Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fisher Yu 0002
dblp:117/6314-2
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › blockchain network security
long range attack |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bitcoin-Enhanced Proof-of-Stake Security: Possibilities and Impossibilities · SP 2023 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › consensus protocol
proof-of-stake |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Bitcoin-Enhanced Proof-of-Stake Security: Possibilities and Impossibilities · SP 2023 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › electronic cash
bitcoin |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Bitcoin-Enhanced Proof-of-Stake Security: Possibilities and Impossibilities · SP 2023 |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security › consensus protocol
proof-of-work |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Bitcoin-Enhanced Proof-of-Stake Security: Possibilities and Impossibilities · SP 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
protocol design · 0.7impossibility result · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Bitcoin-Enhanced Proof-of-Stake Security: Possibilities and ImpossibilitiesabstractBitcoin is the most secure blockchain in the world, supported by the immense hash power of its Proof-of-Work miners. Proof-of-Stake chains are energy-efficient, have fast finality but face several security issues: susceptibility to non-slashable long-range safety attacks, low liveness resilience and difficulty to bootstrap from low token valuation. We show that these security issues are inherent in any PoS chain without an external trusted source, and propose a new protocol, Babylon, where an off-the-shelf PoS protocol checkpoints onto Bitcoin to resolve these issues. An impossibility result justifies the optimality of Babylon. A use case of Babylon is to reduce the stake withdrawal delay: our experimental results show that this delay can be reduced from weeks in existing PoS chains to less than 5 hours using Babylon, at a transaction cost of less than 10K USD per annum for posting the checkpoints onto Bitcoin. Ertem Nusret Tas, David Tse, Fangyu Gai, Sreeram Kannan, Mohammad Ali Maddah-Ali, Fisher Yu 0002 |
SP | 6 |