Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shahram Bahrami
dblp:12/6869
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-8179-2788ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
functional enrichment analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Phenotype-specific differences in polygenicity and effect size distribution across functional annotation categories revealed by AI-MiXeR · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Phenotype-specific differences in polygenicity and effect size distribution across functional annotation categories revealed by AI-MiXeR · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
complex trait genetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Phenotype-specific differences in polygenicity and effect size distribution across functional annotation categories revealed by AI-MiXeR · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
summary statistics · 0.4likelihood-based estimation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Phenotype-specific differences in polygenicity and effect size distribution across functional annotation categories revealed by AI-MiXeRabstractMOTIVATION: Determining the relative contributions of functional genetic categories is fundamental to understanding the genetic etiology of complex human traits and diseases. Here, we present Annotation Informed-MiXeR, a likelihood-based method for estimating the number of variants influencing a phenotype and their effect sizes across different functional annotation categories of the genome using summary statistics from genome-wide association studies. RESULTS: Extensive simulations demonstrate that the model is valid for a broad range of genetic architectures. The model suggests that complex human phenotypes substantially differ in the number of causal variants, their localization in the genome and their effect sizes. Specifically, the exons of protein-coding genes harbor more than 90% of variants influencing type 2 diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease, making them good candidates for whole-exome studies. In contrast, <10% of the causal variants for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder are located in protein-coding exons, indicating a more substantial role of regulatory mechanisms in the pathogenesis of these disorders. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is available at: https://github.com/precimed/mixer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Alexey A. Shadrin, Oleksandr Frei, Olav B. Smeland, Francesco Bettella, Kevin S. O'Connell, Osman Gani, Shahram Bahrami, Tea K. E. Uggen, Srdjan Djurovic, Dominic Holland, Ole A. Andreassen, Anders M. Dale |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2016 | Feature-based classification of human transcription factors into hypothetical sub-classes related to regulatory functionabstractBACKGROUND: Transcription factors are key proteins in the regulation of gene transcription. An important step in this process is the opening of chromatin in order to make genomic regions available for transcription. Data on DNase I hypersensitivity has previously been used to label a subset of transcription factors as Pioneers, Settlers and Migrants to describe their potential role in this process. These labels represent an interesting hypothesis on gene regulation and possibly a useful approach for data analysis, and therefore we wanted to expand the set of labeled transcription factors to include as many known factors as possible. We have used a well-annotated dataset of 1175 transcription factors as input to supervised machine learning methods, using the subset with previously assigned labels as training set. We then used the final classifier to label the additional transcription factors according to their potential role as Pioneers, Settlers and Migrants. The full set of labeled transcription factors was used to investigate associated properties and functions of each class, including an analysis of interaction data for transcription factors based on DNA co-binding and protein-protein interactions. We also used the assigned labels to analyze a previously published set of gene lists associated with a time course experiment on cell differentiation. RESULTS: The analysis showed that the classification of transcription factors with respect to their potential role in chromatin opening largely was determined by how they bind to DNA. Each subclass of transcription factors was enriched for properties that seemed to characterize the subclass relative to its role in gene regulation, with very general functions for Pioneers, whereas Migrants to a larger extent were associated with specific processes. Further analysis showed that the expanded classification is a useful resource for analyzing other datasets on transcription factors with respect to their potential role in gene regulation. The analysis of transcription factor interaction data showed complementary differences between the subclasses, where transcription factors labeled as Pioneers often interact with other transcription factors through DNA co-binding, whereas Migrants to a larger extent use protein-protein interactions. The analysis of time course data on cell differentiation indicated a shift in the regulatory program associated with Pioneer-like transcription factors during differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: The expanded classification is an interesting resource for analyzing data on gene regulation, as illustrated here on transcription factor interaction data and data from a time course experiment. The potential regulatory function of transcription factors seems largely to be determined by how they bind DNA, but is also influenced by how they interact with each other through cooperativity and protein-protein interactions. Rezvan Ehsani, Shahram Bahrami, Finn Drabløs |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |