Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anh N. Le

dblp:10/8356 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Optical networks · 50% Routing and switching · 50%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 77% Approximation and online algorithms · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › switching networks
nonblocking networks
0.112010
Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality) · INFOCOM 2010
Optical networks
switching network design
0.112010
Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality) · INFOCOM 2010
Mathematical optimization
linear programming
0.112010
Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality) · INFOCOM 2010
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.012010
Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality) · INFOCOM 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear programming duality · 0.2competitive analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality)
abstract
The main task in analyzing a switching network design (including circuit-, multirate-, and photonic-switching) is to determine the minimum number of some switching components so that the design is non-blocking in some sense (e.g., stridor wide-sense). We show that, in many cases, this task can be accomplished with a simple two-step strategy: (1) formulate a linear program whose optimum value is a bound for the minimum number we are seeking, and (2) specify a solution to the dual program, whose objective value by weak duality immediately yields a sufficient condition for the design to be non-blocking. We illustrate this technique through a variety of examples, ranging from circuit to multirate to photonic switching, from unicast to f-cast and multicast, and from strict- to wide-sense non-blocking. The switching architectures in the examples are of Clos-type and Banyan-type, which are the two most popular architectural choices for designing non-blocking switching networks. To prove the result in the multirate Clos network case, we formulate a new problem called DYNAMIC WEIGHTED EDGE COLORING which generalizes the DYNAMIC BIN PACKING problem. We then design an algorithm with competitive ratio 5.6355 for the problem. The algorithm is analyzed using the linear programming technique. We also show that no algorithm can have competitive ratio better than 4-O (log n/n) for this problem. New lower- and upper-bounds for multirate wide-sense non-blocking Clos networks follow, improving upon a couple of 10-year-old bounds on the same problem.
Hung Q. Ngo 0001, Atri Rudra, Anh N. Le
INFOCOM3