Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan

dblp:12/7825 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
29ranked-venue papers
20as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 20 · 13 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 18 · 12 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Speech recognition and synthesis · 57% Machine translation · 23% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 20%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech analysis
prosody
0.222009
Unsupervised Adaptation of Categorical Prosody Models for Prosody Labeling and Speech Recognition · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2009
Automatic Prosodic Event Detection Using Acoustic, Lexical, and Syntactic Evidence · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2008
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.112010
Discriminative Sample Selection for Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2010
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition
0.112009
Unsupervised Adaptation of Categorical Prosody Models for Prosody Labeling and Speech Recognition · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2009
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised adaptation
0.112009
Unsupervised Adaptation of Categorical Prosody Models for Prosody Labeling and Speech Recognition · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prosodic language model · 0.1lattice enrichment · 0.1classifier · 0.1acoustic-lexical-syntactic features · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Lightly supervised word-sense translation-error detection and resolution in an interactive conversational spoken language translation system
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Dennis Mehay, Sanjika Hewavitharana, Rohit Kumar 0001, Matthew E. Roy, Enoch Kan
Mach. Transl.1
2014 Lightly-Supervised Word Sense Translation Error Detection for an Interactive Conversational Spoken Language Translation System
abstract
Dennis Mehay, Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Sanjika Hewavitharana. Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, volume 2: Short Papers. 2014.
Dennis Mehay, Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Sanjika Hewavitharana
EACL2
2014 Variable Span disfluency detection in ASR transcripts
Rahul Gupta 0001, Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shri Narayanan
INTERSPEECH2
2013 ASR error detection in a conversational spoken language translation system
abstract
Detection of automatic speech recognition (ASR) errors is crucial to preventing their further propagation through statistical machine translation (SMT) in conversational spoken language translation (CSLT) systems. In this paper, we venture beyond traditional features obtained from the ASR decoder and hypothesized word sequence, and explore additional information streams provided by an error-robust CSLT system, including SMT confidence estimates and posteriors from named entity detection (NED). Another significant novelty of this work is the use of an automated word boundary detector based on acoustic-prosodic features to verify the existence of ASR-hypothesized word boundaries, which further improves ASR error detection. Offline evaluation on a test set designed to invoke ASR errors showed that at 10% false alarm rate, the proposed features provide 2.8% absolute (4.2% relative) improvement in detection rate over a state-of-the-art baseline error detector that uses a rich set of features traditionally employed in the existing literature.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Rohit Kumar 0001, Rohit Prasad, Premkumar Natarajan
ICASSP2
2013 Variable-Span out-of-vocabulary named entity detection
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Rohit Prasad, Premkumar Natarajan
INTERSPEECH2
2013 Semi-Supervised Word Sense Disambiguation for Mixed-Initiative Conversational Spoken Language Translation
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Sanjika Hewavitharana, Rohit Kumar 0001, Enoch Kan, Rohit Prasad, Premkumar Natarajan
MTSummit1
2013 Interactive Error Resolution Strategies for Speech-to-Speech Translation Systems
Rohit Kumar 0001, Matthew E. Roy, Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Sanjika Hewavitharana, Fred Choi
SIGDIAL Conference3
2013 Batch-mode semi-supervised active learning for statistical machine translation
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Rohit Prasad, David Stallard, Premkumar Natarajan
Comput. Speech Lang.1
2012 Automatic pronunciation prediction for text-to-speech synthesis of dialectal arabic in a speech-to-speech translation system
abstract
Text-to-speech synthesis (TTS) is the final stage in the speech-tospeech (S2S) translation pipeline, producing an audible rendition of translated text in the target language. TTS systems typically rely on a lexicon to look up pronunciations for each word in the input text. This is problematic when the target language is dialectal Arabic, because the statistical machine translation (SMT) system usually produces undiacritized text output. Many words in the latter possess multiple pronunciations; the correct choice must be inferred from context. In this paper, we present a weakly supervised pronunciation prediction approach for undiacritized dialectal Arabic in S2S systems that leverages automatic speech recognition (ASR) to obtain parallel training data for pronunciation prediction. Additionally, we show that incorporating source language features derived from SMT-generated automatic word alignment further improves automatic pronunciation prediction accuracy.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Stavros Tsakalidis, Rohit Prasad, Premkumar Natarajan, Aravind Namandi Vembu
