Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amar Parkash

dblp:117/4992 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 45% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Vision and language · 15%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
attribute-based recognition
0.322012
Attributes for Classifier Feedback · ECCV (3) 2012
Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.222014
Predicting User Annoyance Using Visual Attributes · CVPR 2014
Attributes for Classifier Feedback · ECCV (3) 2012
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning
0.112012
Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › attribute recognition
relative attribute learning
0.112012
Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning
0.112012
Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012
Information retrieval
image retrieval
0.112014
Predicting User Annoyance Using Visual Attributes · CVPR 2014
Information retrieval › image retrieval › user-centric image retrieval
interactive image retrieval
0.012012
Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transfer learning · 0.6attribute-based representation · 0.6ranking function learning · 0.3classifier feedback · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Predicting User Annoyance Using Visual Attributes
abstract
Computer Vision algorithms make mistakes. In human-centric applications, some mistakes are more annoying to users than others. In order to design algorithms that minimize the annoyance to users, we need access to an annoyance or cost matrix that holds the annoyance of each type of mistake. Such matrices are not readily available, especially for a wide gamut of human-centric applications where annoyance is tied closely to human perception. To avoid having to conduct extensive user studies to gather the annoyance matrix for all possible mistakes, we propose predicting the annoyance of previously unseen mistakes by learning from example mistakes and their corresponding annoyance. We promote the use of attribute-based representations to transfer this knowledge of annoyance. Our experimental results with faces and scenes demonstrate that our approach can predict annoyance more accurately than baselines. We show that as a result, our approach makes less annoying mistakes in a real-world image retrieval application.
Gordon A. Christie, Amar Parkash, Ujwal Krothapalli, Devi Parikh
CVPR2
2012 Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication
abstract
We propose to model relative attributes that capture the relationships between images and objects in terms of human-nameable visual properties. For example, the models can capture that animal A is 'furrier' than animal B, or image X is 'brighter' than image B. Given training data stating how object/scene categories relate according to different attributes, we learn a ranking function per attribute. The learned ranking functions predict the relative strength of each property in novel images. We show how these relative attribute predictions enable a variety of novel applications, including zero-shot learning from relative comparisons, automatic image description, image search with interactive feedback, and active learning of discriminative classifiers. We overview results demonstrating these applications with images of faces and natural scenes. Overall, we find that relative attributes enhance the precision of communication between humans and computer vision algorithms, providing the richer language needed to fluidly "teach" a system about visual concepts.
Devi Parikh, Adriana Kovashka, Amar Parkash, Kristen Grauman
AAAI3
2012 Attributes for Classifier Feedback
Amar Parkash, Devi Parikh
ECCV (3)1