Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arnold M. Michelson

dblp:118/6867 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Coding theory · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
convolutional codes
0.021995
Viterbi decoding of the (63, 57) Hamming code-implementation and performance results · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1995
The performance of a severely punctured convolutional code, some high rate distance-two block codes, and a Hamming code with maximum likelihood decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1994
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.021995
Viterbi decoding of the (63, 57) Hamming code-implementation and performance results · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1995
The performance of a severely punctured convolutional code, some high rate distance-two block codes, and a Hamming code with maximum likelihood decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1994
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
hamming codes
0.021995
Viterbi decoding of the (63, 57) Hamming code-implementation and performance results · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1995
The performance of a severely punctured convolutional code, some high rate distance-two block codes, and a Hamming code with maximum likelihood decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1994
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
product codes
0.011996
A two-dimensional product code with robust soft-decision decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1996
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
soft-decision decoding
0.011996
A two-dimensional product code with robust soft-decision decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1996
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › trellis decoding
viterbi algorithm
0.011996
A two-dimensional product code with robust soft-decision decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1996
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › convolutional codes › convolutional code decoding
viterbi decoding
0.011995
Viterbi decoding of the (63, 57) Hamming code-implementation and performance results · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1995
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › decoding algorithms › optimal decoding
maximum-likelihood decoding
0.011994
The performance of a severely punctured convolutional code, some high rate distance-two block codes, and a Hamming code with maximum likelihood decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1994
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › convolutional codes
punctured convolutional codes
0.011994
The performance of a severely punctured convolutional code, some high rate distance-two block codes, and a Hamming code with maximum likelihood decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1994
Physical-layer communications › channel modeling › impulsive noise
impulsive noise channels
0.011996
A two-dimensional product code with robust soft-decision decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1996
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › error probability analysis
bit-error probability
0.011995
Viterbi decoding of the (63, 57) Hamming code-implementation and performance results · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1995
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
error detection
0.011982
On the Probability of Undetected Error for Linear Block Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear block codes
0.011982
On the Probability of Undetected Error for Linear Block Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › error detection
undetected error probability
0.011982
On the Probability of Undetected Error for Linear Block Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
weight distribution
0.011982
On the Probability of Undetected Error for Linear Block Codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maximum-likelihood decoding · 0.0dual code formulation · 0.0bounds · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 A two-dimensional product code with robust soft-decision decoding
abstract
The performance of a relatively simple two-dimensional (2-D) product code is considered. The row code is a short constraint length convolutional code, and the column code is a high-rate block code. Both the rows and columns are decoded with soft-decision maximum likelihood decoding. The soft output Viterbi algorithm (SOVA) is used to decode the rows. In one case, the same decoder may be used for the rows and the columns. It is shown that, depending on the rate of the row code, reliable signaling is achieved within about 1.0 to 1.5 dB of the R/sub 0/ limit. Results are given for a particular impulsive noise channel; it is seen that performance is robust over a wide range of channel conditions.
David F. Freeman, Arnold M. Michelson
IEEE Trans. Commun.2
1995 Viterbi decoding of the (63, 57) Hamming code-implementation and performance results
abstract
Use of the Viterbi decoder to decode the (63, 57) Hamming code is considered, Implementation and performance of systematic and nonsystematic codes are addressed. It is shown that a Viterbi decoder for the constraint length seven, rate- 1/2 convolutional code can be used to decode both systematic and nonsystematic (63, 57) Hamming codes, but an additional step is needed to complete the decoding of the systematic code. Bounds and simulation results for postdecoding bit-error probability are given and it is shown that the systematic code performs 0.4 dB better than the nonsystematic code. A heuristic explanation is provided.
Arnold M. Michelson, David F. Freeman
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1994 The performance of a severely punctured convolutional code, some high rate distance-two block codes, and a Hamming code with maximum likelihood decoding
abstract
A severely punctured version of the well known rate-1/2, constraint length 7 convolutional code is considered for transmission of short to moderate length messages. Transmissions are assumed to be truncated by use of tail bits. By severely punctured the authors mean that the only redundancy conveyed is contained in the tail. It is shown that the resulting codes are high rate distance-2 codes and for certain message lengths they are cyclic. The figure of merit assumed is the probability of not correctly decoding a message, and, with maximum likelihood decoding, significant coding gains are demonstrated. In one case, a Hamming code results and its performance is determined. The coding gains observed range from 3.8 dB for the Hamming code to 2.4 dB for the longest distance-2 code considered, a (5040, 5034) code.>
Arnold M. Michelson, George Rosen
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1982 On the Probability of Undetected Error for Linear Block Codes
abstract
The problem of computing the probability of undetected error is considered for linear block codes used for error detection. The recent literature is first reviewed and several results are extended. It is pointed out that an exact calculation can be based on either the weight distribution of a code or its dual. Using the dual code formulation, the probability of undetected error for the ensemble of all nonbinary linear block codes is derived as well as a theorem that shows why the probability of undetected error may not be a monotonic function of channel error rate for some poor codes. Several bounds on the undetected error probability are then presented. We conclude with detailed examples of binary and nonbinary codes for which exact results can be obtained. An efficient technique for measuring an unknown weight distribution is suggested and exact results are compared with experimental results.
Jack K. Wolf, Arnold M. Michelson, Allen H. Levesque
IEEE Trans. Commun.2