Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Liling Tan
dblp:115/5317
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-7601-903XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Machine translation · 85% Language models and text generation · 8% Deep learning architectures and training · 8% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › computer-assisted translation
automatic post-editing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Can Automatic Post-Editing Improve NMT? · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
constrained machine translation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Lexically Constrained Neural Machine Translation with Levenshtein Transformer · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › constrained machine translation
lexically constrained translation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Lexically Constrained Neural Machine Translation with Levenshtein Transformer · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
non-autoregressive generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Lexically Constrained Neural Machine Translation with Levenshtein Transformer · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Lexically Constrained Neural Machine Translation with Levenshtein Transformer · ACL 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural post-editing model · 0.4levenshtein transformer · 0.4beam search · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Lexically Constrained Neural Machine Translation with Levenshtein TransformerabstractThis paper proposes a simple and effective algorithm for incorporating lexical constraints in neural machine translation.Previous work either required re-training existing models with the lexical constraints or incorporating them during beam search decoding with significantly higher computational overheads.Leveraging the flexibility and speed of a recently proposed Levenshtein Transformer model (Gu et al., 2019), our method injects terminology constraints at inference time without any impact on decoding speed.Our method does not require any modification to the training procedure and can be easily applied at runtime with custom dictionaries.Experiments on English-German WMT datasets show that our approach improves an unconstrained baseline and previous approaches. Raymond Hendy Susanto, Shamil Chollampatt, Liling Tan |
ACL | 3 |
| 2020 | Can Automatic Post-Editing Improve NMT?abstractAutomatic post-editing (APE) aims to improve machine translations, thereby reducing human post-editing effort.APE has had notable success when used with statistical machine translation (SMT) systems but has not been as successful over neural machine translation (NMT) systems.This has raised questions on the relevance of APE task in the current scenario.However, the training of APE models has been heavily reliant on large-scale artificial corpora combined with only limited human post-edited data.We hypothesize that APE models have been underperforming in improving NMT translations due to the lack of adequate supervision.To ascertain our hypothesis, we compile a larger corpus of human post-edits of English to German NMT.We empirically show that a state-of-art neural APE model trained on this corpus can significantly improve a strong in-domain NMT system, challenging the current understanding in the field.We further investigate the effects of varying training data sizes, using artificial training data, and domain specificity for the APE task. Shamil Chollampatt, Raymond Hendy Susanto, Liling Tan, Ewa Szymanska |
EMNLP (1) | 3 |
| 2016 | BIRA: Improved Predictive Exchange Word ClusteringabstractWord clusters are useful for many NLP tasks including training neural network language models, but current increases in datasets are outpacing the ability of word clusterers to handle them.Little attention has been paid thus far on inducing high-quality word clusters at a large scale.The predictive exchange algorithm is quite scalable, but sometimes does not provide as good perplexity as other slower clustering algorithms.We introduce the bidirectional, interpolated, refining, and alternating (BIRA) predictive exchange algorithm.It improves upon the predictive exchange algorithm's perplexity by up to 18%, giving it perplexities comparable to the slower two-sided exchange algorithm, and better perplexities than the slower Brown clustering algorithm.Our BIRA implementation is fast, clustering a 2.5 billion token English News Crawl corpus in 3 hours.It also reduces machine translation training time while preserving translation quality.Our implementation is portable and freely available. Jon Dehdari, Liling Tan, Josef van Genabith |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2014 | Grammatical Error Detection with Limited Training Data: The Case of Chinese
Marcos Zampieri, Liling Tan |
ICCE | 2 |
| 2011 | Building and Annotating the Linguistically Diverse NTU-MC (NTU-Multilingual Corpus)
Liling Tan, Francis Bond |
PACLIC | 1 |