Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hilton Bristow

dblp:119/1406 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 70% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 7%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching › dense feature matching
dense semantic correspondence
0.212015
Dense Semantic Correspondence Where Every Pixel is a Classifier · ICCV 2015
Computer vision › 3D vision › correspondence estimation
semantic correspondence
0.212015
Dense Semantic Correspondence Where Every Pixel is a Classifier · ICCV 2015
Image and video processing › sparse representation
convolutional sparse coding
0.212013
Fast Convolutional Sparse Coding · CVPR 2013
Image and video processing
sparse representation
0.212013
Fast Convolutional Sparse Coding · CVPR 2013
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › visual representation › image representation
image descriptor
0.112012
V1-Inspired Features Induce a Weighted Margin in SVMs · ECCV (2) 2012
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine
0.012012
V1-Inspired Features Induce a Weighted Margin in SVMs · ECCV (2) 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear discriminant analysis · 0.2graphical model · 0.2exemplar classifier · 0.2augmented lagrange method · 0.2support vector machine · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Dense Semantic Correspondence Where Every Pixel is a Classifier
abstract
Determining dense semantic correspondences across objects and scenes is a difficult problem that underpins many higher-level computer vision algorithms. Unlike canonical dense correspondence problems which consider images that are spatially or temporally adjacent, semantic correspondence is characterized by images that share similar high-level structures whose exact appearance and geometry may differ. Motivated by object recognition literature and recent work on rapidly estimating linear classifiers, we treat semantic correspondence as a constrained detection problem, where an exemplar LDA classifier is learned for each pixel. LDA classifiers have two distinct benefits: (i) they exhibit higher average precision than similarity metrics typically used in correspondence problems, and (ii) unlike exemplar SVM, can output globally interpretable posterior probabilities without calibration, whilst also being significantly faster to train. We pose the correspondence problem as a graphical model, where the unary potentials are computed via convolution with the set of exemplar classifiers, and the joint potentials enforce smoothly varying correspondence assignment.
Hilton Bristow, Jack Valmadre, Simon Lucey
ICCV1
2013 Fast Convolutional Sparse Coding
abstract
Sparse coding has become an increasingly popular method in learning and vision for a variety of classification, reconstruction and coding tasks. The canonical approach intrinsically assumes independence between observations during learning. For many natural signals however, sparse coding is applied to sub-elements ( i.e. patches) of the signal, where such an assumption is invalid. Convolutional sparse coding explicitly models local interactions through the convolution operator, however the resulting optimization problem is considerably more complex than traditional sparse coding. In this paper, we draw upon ideas from signal processing and Augmented Lagrange Methods (ALMs) to produce a fast algorithm with globally optimal sub problems and super-linear convergence.
Hilton Bristow, Anders P. Eriksson, Simon Lucey
CVPR1
2012 V1-Inspired Features Induce a Weighted Margin in SVMs
Hilton Bristow, Simon Lucey
ECCV (2)1