Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Edward Steinfeld

dblp:118/2324 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 87% Design research and methods · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology
inclusive design
0.112012
Universal Design for Quality of Life Technologies · Proc. IEEE 2012
Accessibility and assistive technology
quality of life technology
0.112012
Universal Design for Quality of Life Technologies · Proc. IEEE 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

universal design strategy · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Universal Design for Quality of Life Technologies
abstract
Engineers and other designers commonly use specifications to frame a project's objectives and constraints. These are supplemented by standards, codes, and regulations to create the design package. However, typical design practices often inadvertently ignore the usefulness of the product, environment or information system by people for whom the product would benefit. Consequently, an early design does not work and requires additional iterations and phases of redesign. This drives up the design costs, delays the process, or by tradeoff, prevents individuals with various types of abilities and disabilities to use the design. The universal design approach offers an efficient cost-effective method to expand the population of potential consumers of a product design. Quality of life technologies demand designs that consider populations that are often missed. This paper defines the need for and characteristics of good universal design with illustrations of successful universal product design as well as erred designs that neglected significant populations of potential product users. By definition, quality of life technologies are inclusive, such as aging populations who function with impairments in vision, hearing, and motor abilities. Executing universal design strategies create more successful outcomes.
Edward Steinfeld, Roger O. Smith
Proc. IEEE1