Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sean Graves

dblp:12/2494 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 4 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 42% Robot manipulation · 40% Multi-agent systems · 18%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed control
0.021994
Dynamic Session Management for Telerobotic Control and Simulation · ICRA 1994
A modular software system for distributed telerobotics · ICRA 1992
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation
telerobotics
0.021994
Dynamic Session Management for Telerobotic Control and Simulation · ICRA 1994
A modular software system for distributed telerobotics · ICRA 1992
Robotics › Robot manipulation
compliant motion
0.011996
Derivation of compliant motion programs based on human demonstration · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
force control
0.011996
Derivation of compliant motion programs based on human demonstration · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.011996
Derivation of compliant motion programs based on human demonstration · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robot programming
0.011996
Derivation of compliant motion programs based on human demonstration · ICRA 1996
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
motion control
0.011994
Dynamic Session Management for Telerobotic Control and Simulation · ICRA 1994
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture › communication architecture
wide-area network
0.011992
A modular software system for distributed telerobotics · ICRA 1992

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

object-oriented design · 0.0data-driven control · 0.0termination condition identification · 0.0subtask segmentation · 0.0predictive simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Derivation of compliant motion programs based on human demonstration
abstract
An approach to force controlled robot programming by human demonstration is presented. A human operator utilises a joystick to guide a robot with a force sensor to do a task including continuous contact between a manipulated object and an un-modelled environment. During the demonstration, the position, velocity and force of the object manipulated are acquired. Then the recorded data are processed, analysed, and translated into a textual robot program, which provides more robust execution in the presence of uncertainties. This approach consists of three key techniques-data processing, subtask segmentation and termination condition identification. A software package is developed to generate the programs automatically. Experiments show the industrial applicability.
Joris De Schutter, Wim Witvrouw, Sean Graves
ICRA4
1996 An environment for compliant motion programming by human demonstration
abstract
An integrated system for programming by demonstration, visualizing, and executing compliant motion programs is described. A human operator utilises a joystick to guide a robot with a force sensor to do a task including continuous contact between manipulator and environment. The demonstration may be executed either on an actual robot, or in a graphically simulated environment. During the demonstration, the position, velocity and force of the object manipulated are acquired. Then the recorded data are processed, analysed, and translated into a textual robot program, which provides more robust execution in the presence of uncertainties. The system is composed of a model-based reaction force simulator, a visualization package, a rule-based translator, and an interpreter for compliant motion programs. Experiments show the industrial applicability.
Sean Graves, Wim Witvrouw, Joris De Schutter
IROS1
1995 Action selection in teleautonomous systems
abstract
Numerous generalized architectures for telerobotic systems have been proposed. Most are hard-wired instantiations of a specific approach, which rarely address the interactions between human and autonomous elements of teleautonomous systems. The work described here provides a more general, easily extensible and modifiable architecture. Specific issues addressed include methods that fuse decisions from multiple sources (such as human, reactive, or deliberative), integrate multiple command sources, and accommodate multipurpose event recognizers to change operating modes. These methods may be dynamically altered to generate a variety of control modes. A result of the research described in this paper is a modifiable, extensible framework for the unification of the many modes of control, such as shared, teleoperative, and supervisory, which are described in the telerobotics literature.
Sean Graves, Richard Volz
IROS (3)1
1994 Dynamic Session Management for Telerobotic Control and Simulation
abstract
Session management of a telerobotic operation is an important aspect which has not been adequately addressed by the research community. This paper describes work performed by the Universities Space Automation/Robotics Consortium (USARC) which allows dynamic configuration and monitoring of a telerobotic system which is distributed over a wide-area network. The Telerobotic Session Manager (TSM) allows the session manager to coordinate control among multiple operators, to perform task handoffs or to control multiple robots. This provides greater modularity and reconfigurability than previous telerobot control systems. Motion control of the telerobot is provided by a generic robot motion controller which receives configuration information from TSM. Real or virtual environments are simulated by predictive simulation software which is also configured via TSM. This paper describes TSM, the motion controller, the simulation system, and a variety of tasks which have been performed by the system.>
Sean Graves, John Mollenhauer, Bryan D. Morgan
ICRA1
1992 A modular software system for distributed telerobotics
abstract
Describes a control architecture for telerobotics research. The architecture was object-oriented and data-driven, and can be distributed over many processors on a wide-area network (WAN). The basic capabilities of this testbed have already been demonstrated in tests distributed over four cities. The data distribution techniques of this control architecture are described, as well as details of the current implementation and experimental results.>
Sean Graves, Lawrence A. Ciscon, James D. Wise
ICRA1