Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hilton Bristow
dblp:119/1406
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 70% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 7% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › dense feature matching
dense semantic correspondence |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Dense Semantic Correspondence Where Every Pixel is a Classifier · ICCV 2015 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › correspondence estimation
semantic correspondence |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Dense Semantic Correspondence Where Every Pixel is a Classifier · ICCV 2015 |
Image and video processing › sparse representation
convolutional sparse coding |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Fast Convolutional Sparse Coding · CVPR 2013 |
Image and video processing
sparse representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Fast Convolutional Sparse Coding · CVPR 2013 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation › image representation
image descriptor |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | V1-Inspired Features Induce a Weighted Margin in SVMs · ECCV (2) 2012 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | V1-Inspired Features Induce a Weighted Margin in SVMs · ECCV (2) 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear discriminant analysis · 0.2graphical model · 0.2exemplar classifier · 0.2augmented lagrange method · 0.2support vector machine · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Dense Semantic Correspondence Where Every Pixel is a ClassifierabstractDetermining dense semantic correspondences across objects and scenes is a difficult problem that underpins many higher-level computer vision algorithms. Unlike canonical dense correspondence problems which consider images that are spatially or temporally adjacent, semantic correspondence is characterized by images that share similar high-level structures whose exact appearance and geometry may differ. Motivated by object recognition literature and recent work on rapidly estimating linear classifiers, we treat semantic correspondence as a constrained detection problem, where an exemplar LDA classifier is learned for each pixel. LDA classifiers have two distinct benefits: (i) they exhibit higher average precision than similarity metrics typically used in correspondence problems, and (ii) unlike exemplar SVM, can output globally interpretable posterior probabilities without calibration, whilst also being significantly faster to train. We pose the correspondence problem as a graphical model, where the unary potentials are computed via convolution with the set of exemplar classifiers, and the joint potentials enforce smoothly varying correspondence assignment. Hilton Bristow, Jack Valmadre, Simon Lucey |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2013 | Fast Convolutional Sparse CodingabstractSparse coding has become an increasingly popular method in learning and vision for a variety of classification, reconstruction and coding tasks. The canonical approach intrinsically assumes independence between observations during learning. For many natural signals however, sparse coding is applied to sub-elements ( i.e. patches) of the signal, where such an assumption is invalid. Convolutional sparse coding explicitly models local interactions through the convolution operator, however the resulting optimization problem is considerably more complex than traditional sparse coding. In this paper, we draw upon ideas from signal processing and Augmented Lagrange Methods (ALMs) to produce a fast algorithm with globally optimal sub problems and super-linear convergence. Hilton Bristow, Anders P. Eriksson, Simon Lucey |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2012 | V1-Inspired Features Induce a Weighted Margin in SVMs
Hilton Bristow, Simon Lucey |
ECCV (2) | 1 |