ICASSP1
2012 Detecting OOV Named-Entities in Conversational Speech
Rohit Kumar 0001, Rohit Prasad, Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Aravind Namandi Vembu, David Stallard, Stavros Tsakalidis, Premkumar Natarajan
INTERSPEECH3
2012 Emotion Recognition using Acoustic and Lexical Features
Viktor Rozgic, Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shirin Saleem, Rohit Kumar 0001, Aravind Namandi Vembu, Rohit Prasad
INTERSPEECH2
2011 Model-based parametric features for emotion recognition from speech
abstract
Automatic emotion recognition from speech is desirable in many applications relying on spoken language processing. Telephone-based customer service systems, psychological healthcare initiatives, and virtual training modules are examples of real-world applications that would significantly benefit from such capability. Traditional utterance-level emotion recognition relies on a global feature set obtained by computing various statistics from raw segmental and supra-segmental measurements, including fundamental frequency (F0), energy, and MFCCs. In this paper, we propose a novel, model-based parametric feature set that better discriminates between the competing emotion classes. Our approach relaxes modeling assumptions associated with using global statistics (e.g. mean, standard deviation, etc.) of traditional segment-level features for classification, and results in significant improvements over the state-of-the-art in 7-way emotion classification accuracy on the standard, freely-available Berlin Emotional Speech Corpus. These improvements are consistent even in a reduced feature space obtained by Fisher's Multiple Linear Discriminant Analysis, demonstrating the signficantly higher discriminative power of the proposed feature set.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Aravind Namandi Vembu, Rohit Prasad
ASRU1
2011 Source Error-Projection for Sample Selection in Phrase-Based SMT for Resource-Poor Languages
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shiv Vitaladevuni, Rohit Prasad, Premkumar Natarajan
IJCNLP1
2011 System Combination Using Discriminative Cross-Adaptation
Jacob Devlin, Antti-Veikko I. Rosti, Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Spyridon Matsoukas
IJCNLP3
2011 On-Line Language Model Biasing for Multi-Pass Automatic Speech Recognition
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Stavros Tsakalidis, Rohit Prasad, Premkumar Natarajan
INTERSPEECH1
2010 A Semi-Supervised Batch-Mode Active Learning Strategy for Improved Statistical Machine Translation
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Rohit Prasad, David Stallard, Premkumar Natarajan
CoNLL1
2010 Discriminative Sample Selection for Statistical Machine Translation
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Rohit Prasad, David Stallard, Premkumar Natarajan
EMNLP1
2010 Phrase alignment confidence for statistical machine translation
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Rohit Prasad, Premkumar Natarajan
INTERSPEECH1
2010 An unsupervised boosting technique for refiningword alignment
abstract
Translation rules extracted from automatic word alignment form the basis of statistical machine translation (SMT) systems. An unsupervised expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is typically used to obtain a word alignment from parallel corpora. Being statistically-driven, the alignments produced by this technique are often erroneous. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised boosting strategy for refining automatic word alignment with the goal of improving SMT performance. The proposed approach results in fewer unaligned words, a significant reduction in the number of extracted translation phrase pairs, a corresponding improvement in SMT decoding speed, and a consistent improvement in translation accuracy, as measured by BLEU, across multiple language pairs and test sets. The reduction in storage and processing requirements coupled with improved accuracy make the proposed technique ideally suited for interactive translation services, facilitating applications such as mobile speech-to-speech translation.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Rohit Prasad, Premkumar Natarajan
SLT1
2009 Unsupervised Adaptation of Categorical Prosody Models for Prosody Labeling and Speech Recognition
abstract
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems rely almost exclusively on short-term segment-level features (MFCCs), while ignoring higher level suprasegmental cues that are characteristic of human speech. However, recent experiments have shown that categorical representations of prosody, such as those based on the Tones and Break Indices (ToBI) annotation standard, can be used to enhance speech recognizers. However, categorical prosody models are severely limited in scope and coverage due to the lack of large corpora annotated with the relevant prosodic symbols (such as pitch accent, word prominence, and boundary tone labels). In this paper, we first present an architecture for augmenting a standard ASR with symbolic prosody. We then discuss two novel, un-supervised adaptation techniques for improving, respectively, the quality of the linguistic and acoustic components of our categorical prosody models. Finally, we implement the augmented ASR by enriching ASR lattices with the adapted categorical prosody models. Our experiments show that the proposed unsupervised adaptation techniques significantly improve the quality of the prosody models; the adapted prosodic language and acoustic models reduce binary pitch accent (presence versus absence) classification error rate by 13.8% and 4.3%, respectively (relative to the seed models) on the Boston University Radio News Corpus, while the prosody-enriched ASR exhibits a 3.1% relative reduction in word error rate (WER) over the baseline system.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shri Narayanan
