Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

S. Baumeler

dblp:12/3969 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Virtual and augmented reality › tracking
3d object tracking		 0.011999
Sensor Spatial Distortion, Visual Latency, and Update Rate Effects on 3D Tracking in Virtual Environments · VR 1999
Virtual and augmented reality
virtual environment		 0.011999
Sensor Spatial Distortion, Visual Latency, and Update Rate Effects on 3D Tracking in Virtual Environments · VR 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cooper-harper controllability scale · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Sensor Spatial Distortion, Visual Latency, and Update Rate Effects on 3D Tracking in Virtual Environments
abstract
We examined the effects of human 3D tracking performance of several common defects of immersing virtual environments: spatial sensor distortion, visual latency and low update rates. Results show: removal of relatively small static distortion had minor effects on tracking accuracy; an adapted Cooper-Harper controllability scale proved the most sensitive subjective indicator of simulation degradation; and RMS tracking error and subjective impressions were more influenced by changing visual latency than by update rate.
Stephen R. Ellis, Bernard D. Adelstein, S. Baumeler, G. J. Jense, Richard H. Jacoby
 VR3