Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Youngchul Cha

dblp:117/4356 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 55% Information retrieval · 34% Web and social media mining · 8%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › text mining › topic modeling
social network topic modeling
0.322013
Incorporating popularity in topic models for social network analysis · SIGIR 2013
Social-network analysis using topic models · SIGIR 2012
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling
0.322013
Incorporating popularity in topic models for social network analysis · SIGIR 2013
Social-network analysis using topic models · SIGIR 2012
Information retrieval
online advertising
0.212014
Exploration of the effect of Category Match Score in search advertising · ICDE 2014
Information retrieval › online advertising
sponsored search
0.212014
Exploration of the effect of Category Match Score in search advertising · ICDE 2014
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.122013
Incorporating popularity in topic models for social network analysis · SIGIR 2013
Social-network analysis using topic models · SIGIR 2012
Recommender systems › social recommendation
friend recommendation
0.012012
Social-network analysis using topic models · SIGIR 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic topic model · 0.3revenue prediction · 0.2click-through rate prediction · 0.2latent dirichlet allocation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Exploration of the effect of Category Match Score in search advertising
abstract
Categorical (topic) similarity between a web page and an advertisement (ad) text has long been used for contextual advertising. In this paper, we explore the use of the categorical similarity score, referred to as Category Match Score (CMS), in the context of search advertising. In particular, we explore the effect of CMS on various ad-effectiveness prediction tasks, including user-judgment prediction, ad click-through-rate prediction (CTR), and revenue-per-impression prediction. Our extensive experiments on two editorial datasets and one live traffic dataset demonstrate that CMS is one of the strongest features in the judgment prediction task and that CMS-based filtering is very effective in improving revenue per impression as well as CTR. We believe that our analyses can be extremely effective in helping web service providers serve more relevant and profitable ads to users.
Youngchul Cha, Junghoo Cho, Tak W. Yan
ICDE1
2013 Incorporating popularity in topic models for social network analysis
abstract
Topic models are used to group words in a text dataset into a set of relevant topics. Unfortunately, when a few words frequently appear in a dataset, the topic groups identified by topic models become noisy because these frequent words repeatedly appear in "irrelevant" topic groups. This noise has not been a serious problem in a text dataset because the frequent words (e.g., the and is) do not have much meaning and have been simply removed before a topic model analysis. However, in a social network dataset we are interested in, they correspond to popular persons (e.g., Barack Obama and Justin Bieber) and cannot be simply removed because most people are interested in them.
Youngchul Cha, Bin Bi, Chu-Cheng Hsieh, Junghoo Cho
SIGIR1
2012 Social-network analysis using topic models
abstract
In this paper, we discuss how we can extend probabilistic topic models to analyze the relationship graph of popular social-network data, so that we can group or label the edges and nodes in the graph based on their topic similarity. In particular, we first apply the well-known Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model and its existing variants to the graph-labeling task and argue that the existing models do not handle popular nodes (nodes with many incoming edges) in the graph very well. We then propose possible extensions to this model to deal with popular nodes. Our experiments show that the proposed extensions are very effective in labeling popular nodes, showing significant improvements over the existing methods. Our proposed methods can be used for providing, for instance, more relevant friend recommendations within a social network.
Youngchul Cha, Junghoo Cho
SIGIR1