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1
2008 Automatic classification of question turns in spontaneous speech using lexical and prosodic evidence
abstract
The ability to identify speech acts reliably is desirable in any spoken language system that interacts with humans. Minimally, such a system should be capable of distinguishing between question-bearing turns and other types of utterances. However, this is a non-trivial task, since spontaneous speech tends to have incomplete syntactic, and even ungrammatical, structure and is characterized by disfluencies, repairs and other non-linguistic vocalizations that make simple rule based pattern learning difficult. In this paper, we present a system for identifying question-bearing turns in spontaneous multi-party speech (ICSI Meeting Corpus) using lexical and prosodic evidence. On a balanced test set, our system achieves an accuracy of 71.9% for the binary question vs. non-question classification task. Further, we investigate the robustness of our proposed technique to uncertainty in the lexical feature stream (e.g. caused by speech recognition errors). Our experiments indicate that classification accuracy of the proposed method is robust to errors in the text stream, dropping only about 0.8% for every 10% increase in word error rate (WER).
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Prasanta Kumar Ghosh, Shri Narayanan
ICASSP1
2008 A novel algorithm for unsupervised prosodic language model adaptation
abstract
Symbolic representations of prosodic events have been shown to be useful for spoken language applications such as speech recognition. However, a major drawback with categorical prosody models is their lack of scalability due to the difficulty in annotating large corpora with prosodic tags for training. In this paper, we present a novel, unsupervised adaptation technique for bootstrapping categorical prosodic language models (PLMs) from a small, annotated training set. Our experiments indicate that the adaptation algorithm significantly improves the quality and coverage of the PLM. On a test set derived from the Boston University Radio News corpus, the adapted PLM gave a relative improvement of 13.8% over the seed PLM on the binary pitch accent detection task, while reducing the OOV rate by 16.5% absolute.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shri Narayanan
ICASSP1
2008 Fine-grained pitch accent and boundary tone labeling with parametric F0 features
abstract
Motivated by linguistic theories of prosodic categoricity, symbolic representations of prosody have recently attracted the attention of speech technologists. Categorical representations such as ToBI not only bear linguistic relevance, but also have the advantage that they can be easily modeled and integrated within applications. Since manual labeling of these categories is time-consuming and expensive, there has been significant interest in automatic prosody labeling. This paper presents a fine-grained ToBI-style prosody labeling system that makes use of features derived from RFC and TILT parameterization of F0 together with a n-gram prosodic language model for 4-way pitch accent labeling and 2-way boundary tone labeling. For this task, our system achieves pitch accent labeling accuracy of 56.4% and boundary tone labeling accuracy of 67.7% on the Boston University Radio News Corpus.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shri Narayanan
ICASSP1
2008 Automatic Prosodic Event Detection Using Acoustic, Lexical, and Syntactic Evidence
abstract
With the advent of prosody annotation standards such as tones and break indices (ToBI), speech technologists and linguists alike have been interested in automatically detecting prosodic events in speech. This is because the prosodic tier provides an additional layer of information over the short-term segment-level features and lexical representation of an utterance. As the prosody of an utterance is closely tied to its syntactic and semantic content in addition to its lexical content, knowledge of the prosodic events within and across utterances can assist spoken language applications such as automatic speech recognition and translation. On the other hand, corpora annotated with prosodic events are useful for building natural-sounding speech synthesizers. In this paper, we build an automatic detector and classifier for prosodic events in American English, based on their acoustic, lexical, and syntactic correlates. Following previous work in this area, we focus on accent (prominence, or "stress") and prosodic phrase boundary detection at the syllable level. Our experiments achieved a performance rate of 86.75% agreement on the accent detection task, and 91.61% agreement on the phrase boundary detection task on the Boston University Radio News Corpus.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shri Narayanan
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.1
