Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bill Pang

dblp:117/6322 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 56% Image and video processing · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › feature detection
salient point detection
0.112012
Schelling points on 3D surface meshes · ACM Trans. Graph. 2012
Geometric modeling and processing
shape analysis
0.112012
Schelling points on 3D surface meshes · ACM Trans. Graph. 2012
Geometric modeling and processing › mesh processing › mesh analysis
surface mesh analysis
0.012012
Schelling points on 3D surface meshes · ACM Trans. Graph. 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regression analysis · 0.1coordination game experiment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Schelling points on 3D surface meshes
abstract
This paper investigates "Schelling points" on 3D meshes, feature points selected by people in a pure coordination game due to their salience. To collect data for this investigation, we designed an online experiment that asked people to select points on 3D surfaces that they expect will be selected by other people. We then analyzed properties of the selected points, finding that: 1) Schelling point sets are usually highly symmetric, and 2) local curvature properties (e.g., Gauss curvature) are most helpful for identifying obvious Schelling points (tips of protrusions), but 3) global properties (e.g., segment centeredness, proximity to a symmetry axis, etc.) are required to explain more subtle features. Based on these observations, we use regression analysis to combine multiple properties into an analytical model that predicts where Schelling points are likely to be on new meshes. We find that this model benefits from a variety of surface properties, particularly when training data comes from examples in the same object class.
Xiaobai Chen, Abulhair Saparov, Bill Pang, Thomas A. Funkhouser
ACM Trans. Graph.3