Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zihua Hu
dblp:12/1417
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
0000-0002-2126-6241ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | REDfly: a Regulatory Element Database for Drosophila · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression pattern analysis
gene expression pattern annotation |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | REDfly: a Regulatory Element Database for Drosophila · Bioinform. 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene regulation |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | REDfly: a Regulatory Element Database for Drosophila · Bioinform. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
literature curation · 0.1database construction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | REDfly: a Regulatory Element Database for DrosophilaabstractBioinformatics studies of transcriptional regulation in the metazoa are significantly hindered by the absence of readily available data on large numbers of transcriptional cis-regulatory modules (CRMs). Even the richly annotated Drosophila melanogaster genome lacks extensive CRM information. We therefore present here a database of Drosophila CRMs curated from the literature complete with both DNA sequence and a searchable description of the gene expression pattern regulated by each CRM. This resource should greatly facilitate the development of computational approaches to CRM discovery as well as bioinformatics analyses of regulatory sequence properties and evolution. Steven M. Gallo, Zihua Hu, Marc S. Halfon |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2006 | Utilization of two sample t-test statistics from redundant probe sets to evaluate different probe set algorithms in GeneChip studiesabstractBACKGROUND: The choice of probe set algorithms for expression summary in a GeneChip study has a great impact on subsequent gene expression data analysis. Spiked-in cRNAs with known concentration are often used to assess the relative performance of probe set algorithms. Given the fact that the spiked-in cRNAs do not represent endogenously expressed genes in experiments, it becomes increasingly important to have methods to study whether a particular probe set algorithm is more appropriate for a specific dataset, without using such external reference data. RESULTS: We propose the use of the probe set redundancy feature for evaluating the performance of probe set algorithms, and have presented three approaches for analyzing data variance and result bias using two sample t-test statistics from redundant probe sets. These approaches are as follows: 1) analyzing redundant probe set variance based on t-statistic rank order, 2) computing correlation of t-statistics between redundant probe sets, and 3) analyzing the co-occurrence of replicate redundant probe sets representing differentially expressed genes. We applied these approaches to expression summary data generated from three datasets utilizing individual probe set algorithms of MAS5.0, dChip, or RMA. We also utilized combinations of options from the three probe set algorithms. We found that results from the three approaches were similar within each individual expression summary dataset, and were also in good agreement with previously reported findings by others. We also demonstrate the validity of our findings by independent experimental methods. CONCLUSION: All three proposed approaches allowed us to assess the performance of probe set algorithms using the probe set redundancy feature. The analyses of redundant probe set variance based on t-statistic rank order and correlation of t-statistics between redundant probe sets provide useful tools for data variance analysis, and the co-occurrence of replicate redundant probe sets representing differentially expressed genes allows estimation of result bias. The results also suggest that individual probe set algorithms have dataset-specific performance. Zihua Hu, Gail R. Willsky |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |