Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

T. Sivabalan

dblp:12/9104 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Energy-efficient computing · 70% Performance modeling and evaluation · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Energy-efficient computing
datacenter power management
0.112010
Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers · HPCA 2010
Energy-efficient computing › datacenter power management
server-level power monitoring
0.112010
Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers · HPCA 2010
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.112010
Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers · HPCA 2010
Energy-efficient computing
power management
0.012010
Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers · HPCA 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical measurement · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Worth their watts? - an empirical study of datacenter servers
abstract
The management of power consumption in datacenters has become an important problem. This needs a systematic evaluation of the as-is scenario to identify potential areas for improvement and quantify the impact of any strategy. We present a measurement study of a production datacenter from a joint perspective of power and performance at the individual server level. Our observations help correlate power consumption of production servers with their activity, and identify easily implementable improvements. We find that production servers are underutilized from an activity perspective; are overrated from a power perspective; execute temporally similar workloads over a granularity of weeks; do not idle efficiently; and have power consumptions that are well tracked by their CPU utilizations. Our measurements suggest the following steps for improvement: staggering periodic activities on servers; enabling deeper sleep states; and provisioning based on measurement.
Arunchandar Vasan 0001, Anand Sivasubramaniam, Vikrant Shimpi, T. Sivabalan, Rajesh Subbiah
HPCA4