Keeping a driver focused on the road is one of the most critical steps in insuring the safe operation of a vehicle. The Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP2) has over 3,100 recorded videos of volunteer drivers during a period of 2 years. This extensive naturalistic driving study (NDS) contains over one million hours of video and associated data that could aid safety researchers in understanding where the driver's attention is focused. Manual analysis of this data is infeasible; therefore efforts are underway to develop automated feature extraction algorithms to process and characterize the data. The real-world nature, volume, and acquisition conditions are unmatched in the transportation community, but there are also challenges because the data has relatively low resolution, high compression rates, and differing illumination conditions. A smaller dataset, the head pose validation study, is available which used the same recording equipment as SHRP2 but is more easily accessible with less privacy constraints. In this work we report initial head pose accuracy using commercial and open source face pose estimation algorithms on the head pose validation data set.

Facial recognition algorithms should be able to operate even when similar-looking individuals are encountered, or even in the extreme case of identical twins. An experimental data set comprised of 17486 images from 126 pairs of identical twins (252 subjects) collected on the same day and 6864 images from 120 pairs of identical twins (240 subjects) with images taken a year later was used to measure the performance on seven different face recognition algorithms. Performance is reported for variations in illumination, expression, gender, and age for both the same day and cross-year image sets. Regardless of the conditions of image acquisition, distinguishing identical twins are significantly harder than distinguishing subjects who are not identical twins for all algorithms.

The performance of face recognition algorithms is affected both by external factors and internal subject characteristics [I]. Reliably identifying these factors and understanding their behavior on performance can potentially serve two important goals to predict the performance of the algorithms at novel deployment sites and to design appropriate acquisition environments at prospective sites to optimize performance. There have been a few recent efforts in this direction that focus on identifying factors that affect face recognition performance but there has been no extensive study regarding the consistency of the effects various factors have on algorithms when other covariates vary. To give an example, a smiling target image has been reported to be better than a neutral expression image, but is this true across all possible illumination conditions, head poses, gender, etc.? In this paper, we perform rigorous experiments to provide answers to such questions. Our investigation indicates that controlled lighting and smiling expression are the most favorable conditions that consistently give superior performance even when other factors are allowed to vary. We also observe that internal subject characterization using biometric menagerie-based classification shows very weak consistency when external conditions are allowed to vary.

Biometric identification systems must be able to distinguish between individuals even in situations where the bio metric signature may be similar, such as in the case of identical twins. This paper presents experiments done in facial recognition using data from a set of images of twins. This work establishes the current state of facial recognition in regards to twins and the accuracy of current state-of-the art programs in distinguishing between identical twins using three commercial face matchers, Cognitec 8.3.2.0, VeriLook 4.0, and PittPatt 4.2.1 and a baseline matcher employing Local Region PCA. Overall, it was observed that Cognitec had the best performance. All matchers, how ever, saw degradation in performance compared to an experiment where the ability to distinguish unrelated persons was assessed. In particular, lighting and expression seemed to have affected performance the most.