Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amar Parkash
dblp:117/4992
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 45% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Vision and language · 15% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
attribute-based recognition |
0.3 | 2 | 2012 | Attributes for Classifier Feedback · ECCV (3) 2012 Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.2 | 2 | 2014 | Predicting User Annoyance Using Visual Attributes · CVPR 2014 Attributes for Classifier Feedback · ECCV (3) 2012 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › attribute recognition
relative attribute learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012 |
Information retrieval
image retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | Predicting User Annoyance Using Visual Attributes · CVPR 2014 |
Information retrieval › image retrieval › user-centric image retrieval
interactive image retrieval |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine Communication · AAAI 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 0.6attribute-based representation · 0.6ranking function learning · 0.3classifier feedback · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Predicting User Annoyance Using Visual AttributesabstractComputer Vision algorithms make mistakes. In human-centric applications, some mistakes are more annoying to users than others. In order to design algorithms that minimize the annoyance to users, we need access to an annoyance or cost matrix that holds the annoyance of each type of mistake. Such matrices are not readily available, especially for a wide gamut of human-centric applications where annoyance is tied closely to human perception. To avoid having to conduct extensive user studies to gather the annoyance matrix for all possible mistakes, we propose predicting the annoyance of previously unseen mistakes by learning from example mistakes and their corresponding annoyance. We promote the use of attribute-based representations to transfer this knowledge of annoyance. Our experimental results with faces and scenes demonstrate that our approach can predict annoyance more accurately than baselines. We show that as a result, our approach makes less annoying mistakes in a real-world image retrieval application. Gordon A. Christie, Amar Parkash, Ujwal Krothapalli, Devi Parikh |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2012 | Relative Attributes for Enhanced Human-Machine CommunicationabstractWe propose to model relative attributes that capture the relationships between images and objects in terms of human-nameable visual properties. For example, the models can capture that animal A is 'furrier' than animal B, or image X is 'brighter' than image B. Given training data stating how object/scene categories relate according to different attributes, we learn a ranking function per attribute. The learned ranking functions predict the relative strength of each property in novel images. We show how these relative attribute predictions enable a variety of novel applications, including zero-shot learning from relative comparisons, automatic image description, image search with interactive feedback, and active learning of discriminative classifiers. We overview results demonstrating these applications with images of faces and natural scenes. Overall, we find that relative attributes enhance the precision of communication between humans and computer vision algorithms, providing the richer language needed to fluidly "teach" a system about visual concepts. Devi Parikh, Adriana Kovashka, Amar Parkash, Kristen Grauman |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2012 | Attributes for Classifier Feedback
Amar Parkash, Devi Parikh |
ECCV (3) | 1 |