Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Minghao Liu 0003

dblp:119/3234-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Language models and text generation · 51% Reinforcement learning · 17% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 15%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Audio and music processing · 54% Computational photography and imaging · 23% Image and video processing · 23%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
1.012026
CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
audio-language model
0.912025
MMAR: A Challenging Benchmark for Deep Reasoning in Speech, Audio, Music, and Their Mix · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.912025
KOR-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models on Knowledge-Orthogonal Reasoning Tasks · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
reasoning benchmark
0.912025
KOR-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models on Knowledge-Orthogonal Reasoning Tasks · ICLR 2025
Computational photography and imaging › image acquisition › imaging system design
camera design
0.412019
Build your own hybrid thermal/EO camera for autonomous vehicle · ICRA 2019
Image and video processing
image registration
0.412019
Build your own hybrid thermal/EO camera for autonomous vehicle · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Autonomous driving
autonomous driving perception
0.112019
Build your own hybrid thermal/EO camera for autonomous vehicle · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

chain-of-thought · 1.7large language model · 1.0critic-guided reinforcement learning · 1.0stepwise prompting · 0.9self-correction · 0.9mechanical alignment · 0.8homography warping · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 CriticLean: Critic-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Mathematical Formalization
abstract
Zhongyuan Peng, Yifan Yao, Kaijing Ma, Shuyue Guo, Yizhe Li, Yichi Zhang, Chenchen Zhang, Yifan Zhang, Zhouliang Yu, Luming Li, Minghao Liu, Yihang Xia, Jiawei Shen, Yuchen Wu, Yixin Cao, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Wenhao Huang, Jiaheng Liu, Ge Zhang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Zhongyuan Peng, Kaijing Ma, Shuyue Guo, Yichi Zhang 0010, Zhouliang Yu, Luming Li, Minghao Liu 0003, Yihang Xia, Yixin Cao 0002, Zhaoxiang Zhang 0001, Wenhao Huang 0001, Ge Zhang 0009
ACL (1)11
2025 KOR-Bench: Benchmarking Language Models on Knowledge-Orthogonal Reasoning Tasks
abstract
In this paper, we introduce Knowledge-Orthogonal Reasoning (KOR), a concept aimed at minimizing reliance on domain-specific knowledge, enabling more accurate evaluation of models' reasoning abilities in out-of-distribution settings. Based on this concept, we propose the Knowledge-Orthogonal Reasoning Benchmark (KOR-Bench), encompassing five task categories: Operation, Logic, Cipher, Puzzle, and Counterfactual. KOR-Bench emphasizes models' effectiveness in applying new rule descriptions to solve novel rule-driven questions. O1-Preview and O1-Mini achieve accuracies of 72.88\% and 70.16\%, surpassing Claude-3.5-Sonnet and GPT-4o (58.96\% and 58.00\%), highlighting the effectiveness of KOR-Bench. We perform detailed analyses, identifying bottlenecks in the Cipher task with Stepwise Prompting, where two rounds of Self-Correction yield optimal results. We evaluate performance across three integrated tasks, explore the impact of Tricks on the Puzzle task, and visualize rule-focused attention. Additionally, we conduct an ablation study on dataset size, benchmark correlations, and zero-shot and three-shot "only questions" experiments. KOR-Bench aims to enhance reasoning evaluation and support further research in this area.
Kaijing Ma, Xeron Du, Yunran Wang, Haoran Zhang 0013, Zhoufutu Wen, Xingwei Qu, Jian Yang 0037, Minghao Liu 0003, Xiang Yue, Wenhao Huang 0001, Ge Zhang 0009
ICLR9
2025 MMAR: A Challenging Benchmark for Deep Reasoning in Speech, Audio, Music, and Their Mix
abstract
We introduce MMAR, a new benchmark designed to evaluate the deep reasoning capabilities of Audio-Language Models (ALMs) across massive multi-disciplinary tasks. MMAR comprises 1,000 meticulously curated audio-question-answer triplets, collected from real-world internet videos and refined through iterative error corrections and quality checks to ensure high quality. Unlike existing benchmarks that are limited to specific domains of sound, music, or speech, MMAR extends them to a broad spectrum of real-world audio scenarios, including mixed-modality combinations of sound, music, and speech. Each question in MMAR is hierarchically categorized across four reasoning layers: Signal, Perception, Semantic, and Cultural, with additional sub-categories within each layer to reflect task diversity and complexity. To further foster research in this area, we annotate every question with a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) rationale to promote future advancements in audio reasoning. Each item in the benchmark demands multi-step deep reasoning beyond surface-level understanding. Moreover, a part of the questions requires graduate-level perceptual and domain-specific knowledge, elevating the benchmark's difficulty and depth. We evaluate MMAR using a broad set of models, including Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs), Large Audio Reasoning Models (LARMs), Omni Language Models (OLMs), Large Language Models (LLMs), and Large Reasoning Models (LRMs), with audio caption inputs. The performance of these models on MMAR highlights the benchmark's challenging nature, and our analysis further reveals critical limitations of understanding and reasoning capabilities among current models. These findings underscore the urgent need for greater research attention in audio-language reasoning, including both data and algorithm innovation. We hope MMAR will serve as a catalyst for future advances in this important but little-explored area.
Ziyang Ma 0001, Yinghao Ma, Yanqiao Zhu 0003, Yi-Wen Chao, Yuanzhe Chen, Zhuo Chen 0006, Jian Cong, Keliang Li, Siyou Li, Xinfeng Li, Xiquan Li, Zheng Lian 0004, Yuzhe Liang, Minghao Liu 0003, Zhikang Niu, Tianrui Wang, Yuping Wang 0005, Yuxuan Wang 0002, Guanrou Yang, Jianwei Yu 0001, Ruibin Yuan, Zhisheng Zheng, Ziya Zhou, Haina Zhu, Wei Xue 0002, Emmanouil Benetos, Kai Yu 0004, Chng Eng Siong, Xie Chen 0001
NeurIPS18
2019 Build your own hybrid thermal/EO camera for autonomous vehicle
abstract
In this work, we propose a novel paradigm to design a hybrid thermal/EO (Electro-Optical or visible-light) camera, whose thermal and RGB frames are pixel-wisely aligned and temporally synchronized. Compared with the existing schemes, we innovate in three ways in order to make it more compact in dimension, and thus more practical and extendable for real-world applications. The first is a redesign of the structure layout of the thermal and EO cameras. The second is on obtaining a pixel-wise spatial registration of the thermal and RGB frames by a coarse mechanical adjustment and a fine alignment through a constant homography warping. The third innovation is on extending one single hybrid camera to a hybrid camera array, through which we can obtain wide-view spatially aligned thermal, RGB and disparity images simultaneously. The experimental results show that the average error of spatial-alignment of two image modalities can be less than one pixel.
Yigong Zhang, Shuo Gu, Yubin Guo, Minghao Liu 0003, Zezhou Sun, Zhixing Hou, Ying Wang 0007, Jian Yang 0003, Jean Ponce, Hui Kong 0001
ICRA5