Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kelsey P. Hawkins

dblp:121/4152 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-5289-9164ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › human-robot collaboration
collaborative assembly
0.212014
Anticipating human actions for collaboration in the presence of task and sensor uncertainty · ICRA 2014
Human-robot interaction › human behavior modeling
human action prediction
0.212014
Anticipating human actions for collaboration in the presence of task and sensor uncertainty · ICRA 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic graphical model · 0.4planning · 0.4inference · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Anticipating human actions for collaboration in the presence of task and sensor uncertainty
abstract
A representation for structured activities is developed that allows a robot to probabilistically infer which task actions a human is currently performing and to predict which future actions will be executed and when they will occur. The goal is to enable a robot to anticipate collaborative actions in the presence of uncertain sensing and task ambiguity. The system can represent multi-path tasks where the task variations may contain partially ordered actions or even optional actions that may be skipped altogether. The task is represented by an AND-OR tree structure from which a probabilistic graphical model is constructed. Inference methods for that model are derived that support a planning and execution system for the robot which attempts to minimize a cost function based upon expected human idle time. We demonstrate the theory in both simulation and actual human-robot performance of a two-way-branch assembly task. In particular we show that the inference model can robustly anticipate the actions of the human even in the presence of unreliable or noisy detections because of its integration of all its sensing information along with knowledge of task structure.
Kelsey P. Hawkins, Shray Bansal, Nam N. Vo, Aaron F. Bobick
ICRA1
2012 Robots for humanity: User-centered design for assistive mobile manipulation
abstract
The Robots for Humanity project aims to enable people with severe motor impairments to interact with their own bodies and their environment through the use of an assistive mobile manipulator, thereby improving their quality of life. Assistive mobile manipulators (AMMs) are mobile robots that physically manipulate the world in order to provide assistance to people with disabilities. They present an exciting frontier for assistive technology, as they can operate away from the user, have a large dexterous workspace (due to their mobility), and not directly encumber their users. The cornerstone of this project is an ongoing, interactive design process with a quadriplegic user, Henry Evans, and his wife and primary caregiver, Jane Evans. Henry has been enabled, through the use of a PR2 robot, to scratch his own face, shave, fetch a towel from his kitchen, and hand out Halloween candy to trick-ortreating children at a local mall.
Tiffany L. Chen, Matei T. Ciocarlie, Steve B. Cousins, Phillip M. Grice, Kelsey P. Hawkins, Kaijen Hsiao, Charles C. Kemp, Chih-Hung King, Daniel A. Lazewatsky, Adam Leeper, Hai Nguyen 0003, Andreas Paepcke, Caroline Pantofaru, William D. Smart, Leila Takayama
IROS5
2012 Informing assistive robots with models of contact forces from able-bodied face wiping and shaving
abstract
Hygiene and feeding are activities of daily living (ADLs) that often involve contact with a person's face. Robots can assist people with motor impairments to perform these tasks by holding a tool that makes contact with the care receiver's face. By sensing the forces applied to the face with the tool, robots could potentially provide assistance that is more comfortable, safe, and effective. In order to inform the design of robotic controllers and assistive robots, we investigated the forces able-bodied people apply to themselves when wiping and shaving their faces. We present our methods for capturing and modeling these forces, results from a study with 9 participants, and recommendations for assistive robots. Our contributions include a trapezoidal force model that assumes participants have a target force they attempt to achieve for each stroke of the tool. We discuss advantages of this 3 parameter model and show that it fits our data well relative to other candidate models. We also provide statistics of the models' rise rates, fall rates, and target forces for the 9 participants in our study. In addition, we illustrate how the target forces varied based on the task, participant, and location on the face.
Kelsey P. Hawkins, Chih-Hung King, Tiffany L. Chen, Charles C. Kemp
RO-MAN1