Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yulin Jiang
dblp:120/1085
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4135-0261ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Spiking Self-Attention Mechanism: Implementing a-XNOR Similarity Calculation in Spiking Transformers · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › self-attention
spiking self-attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Spiking Self-Attention Mechanism: Implementing a-XNOR Similarity Calculation in Spiking Transformers · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Spiking Self-Attention Mechanism: Implementing a-XNOR Similarity Calculation in Spiking Transformers · CVPR 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Spiking Self-Attention Mechanism: Implementing a-XNOR Similarity Calculation in Spiking Transformers · CVPR 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing
spiking neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Spiking Self-Attention Mechanism: Implementing a-XNOR Similarity Calculation in Spiking Transformers · CVPR 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing › spiking neural network
spiking transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Spiking Self-Attention Mechanism: Implementing a-XNOR Similarity Calculation in Spiking Transformers · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
α-XNOR similarity · 1.7spike train similarity · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Rethinking Spiking Self-Attention Mechanism: Implementing a-XNOR Similarity Calculation in Spiking TransformersabstractTransformers significantly raise the performance limits across various tasks, spurring research into integrating them into spiking neural networks. However, a notable performance gap remains between existing spiking Transformers and their artificial neural network counterparts. Here, we first analyze the cause of this gap and attribute it to the dot product’s ineffectiveness in measuring similarity between spiking queries and keys, due to numerous non-spiking events. To address this, we propose a novel α-XNOR similarity measure tailored for spike trains. It redefines the correlation between non-spike pairs as a specific value α, effectively overcoming the limitations of dot-product similarity. Furthermore, considering the sparse nature of spike trains where spikes carry more information than non-spikes, the α-XNOR similarity correspondingly highlights the distinct importance of spikes over non-spikes. Extensive experiments demonstrate that α-XNOR similarity significantly improves performance across different spiking Transformer architectures on various static and neuromorphic datasets, further revealing the potential of spiking Transformers. Yichen Xiao, Shuai Wang 0058, Dehao Zhang, Wenjie Wei, Yimeng Shan, Yulin Jiang, Malu Zhang |
CVPR | 7 |
| 2021 | Compressive Sampling for Array CamerasabstractWhile design of high-performance lenses and image sensors has long been the focus of camera development, the size, weight, and power of image data processing components are currently the primary barriers to radical improvements in camera resolution. Here we show that deep learning--aided compressive sampling can reduce operating power on camera head electronics by 20 times or more. Traditional compressive sampling has to date been primarily applied in the physical sensor layer. We show here that with the aid of deep learning algorithms, compressive sampling is offers unique power management advantages in digital layer compression. Xuefei Yan, David J. Brady, Changzhi Yu, Yulin Jiang, Jianqiang Wang 0006, Zian Li, Zhan Ma 0001 |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 5 |