Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew J. Roback
dblp:120/5823
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing › social media
political communication |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Tweet acts: how constituents lobby congress via Twitter · CSCW 2014 |
Collaborative and social computing
social media |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Tweet acts: how constituents lobby congress via Twitter · CSCW 2014 |
Collaborative and social computing › social media
twitter |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Tweet acts: how constituents lobby congress via Twitter · CSCW 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
content analysis · 0.2categorization scheme · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Tweet acts: how constituents lobby congress via TwitterabstractTwitter is increasingly becoming a medium through which constituents can lobby their elected representatives in Congress about issues that matter to them. Past research has focused on how citizens communicate with each other or how members of Congress (MOCs) use social media in general; our research examines how citizens communicate with MOCs. We contribute to existing literature through the careful examination of hundreds of citizen-authored tweets and the development of a categorization scheme to describe common strategies of lobbying on Twitter. Our findings show that contrary to past research that assumed citizens used Twitter to merely shout out their opinions on issues, citizens utilize a variety of sophisticated techniques to impact political outcomes. Libby Hemphill, Andrew J. Roback |
CSCW | 2 |
| 2012 | A framework and future direction for studying productive applications of social media / social networking sitesabstractI am researching how non-governmental organizations (NGOs) utilize social media and social networking sites (SM/SNS) in their efforts to organize, inform, and serve the communities they operate in as well as how they use these technologies to communicate and disseminate information. This study will gather data on persons posting on behalf of NGOs and examine SM/SNS data with the goal of developing a framework for both future research and contextual application of SM/SNS as a mediating artifact by NGOs. Many previous studies have addressed similar issues, but those studies are limited in context (e.g. one large software manufacturer) and they typically use only one type of research method. I will address this issue by aggregating a large data set and employing mixed methods to improve the generalizability of my findings and present a replicable framework for future studies of organizational use of SM/SNS. Andrew J. Roback |
GROUP | 1 |