Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jagdish Bansiya

dblp:12/5194 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 44% Empirical software engineering · 44% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software design quality
design quality assessment
0.012002
A Hierarchical Model for Object-Oriented Design Quality Assessment · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2002
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
object-oriented design metrics
0.012002
A Hierarchical Model for Object-Oriented Design Quality Assessment · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2002
Software maintenance and evolution › software reuse
software reusability
0.012002
A Hierarchical Model for Object-Oriented Design Quality Assessment · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical quality model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 A Hierarchical Model for Object-Oriented Design Quality Assessment
abstract
The paper describes an improved hierarchical model for the assessment of high-level design quality attributes in object-oriented designs. In this model, structural and behavioral design properties of classes, objects, and their relationships are evaluated using a suite of object-oriented design metrics. This model relates design properties such as encapsulation, modularity, coupling, and cohesion to high-level quality attributes such as reusability, flexibility, and complexity using empirical and anecdotal information. The relationship or links from design properties to quality attributes are weighted in accordance with their influence and importance. The model is validated by using empirical and expert opinion to compare with the model results on several large commercial object-oriented systems. A key attribute of the model is that it can be easily modified to include different relationships and weights, thus providing a practical quality assessment tool adaptable to a variety of demands.
Jagdish Bansiya, Carl G. Davis
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1