Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick Wischnewski

dblp:10/4886 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 67% Program verification · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
automated verification
0.212013
Automated verification of interactive rule-based configuration systems · ASE 2013
Requirements engineering and software design
software product lines
0.212013
Automated verification of interactive rule-based configuration systems · ASE 2013
Requirements engineering and software design › software product lines
variability modeling
0.212013
Automated verification of interactive rule-based configuration systems · ASE 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rule-based specification · 0.2model checking · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Compliance, Functional Safety and Fault Detection by Formal Methods
Christof Fetzer, Christoph Weidenbach, Patrick Wischnewski
ISoLA (2)3
2013 Automated verification of interactive rule-based configuration systems
abstract
Rule-based specifications of systems have again become common in the context of product line variability modeling and configuration systems. In this paper, we define a logical foundation for rule-based specifications that has enough expressivity and operational behavior to be practically useful and at the same time enables decidability of important overall properties such as consistency or cycle-freeness. Our logic supports rule-based interactive user transitions as well as the definition of a domain theory via rule transitions. As a running example, we model DOPLER, a rule-based configuration system currently in use at Siemens.
Deepak Dhungana, Ching Hoo Tang, Christoph Weidenbach, Patrick Wischnewski
ASE4
2009 SPASS Version 3.5
Christoph Weidenbach, Dilyana Dimova, Arnaud Fietzke, Martin Suda 0001, Patrick Wischnewski
CADE6