Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Boris Dadachev
dblp:119/7889
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
masked language modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
non-autoregressive generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
parallel decoding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text segmentation
discourse segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Text Segmentation by Cross Segment Attention · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Text Segmentation by Cross Segment Attention · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
transformer-based segmentation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Text Segmentation by Cross Segment Attention · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical Guidelines · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
t5 · 0.8masking · 0.8markov chain · 0.8transformer · 0.4cross-segment attention · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Promises and Pitfalls of Generative Masked Language Modeling: Theoretical Framework and Practical GuidelinesabstractAutoregressive language models are the currently dominant paradigm for text generation, however they have some fundamental limitations that cannot be remedied by scale—for example inherently sequential and unidirectional generation. While alternate classes of models have been explored, we have limited mathematical understanding of their fundamental power and limitations. In this paper we focus on Generative Masked Language Models (GMLMs), a non-autoregressive paradigm in which we train a model to fit conditional probabilities of the data distribution via masking, which are subsequently used as inputs to a Markov Chain to draw samples from the model. These models empirically strike a promising speed-quality trade-off as each step can be typically parallelized by decoding the entire sequence in parallel. We develop a mathematical framework for analyzing and improving such models which sheds light on questions of sample complexity and inference speed and quality. Empirically, we adapt the T5 model for iteratively-refined parallel decoding, achieving 2-3x speedup in machine translation with minimal sacrifice in quality compared with autoregressive models. We run careful ablation experiments to give recommendations on key design choices, and make fine-grained observations on the common error modes in connection with our theory. Our mathematical analyses and empirical observations characterize both potentials and limitations of this approach, and can be applied to future works on improving understanding and performance of GMLMs. We released codes for our experiments. Alexandre Kirchmeyer, Aashay Mehta, Yilong Qin, Boris Dadachev, Kishore Papineni, Sanjiv Kumar, Andrej Risteski |
ICML | 5 |
| 2020 | Text Segmentation by Cross Segment AttentionabstractDocument and discourse segmentation are two fundamental NLP tasks pertaining to breaking up text into constituents, which are commonly used to help downstream tasks such as information retrieval or text summarization.In this work, we propose three transformer-based architectures and provide comprehensive comparisons with previously proposed approaches on three standard datasets.We establish a new state-of-the-art, reducing in particular the error rates by a large margin in all cases.We further analyze model sizes and find that we can build models with many fewer parameters while keeping good performance, thus facilitating real-world applications.Early life and marriage: Franklin Delano Roosevelt was born on January 30, 1882, in the Hudson Valley town of Hyde Park, New York, to businessman James Roosevelt I and his second wife, Sara Ann Delano.(...) Aides began to refer to her at the time as "the president's girlfriend", and gossip linking the two romantically appeared in the newspapers.(...) Legacy: Roosevelt is widely considered to be one of the most important figures in the history of the United States, as well as one of the most influential figures of the 20th century.(...) Roosevelt has also appeared on several U.S. Postage stamps. Michal Lukasik, Boris Dadachev, Kishore Papineni, Gonçalo Simões |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2014 | On automatic text segmentationabstractAutomatic text segmentation, which is the task of breaking a text into topically-consistent segments, is a fundamental problem in Natural Language Processing, Document Classification and Information Retrieval. Text segmentation can significantly improve the performance of various text mining algorithms, by splitting heterogeneous documents into homogeneous fragments and thus facilitating subsequent processing. Applications range from screening of radio communication transcripts to document summarization, from automatic document classification to information visualization, from automatic filtering to security policy enforcement - all rely on, or can largely benefit from, automatic document segmentation. In this article, a novel approach for automatic text and data stream segmentation is presented and studied. The proposed automatic segmentation algorithm takes advantage of feature extraction and unusual behaviour detection algorithms developed in [4, 5]. It is entirely unsupervised and flexible to allow segmentation at different scales, such as short paragraphs and large sections. We also briefly review the most popular and important algorithms for automatic text segmentation and present detailed comparisons of our approach with several of those state-of-the-art algorithms. Boris Dadachev, Alexander Balinsky, Helen Balinsky |
ACM Symposium on Document Engineering | 1 |