2007 Improved Speech Recognition using Acoustic and Lexical Correlates of Pitch Accent in a N-Best Rescoring Framework
abstract
Most statistical speech recognition systems make use of segment-level features, derived mainly from spectral envelope characteristics of the signal, but ignore supra-segmental cues that carry additional information likely to be useful for speech recognition. These cues, which constitute the prosody of the utterance and occur at the syllable, word and utterance level, are closely related to the lexical and syntactic organization of the utterance. In this paper, we explore the use of acoustic and lexical correlates of a subset of these cues in order to improve recognition performance on a read-speech corpus, using word error rate (WER) as the metric. Using the features and methods described in this paper, we were able to obtain a relative WER improvement of 1.3% over a baseline ASR system on the Boston University Radio News Corpus.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shri Narayanan
ICASSP (4)1
2007 Prosody-enriched lattices for improved syllable recognition
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shri Narayanan
INTERSPEECH1
2006 Speech Recognition Engineering Issues in Speech to Speech Translation System Design for Low Resource Languages and Domains
abstract
Engineering automatic speech recognition (ASR) for speech to speech (S2S) translation systems, especially targeting languages and domains that do not have readily available spoken language resources, is immensely challenging due to a number of reasons. In addition to contending with the conventional data-hungry speech acoustic and language modeling needs, these designs have to accommodate varying requirements imposed by the domain needs and characteristics, target device and usage modality (such as phrase-based, or spontaneous free form interactions, with or without visual feedback) and huge spoken language variability arising due to socio-linguistic and cultural differences of the users. This paper, using case studies of creating speech translation systems between English and languages such as Pashto and Farsi, describes some of the practical issues and the solutions that were developed for multilingual ASR development. These include novel acoustic and language modeling strategies such as language adaptive recognition, active-learning based language modeling, class-based language models that can better exploit resource poor language data, efficient search strategies, including N-best and confidence generation to aid multiple hypotheses translation, use of dialog information and clever interface choices to facilitate ASR, and audio interface design for meeting both usability and robustness requirements
Shri Narayanan, Panayiotis G. Georgiou, Abhinav Sethy, Dagen Wang, Murtaza Bulut, Shiva Sundaram, Emil Ettelaie, Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Horacio Franco, Kristin Precoda, Dimitra Vergyri, Jing Zheng 0001, Wen Wang 0001, Venkata Ramana Rao Gadde, Martin Graciarena, Victor Abrash, Michael W. Frandsen, Colleen Richey
ICASSP (5)8
2006 Combining acoustic, lexical, and syntactic evidence for automatic unsupervised prosody labeling
abstract
Automatic labeling of prosodic events in speech has potentially significant implications for spoken language processing applications, and has received much attention over the years, especially after the introduction of annotation standards such as ToBI. Current labeling techniques are based on supervised learning, relying on the availability of a corpus that is annotated with the prosodic labels of interest in order to train the system. However, creating such resources is an expensive and time-consuming task. In this paper, we examine an unsupervised labeling algorithm for accent (prominence) and prosodic phrase boundary detection at the linguistic syllable level, and evaluate their performance on an standard, manually annotated corpus. We obtain labeling accuracies of 77.8 % and 88.5 % for the accent and boundary labeling tasks, respectively. These figures compare well against previously reported performance levels for supervised labelers. Index Terms: prosody recognition, accent, stress, prominence, prosodic boundary, spoken language processing.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shri Narayanan
INTERSPEECH1
2005 An Automatic Prosody Recognizer using a Coupled Multi-Stream Acoustic Model and a Syntactic-Prosodic Language Model
abstract
Automatic detection and labeling of prosodic events in speech has received much attention from speech technologists and linguists ever since the introduction of annotation standards such as ToBI. Since prosody is intricately bound to the semantics of the utterance, recognition of prosodic events is important for spoken language applications such as automatic understanding and translation of speech. Moreover, corpora labeled with prosodic markers are essential for building speech synthesizers that use data-driven approaches to generate natural speech. In this paper, we build a prosody recognition system that detects stress and prosodic boundaries at the word and syllable level in American English using a coupled hidden Markov model (CHMM) to model multiple, asynchronous acoustic feature streams and a syntactic-prosodic model that captures the relationship between the syntax of the utterance and its prosodic structure. Experiments show that the recognizer achieves about 75% agreement on stress labeling and 88% agreement on boundary labeling at the syllable level.
Sankaranarayanan Ananthakrishnan, Shri Narayanan
ICASSP (1)1