Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael S. Gray

dblp:12/3987 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 46% Face, body and person analysis · 27% Speech recognition and synthesis · 27%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 82% Audio and music processing · 18%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
feature extraction
0.022000
A Comparison of Image Processing Techniques for Visual Speech Recognition Applications · NIPS 2000
Dynamic Features for Visual Speechreading: A Systematic Comparison · NIPS 1996
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › facial expression analysis
facial expression recognition
0.012000
A Comparison of Image Processing Techniques for Visual Speech Recognition Applications · NIPS 2000
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
visual speech recognition
0.012000
A Comparison of Image Processing Techniques for Visual Speech Recognition Applications · NIPS 2000
Image and video processing
image representation
0.012000
A Comparison of Image Processing Techniques for Visual Speech Recognition Applications · NIPS 2000
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.011996
Selective Integration: A Model for Disparity Estimation · NIPS 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision › stereo vision
stereo matching
0.011996
Selective Integration: A Model for Disparity Estimation · NIPS 1996
Computer vision › 3D vision
stereo vision
0.011996
Selective Integration: A Model for Disparity Estimation · NIPS 1996
Audio and music processing › speech recognition
lip-reading
0.011996
Dynamic Features for Visual Speechreading: A Systematic Comparison · NIPS 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stepwise regression · 0.1principal component analysis · 0.1independent component analysis · 0.1systematic comparison · 0.0selective integration · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Practical method for obtaining a feasible integer solution in hierarchical layout optimization
abstract
Layout optimization is a powerful technique for design migration, circuit performance tuning and design for manufacturing. In this paper, we study the problem of layout optimization for the hierarchical circuits in modern VLSI designs which essentially can be formulated as the Integer Linear Programming(ILP) problem. Existing approaches are either unable to handle hierarchy, inefficient or failing to provide the feasible integer solutions for large scale hierarchical layouts. We present a practical method, IRLS algorithm (Iteratively Rounding and LP Solving) which consists of a proper rounding strategy based on the careful analysis of hierarchical layout constraints, to obtain a feasible integer solution in the constraint-based layout modification process, thus enabling efficient optimization for large scale hierarchical layouts, and specifically avoiding the need to use the general ILP solvers. Experimental results demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the IRLS algorithm. Compared with the general ILP/MILP solver, the IRLS algorithm can obtain decent results with much less runtime (speed-up ranging from 4,000X to 360,000X). Compared with the two-step approach[2] on legalizing a set of large scale industry circuit layouts, the IRLS algorithm can provide much better solution (satisfying all abutment/alignment constraints that the two-step approach fails to meet).
Xiaoping Tang, Michael S. Gray
ICCAD3
2000 A Comparison of Image Processing Techniques for Visual Speech Recognition Applications
abstract
We examine eight different techniques for developing visual rep(cid:173) resentations in machine vision tasks. In particular we compare different versions of principal component and independent com(cid:173) ponent analysis in combination with stepwise regression methods for variable selection. We found that local methods, based on the statistics of image patches, consistently outperformed global meth(cid:173) ods based on the statistics of entire images. This result is consistent with previous work on emotion and facial expression recognition. In addition, the use of a stepwise regression technique for selecting variables and regions of interest substantially boosted performance.
Michael S. Gray, Terrence J. Sejnowski, Javier R. Movellan
NIPS1
1996 Dynamic Features for Visual Speechreading: A Systematic Comparison
Michael S. Gray, Javier R. Movellan, Terrence J. Sejnowski
NIPS1
1996 Selective Integration: A Model for Disparity Estimation
Michael S. Gray, Alexandre Pouget, Richard S. Zemel, Steven J. Nowlan, Terrence J. Sejnowski
NIPS1
1995 A perceptron reveals the face of sex
abstract
ermine how the reliability of sex discrimination is related to resolution. A normalized pixel-based representation was used for the faces because it explicitly retained texture and shape information while also maintaining geometric relationships. We found that the linear perceptron model can classify sex from facial images with 81% accuracy, compared to 92% accuracy with compression coding on the same data set [6]. The advantage of using a simple linear perceptron with normalized pixel-based inputs is that it allows us to see explicitly those regions of the face that make the largest and most reliable contributions to the classification of sex. A database of 90 faces (44 males, 46 females) was used (O'Toole, Millward, & Anderson [9]). No facial hair, jewelry, or makeup was on any of the faces. Each face was rotated until the eyes were level, and then scaled and cropped so that each image showed a similar facial area. From the original set of faces, we created 5 separate databases at 5
Michael S. Gray, David T. Lawrence, Beatrice A. Golomb, Terrence J. Sejnowski
Neural Comput.1