaced by a 'for a large set of runs' quantifier. We show that the model checking complexity for these variants is the same as for the original logics Daniele Varacca, Hagen Völzer |
LICS | 2 |
| 2006 | Probabilistic event structures and domains
Daniele Varacca, Hagen Völzer, Glynn Winskel |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2005 | Defining Fairness
Hagen Völzer, Daniele Varacca, Ekkart Kindler |
CONCUR | 1 |
| 2005 | On Conspiracies and Hyperfairness in Distributed Computing
Hagen Völzer |
DISC | 1 |
| 2004 | Probabilistic Event Structures and Domains
Daniele Varacca, Hagen Völzer, Glynn Winskel |
CONCUR | 2 |
| 2004 | On Randomization Versus Synchronization in Distributed Systems
Hagen Völzer |
ICALP | 1 |
| 2004 | A constructive proof for FLP
Hagen Völzer |
Inf. Process. Lett. | 1 |
| 2004 | SubCM: A Tool for Improved Visibility of Software Change in an Industrial SettingabstractSoftware configuration management is the discipline of managing large collections of software development artefacts from which software products are built. Software configuration management tools typically deal with artefacts at fine levels of granularity - such as individual source code files - and assist with coordination of changes to such artefacts. This paper describes a lightweight tool, designed to be used on top of a traditional file-based configuration management system. The add-on tool support enables users to flexibly define new hierarchical views of product structure, independent of the underlying artefact-repository structure. The tool extracts configuration and change data with respect to the user-defined hierarchy, leading to improved visibility of how individual subsystems have changed. The approach yields a range of new capabilities for build managers, and verification and validation teams. The paper includes a description of our experience using the tool in an organization that builds large embedded software systems. Hagen Völzer, Anthony MacDonald, Brenton Atchison, Andrew Hanlon, Peter A. Lindsay, Paul A. Strooper |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |
| 2002 | Refinement-Robust Fairness
Hagen Völzer |
CONCUR | 1 |
| 2002 | A Tool for Subsystem Configuration ManagementabstractThis paper describes a tool that manages a hierarchical, "is a subsystem of"-structure on a set of software development artefacts and that provides configuration management (CM) for subsystems by interacting with an existing CM tool. The tool is based on a recently proposed framework for subsystem-based configuration management. The tool demonstrates the feasibility of the framework and develops it further The design of the framework and the tool was developed in collaboration with Invensys SCADA Development and it is discussed in relation to their current software development process. Hagen Völzer, Brenton Atchison, Paul A. Strooper, Peter A. Lindsay, Anthony MacDonald |
ICSM | 1 |
| 2001 | Randomized Non-sequential Processes
Hagen Völzer |
CONCUR | 1 |
| 2001 | Algebraic nets with flexible arcs
Ekkart Kindler, Hagen Völzer |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 1997 | Petri Net Based Verification of Distributed Algorithms: An ExampleabstractAbstract A technique to model and to verify distributed algorithms is suggested. This technique (based on Petri nets) reduces the modelling and analysis effort to a reasonable level. The paper outlines the technique using the example of a typical network algorithm, the echo algorithm . Ekkart Kindler, Wolfgang Reisig, Hagen Völzer, Rolf Walter |
Formal Aspects Comput. | 3 |