Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Panagiotis Konstantopoulos

dblp:12/6867 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network optimization and economics · 50% Routing and switching · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › routing algorithms
optimal routing
0.011985
Optimal Congestion Control in Single Destination Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1985
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation
0.011985
Optimal Congestion Control in Single Destination Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

geometric interpretation · 0.0flow control · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1985 Optimal Congestion Control in Single Destination Networks
abstract
We present an algorithm for optimal routing in communication networks, resulting in minimum time and minimum total delay clearing of congested traffic towards a single destination. The algorithm is suitable for on-line implementation and can also be applied in the presence of time constant external arrival rates. In the case where several optimal solutions exist, the solution given is of the simplest form. The results are discussed and compared to existing ones, in particular to optimal feedback solutions found in the literature. The simplicity of approach and results allows us to give necessary and sufficient conditions for arrival rates, so that the minimal value for the maximal delay encountered by any packet in the network does not increase when these external arrivals are present. This suggests a flow control policy which, together with optimal routing, gives a guaranteed upper limit for traffic delay, while inhibiting incoming traffic as little as necessary. A thorough geometric interpretation is given and examples illustrate the applicability of results.
George I. Stassinopoulos, Panagiotis Konstantopoulos
IEEE Trans. Commun.2