We describe and evaluate two new, independently-applicable power reduction techniques for power management on processors that support dynamic voltage and frequency scaling (DVFS): user-driven frequency scaling (UDFS) and process-driven voltage scaling (PDVS). In PDVS, a CPU-customized profile is derived offline that encodes the minimum voltage needed to achieve stability at each combination of CPU frequency and temperature. On a typical processor, PDVS reduces the voltage below the worst-case minimum operating voltages given in datasheets. UDFS, on the other hand, dynamically adapts CPU frequency to the individual user and the workload through direct user feedback. Our UDFS algorithms dramatically reduce typical operating frequencies and voltages while maintaining performance at a satisfactory level for each user. We evaluate our techniques independently and together through user studies conducted on a Pentium M laptop running Windows applications. We measure the overall system power and temperature reduction achieved by our methods. Combining PDVS and the best UDFS scheme reduces measured system power by 49.9% (27.8% PDVS, 22.1% UDFS), averaged across all our users and applications, compared to Windows XP DVFS. The average temperature of the CPU is decreased by 13.2degC. User trace-driven simulation to evaluate the CPU only indicates average CPU dynamic power savings of 57.3% (32.4% PDVS, 24.9% UDFS), with a maximum reduction of 83.4%. In a multitasking environment, the same UDFS+PDVS technique reduces the CPU dynamic power by 75.7% on average.

Dynamic Voltage and Frequency Scaling (DVFS) is one of the most commonly used power reduction techniques in high-performance processors. DVFS varies the frequency and voltage of a microprocessor in real-time according to processing needs. Although there are different versions of DVFS, at its core DVFS adapts power consumption and performance to the current workload of the CPU. Specifically, existing DVFS techniques in high-performance processors select an operating point (CPU frequency and voltage) based on the utilization of the processor. This approach integrates OS-level control, but such control is pessimistic. Existing DVFS techniques are pessimistic about the user. Indeed, they ignore the user, assuming that CPU utilization or the OS events prompting it are sufficient proxies. A high CPU utilization simply leads to a high frequency and high voltage, regardless of the user’s satisfaction or expectation of performance. Existing DVFS techniques are pessimistic about the CPU. They assume worst-case manufacturing process variation and operating temperature by basing their policies on loose worstcase bounds given by the processor manufacturer. A voltage level for a given frequency is set such that even the worst shipped processor of a given generation will be stable at the highest specified temperature. In response to these observations, we have developed, implemented, and evaluated the following two new power management techniques that can be readily employed independently or together. We elaborate on these techniques in detail elsewhere [4].

We are developing Virtuoso, u system ,for distributed computing using virtual machines (VMs). Virtuoso must be uble to mix batch und interactive VMs on the same physical hardwure, while satisfiing constraint on re- sponsiveness und compute rates for each workload. VSched is the component of Virtuoso that provides this capability. VSched is an entirely user-level tool that interacts with the stock Linux kernel running below any type-11 virtual machine monitor to schedule VMs (indeed, any process) using a periodic real-time scheduling model. This abstraction allows compute rate and responsivness constraints to be straightforwardly described using a period und a slice within the period, and it allows,for just and simple admission control. This paper makes the case,for periodic real-time scheduling for VM-based computing environments, and then describes and evaluate.s VSched. It also applies VSched to scheduling parallel worklouds, showing that it can help a BSP application maintain a fixed stable performance despite externally caused loud imbalance.