Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Iman I. Yusuf

dblp:10/7251 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-3517-6535ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 67% Cloud and datacenter computing · 23% High-performance computing · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.322015
Chiminey: Reliable Computing and Data Management Platform in the Cloud · ICSE (2) 2015
Evaluating recovery aware components for grid reliability · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2009
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud applications
cloud-based scientific computing
0.212015
Chiminey: Reliable Computing and Data Management Platform in the Cloud · ICSE (2) 2015
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
failure handling
0.212015
Chiminey: Reliable Computing and Data Management Platform in the Cloud · ICSE (2) 2015
Distributed systems
grid computing
0.112009
Evaluating recovery aware components for grid reliability · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2009
Data integration and cleaning
data curation
0.112015
Chiminey: Reliable Computing and Data Management Platform in the Cloud · ICSE (2) 2015
High-performance computing
scientific computing systems
0.112015
Chiminey: Reliable Computing and Data Management Platform in the Cloud · ICSE (2) 2015
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
reliability modeling
0.012009
Evaluating recovery aware components for grid reliability · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reactive restarting · 0.1proactive rejuvenation · 0.1prediction modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Managing Usability and Reliability Aspects in Cloud Computing
abstract
Cloud computing provides a great opportunity for scientists, as it enables large-scale experiments that cannot are too long to run on local desktop machines. Cloud-based computations can be highly parallel, long running and data-intensive, which is desirable for many kinds of scientific experiments. However, to unlock this power, we need a user-friendly interface and an easy-to-use methodology for conducting these experiments. For this reason, we introduce here a formal model of a cloud-based platform and the corresponding opensource implementation. The proposed solution allows to conduct experiments without having a deep technical understanding of cloud-computing, HPC, fault tolerance, or data management in order to leverage the benefits of cloud computing. In the current version, we have focused on biophysics and structural chemistry experiments, based on the analysis of big data from synchrotrons and atomic force microscopy. The domain experts noted the time savings for co mputing and data management, as well as user-friendly interface.
Maria Spichkova, Heinz W. Schmidt, Ian E. Thomas, Iman I. Yusuf, Steve G. Androulakis, Grischa R. Meyer
ENASE4
2015 Scalable and Fault-Tolerant Cloud Computations: Modelling and Implementation
abstract
This paper presents a formal model for science clouds, capable of predicting and controlling resources scalably, as well as its implementation as an open source solution, called Chiminey. The feasibility of Chiminey is shown using case studies on biophysics and structural chemistry computations. Big data is acquired from scientific instruments such as synchrotrons and atomic force microscopes. The model takes into account the architecture of the overall parallel and distributed system including large-scale data sources; data sinks, for example petabyte research data stores; and cluster or cloud virtual resources and infrastructures characterised by users in simple parameters upfront. Chiminey is developed to control large numbers of processes and to provide a reliable computing and data management, which can be used by researchers without having to learn extensive infrastructure concepts and technologies.
Maria Spichkova, Ian E. Thomas, Heinz W. Schmidt, Iman I. Yusuf, Daniel W. Drumm, Steve G. Androulakis, George Opletal, Salvy P. Russo
ICPADS4
2015 Chiminey: Reliable Computing and Data Management Platform in the Cloud
abstract
The enabling of scientific experiments that are embarrassingly parallel, long running and data-intensive into a cloud-based execution environment is a desirable, though complex undertaking for many researchers. The management of such virtual environments is cumbersome and not necessarily within the core skill set for scientists and engineers. We present here Chiminey, a software platform that enables researchers to (i) run applications on both traditional high-performance computing and cloud-based computing infrastructures, (ii) handle failure during execution, (iii) curate and visualise execution outputs, (iv) share such data with collaborators or the public, and (v) search for publicly available data.
Iman I. Yusuf, Ian E. Thomas, Maria Spichkova, Steve G. Androulakis, Grischa R. Meyer, Daniel W. Drumm, George Opletal, Salvy P. Russo, Ashley M. Buckle, Heinz W. Schmidt
ICSE (2)1
2009 Evaluating recovery aware components for grid reliability
abstract
Failure in grids is costly and inevitable. Existing fault tolerance (FT) mechanisms are typically defensive and reactive, thus unnecessarily costly. In this paper we propose a hybrid FT approach, recovery aware component (RAC), combining reactive and proactive FT, with failure recovery or aversion of user-defined granularity, by component-orientation and architecture-level reasoning about FT, to increase reliability and availability without needless performance sacrifices. We model and analyse a parameterised RAC implementation combining prediction, proactive rejuvenation and reactive restarting to varying extents, calculating cost savings, reliability improvements and cost-benefit, under parameters such as prediction frequency and accuracy.
Iman I. Yusuf, Heinz W. Schmidt, Ian Peake
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE1