Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anh N. Le
dblp:10/8356
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Optical networks · 50% Routing and switching · 50% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 77% Approximation and online algorithms · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching › switching networks
nonblocking networks |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality) · INFOCOM 2010 |
Optical networks
switching network design |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality) · INFOCOM 2010 |
Mathematical optimization
linear programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality) · INFOCOM 2010 |
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality) · INFOCOM 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear programming duality · 0.2competitive analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Analyzing Nonblocking Switching Networks using Linear Programming (Duality)abstractThe main task in analyzing a switching network design (including circuit-, multirate-, and photonic-switching) is to determine the minimum number of some switching components so that the design is non-blocking in some sense (e.g., stridor wide-sense). We show that, in many cases, this task can be accomplished with a simple two-step strategy: (1) formulate a linear program whose optimum value is a bound for the minimum number we are seeking, and (2) specify a solution to the dual program, whose objective value by weak duality immediately yields a sufficient condition for the design to be non-blocking. We illustrate this technique through a variety of examples, ranging from circuit to multirate to photonic switching, from unicast to f-cast and multicast, and from strict- to wide-sense non-blocking. The switching architectures in the examples are of Clos-type and Banyan-type, which are the two most popular architectural choices for designing non-blocking switching networks. To prove the result in the multirate Clos network case, we formulate a new problem called DYNAMIC WEIGHTED EDGE COLORING which generalizes the DYNAMIC BIN PACKING problem. We then design an algorithm with competitive ratio 5.6355 for the problem. The algorithm is analyzed using the linear programming technique. We also show that no algorithm can have competitive ratio better than 4-O (log n/n) for this problem. New lower- and upper-bounds for multirate wide-sense non-blocking Clos networks follow, improving upon a couple of 10-year-old bounds on the same problem. Hung Q. Ngo 0001, Atri Rudra, Anh N. Le |
INFOCOM | 3 |